Una pareja acoge a sus sobrinos y empieza a notar actividad inusual en su hogar. Con la ayuda de cámaras de vigilancia, descubren que son acechados por un demonio.Una pareja acoge a sus sobrinos y empieza a notar actividad inusual en su hogar. Con la ayuda de cámaras de vigilancia, descubren que son acechados por un demonio.Una pareja acoge a sus sobrinos y empieza a notar actividad inusual en su hogar. Con la ayuda de cámaras de vigilancia, descubren que son acechados por un demonio.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 5 nominaciones en total
Opiniones destacadas
I will start off by saying I LOVE the Scary Movie franchise, especially scary movie 3. My girlfriend and I went to see it on the 12th, we were so excited because we both love the previous films. 5 to 10 minutes into it, neither of us were laughing, just straight face. I whispered over to her and told her this is really stupid, she agreed. None of other people that were sitting in the room laugh either. I can't believe we actually sat through the whole movie until the end, since we paid for it already. It had like 3 moments that made us chuckle a bit, but that was it. If I could demand my money back, I would. Little note for the producers- Instead of paying huge amounts of money to the celebrities, how about spend some in developing the story and jokes? I would say this movie *might* make little 10 years old children laugh, but that's about it.
It was so bad that I decided to make an IMDb account to criticize.
It was so bad that I decided to make an IMDb account to criticize.
Don't bother going to see this junk. It appears to be very low budget and infantile. I have enjoyed the other Scary movies but this one has no redeeming value. My 15 year old son said it was the worst movie he has ever seen. Disjointed. People were leaving the theater before the halfway point and it is only an hour and a half. There is really not much you can say about it except to wait until it comes out on Netflix and even then it will hard to watch. Honestly I can't believe that after the movie company watched this movie they had the nerve to release it. In my opinion this would hurt your reputation as a Film maker more than helping by a long shot. There is a considerable difference in the quality of this Scary movie and the others, none of the original cast appear in the movie and it seems to be based mostly on paranormal activity, the set becomes very stagnant. My son said that the actual paranormal activity was funnier. My son loves the Scary movie brand, he said this one would give the franchise a bad name and he would give it a -2 if he could.
This is a good reason to use Pirate Bay. The public is certainly being ripped off by paying for this kind of crap.
Anyone who gives this movie a positive review should be suspect. They are either being paid or benefiting in some way.
I like this type of movie - this one is just bad.
This is a good reason to use Pirate Bay. The public is certainly being ripped off by paying for this kind of crap.
Anyone who gives this movie a positive review should be suspect. They are either being paid or benefiting in some way.
I like this type of movie - this one is just bad.
They through a lot of parodies at you in this fifth installment, and there where only 3 or 4 times that I laughed, but for the most part I'm just staring at the screen and wondering how is this funny. It seems that the filmmakers are trying to too hard to be funny, and the more they are trying they fail completely failed. But I can see the parts where they where not trying so hard, are probably the parts that i was laughing.
Ashley Tisdale who I don't doubt is a very talented actress, but is incredibly bland here, nothing she does just does not jump out at you. Charlie Sheen and Lindsay Lohan are pretty good spoofing themselves, but lets face they are already become parodies of themselves at this point. Simon Rex is alright, but really he is just there also. Not as bad has Movie 43, but still not as funny has it tried to be, but still good for a few chuckles.
Ashley Tisdale who I don't doubt is a very talented actress, but is incredibly bland here, nothing she does just does not jump out at you. Charlie Sheen and Lindsay Lohan are pretty good spoofing themselves, but lets face they are already become parodies of themselves at this point. Simon Rex is alright, but really he is just there also. Not as bad has Movie 43, but still not as funny has it tried to be, but still good for a few chuckles.
It's fair to say that it is the worst of the series, it's let down by some really awful scenes, and some dire performances, but, it still has some of the old magic, and a few times I did find myself laughing. The scene between Sheen and Lohan was perhaps the worst thing I have ever seen, it was appalling, almost like an attempt to replicate the Pamela Anderson scene, but it was just terrible. The Black Swan scenes were lots of fun, and nicely produced, they felt at odds with lots of the film.
Is it the case that people's humour has changed since the early films, or were the jokes simply not funny? Personally I think it's the latter, in fairness though it isn't as if there were great horror movies to parody.
It's poor, but will still give the odd chuckle. 5/10
Is it the case that people's humour has changed since the early films, or were the jokes simply not funny? Personally I think it's the latter, in fairness though it isn't as if there were great horror movies to parody.
It's poor, but will still give the odd chuckle. 5/10
I love parody movies, and have seen and have in my possession quite a few, especially those that feature the late and fantastic Leslie Neilson, including the previous Scary Movies. The previous 4 are great, they're funny and you can actually have a good time watching them. Laughs aplenty. This one... not so much. It had it's moments, but other than that it was just a ho-hum type movie. Didn't have the engaging action and comedy that you're used to from the previous films, and just didn't really do anything for me. I like Charlie Sheen as an actor, and he's can play some funny parts, and this was no exception, but then it kind of dwindled after that. I think it's because the previous cast were not there. I think that if all the previous actors were included, it would have been a great movie.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis was the least financially successful entry in the "Scary Movie" series.
- Errores(at around 1h 20 mins) Stuntwoman Stacey Howell-Brown is listed twice in the on-screen credits, under two different names ('Stacey Howell Brown' and 'Stacy L. Howell Brown').
- Citas
Christian Grey: Your safe word is... Deeper.
- Créditos curiososThere is a final scene after the end credits.
- Versiones alternativasThe Unrated version runs approximately 2min longer.
- ConexionesEdited from Stuart Little, un ratón en la familia (1999)
- Bandas sonorasRight There
Written by Marcus Bell (as Marcus Lee Bell)
Performed by BellRinger
Courtesy of InDigi Music and Bellringer Productions, LLC
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Scary Movie 5: el mal ya viene
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 20,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 32,015,787
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 14,157,367
- 14 abr 2013
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 78,378,744
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 28min(88 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta