Agrega una trama en tu idiomaCharlie Baxter, a struggling screenwriter, is searching for accommodation in a rundown mansion somewhere in the isolated mountains above Malibu. An expressionless and creatively bankrupt you... Leer todoCharlie Baxter, a struggling screenwriter, is searching for accommodation in a rundown mansion somewhere in the isolated mountains above Malibu. An expressionless and creatively bankrupt young man who rewrites exploitation sci-fi / horror scripts for a living, he takes a room in ... Leer todoCharlie Baxter, a struggling screenwriter, is searching for accommodation in a rundown mansion somewhere in the isolated mountains above Malibu. An expressionless and creatively bankrupt young man who rewrites exploitation sci-fi / horror scripts for a living, he takes a room in the mansion and learns of the mysterious doctor residing in the room above his own who dab... Leer todo
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The acting and the FX are not at fault in this. The story and script simply have nothing of interest to share. Worse, obvious parts that needed updating to adjust for the age of the story it's based upon didn't get updated. Setting the leftovers of the 1980s in decay and the thin, white Apple notebook computer is a clear indication they wanted to provide a modern interpretation.
Instead, it feels like a late 1940s/early 50s Hollywood script using tricks to hide the lack of substance. At best, an addition to an existing TV soap opera where the expectations and quality are already low.
Sadly I keep forgetting that folks have the nasty habit of butchering his material and that I've seen a laundry list of adaptations that have been less than flattering.
Cool Air is possibly the worst of the bunch, it tells the story of a man who moves into a building with mysterious lodger that peaks his interest. The plot beyond that is disjointed, barely followable and incoherent at it's best.
Lovecraft has done so much fantastic work, why does it keep falling into the hands of the least competent individuals?
Awful stuff, do not be tempted by it being a Lovecraft adaptation you WILL be disappointed.
The Good:
It's Lovecraft
The Bad:
Plot is an absolute mess
Audio quality is terrrible
Simply looks cheap
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
The writers don't know what an oxymoron is
If you know Lovecraft you know how difficult it is to transform his writing into film. The 2006 adaptation does this well by translating 1923's New York to an isolated place close to L.A. in the 2000s, Dr. Munoz to a woman and adding more characters. I expected poor acting from the mainly unknown cast, but I was pleasantly surprised to see that they all did a very good job.
Unfortunately, this could not really fill the entire length of a full movie so that film feels unbearably drawn out. This could have been a really enjoyable 40 minute short, but instead it lasts for one hour and seventeen minutes of narrating slowly and the same melody playing incessantly in the background.
Bottom line: a decent adaptation of a Lovecraftian short story that is not related to the Chtulhu mythos. The element of romantic tension and the various characters that were added were refreshing and enhanced the story. Everybody played well and it felt like a filmed play. Unfortunately the movie suffers from terrible pacing and it would have benefited from a shorter cut.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAt the bottom of the stairwell in the boarding house is a poster for the 9th annual "Call to the Wall" at Malibu Surfrider Beach.
- ConexionesVersion of Galería nocturna: Cool Air/Camera Obscura/Quoth the Raven (1971)
Selecciones populares
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 1,550,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 18 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1