Beaufort

Right-wing audiences have criticized "Beaufort" for being left-winged, while left-wing audiences have criticized the movie for being right-winged. Immediately that should tell you this is a movie worth watching.

Like all great war films, "Beaufort" avoids situational politics and instead focuses on the broader, universal issue of war which all sides can agree upon: war is hell. Or specifically in this case, war is pointless hell. Here we have an excellent illustration; "Beaufort" is the story of a handful of soldiers who fight admirably to defend a fort, simply so that they can abandon it as planned a few days later. Folks, it don't get any more pointless than that. I would tip my hat to the genius who came up with such a great metaphor, but the funny thing is that the story came straight out of history.

(Note: although this film depicts the Israeli withdrawal from Castle Beaufort which was returned to Lebanon in 2000, it was actually filmed at a different fortress at the Golan Heights in Syrian territory currently held by Israel.)

Joseph Cedar directs this film in a tense, claustrophobic way with narrow, labyrinthine corridors that burrow deep into the mountain. I was instantly reminded of the classic submarine film "Das Boot" and wasn't surprised one bit when I read that Cedar was highly influenced by that film. "Beaufort" shares several qualities with "Das Boot" such as the facelessness of the enemy (all we see are the incoming mortars & missiles), the youth & inexperience of the soldiers (Beaufort's commander is 22 and most of the soldiers are 18- 20 years old), and of course the constricting, suffocating feeling of being stuck in a steel tube while, outside, the powers that be are deciding your fate.

One notable difference between "Beaufort" and "Das Boot" are the infrequent but powerful shots of the gorgeous landscape, the humbling presence of the 12th century ruins, and other scenes of nature which lend a positive breath of fresh air to an otherwise dismal setting. This, I'm sure, was very deliberate on the part of the director, and at one point there's a nice speech where one soldier says to another, "This will all be a tourist attraction, and you can bring your girlfriend here and tell her this is where Outpost Green once was."

And that, to me, is what separates "Beaufort" from the standard "war is hell" stories. Regardless of how the story ends up, you get a feeling that eventually the majesty of nature will prevail--or should I say the stupidity of humans will fail. Same thing, I guess.

Peculiar highlights of this film include a powerful, sad song sung by one of the soldiers in the barracks, and one of the cutest war dogs ever. (And if, like me, you always cringe at animals being used in films that aren't regulated by the AHA or RSPCA, don't worry I don't believe there was any animal cruelty here.)

Other great (anti-)war films that focus on the psychology of the soldier rather than the action of battle include: the aforementioned "Das Boot" set entirely in a German submarine, "None But the Brave" about an American & a Japanese platoon each stranded on a remote island together, and an excellent war-drama-comedy from Korea called "Welcome to Dongmakgol" about N & S Korean enemies meeting in a remote village where none of the villagers are aware that a war is going on.

All of these great films can be viewed free of politics if you just ignore the uniforms. Both right-wingers & left wingers alike can find common ground with the universal thought (to quote ex-Marine talk radio host Kim Peterson), "the only point of war is to kill people and break things!"

I'm not a fan of the war genre, but Beaufort plays out more as a psychological thriller, and I find it hard to fault. There was an amazing blend of naturalism, stylistic devices, humour, touching human drama and suspense - at one time I jumped in my seat like I never have before.

The camera movements and cinematography are excellent and reinforce a sense of claustrophobia as a group of Israeli soldiers keep guard at an historic fort within southern Lebanon, but are virtually under siege by Hezbollah forces. Character development is also excellent with much authenticity. The film focuses on the idiosyncrasies of various characters and how they interact with each other under the circumstances. Respect for the commanding officer is sometimes lacking, resulting in a lack of discipline and friction at a difficult time.

I count this film as one of my favourite films in the genre, kind of a cross between Stanley Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket and Sam Mendes' Jarhead, and as good as either of these. Like these two films, there is an understated political critique in how young men are pawns in the games played by those who live comfortably away from the field of battle and death. Whether you like war films or not, this is must-see cinema.

I saw the film's screening at the Melbourne International Film Festival.

This movie is simply amazing - but as mentioned else where - might be extremely problematic for the non Israeli, non IDF serving audience. Despite that - the movie has a universal notion that shines through: occupation wars that last for years on end with no clear objective except to stay in the occupied land cannot be won. This is hardly even war - its the use of naive young men, using their sense of patriotism and love for their country and willingness to serve it for a twisted, outdated political machination that ends up killing them and putting them in impossible situations. The movie was criticized for being far too left winged, but I view it as mostly right winged - it shows the camaraderie of soldiers, the bonds that can only be created, or so it seems, in a close knit military unit. Also - there are no women in the movie, not even by voice - which further serves to show a society built on macho-ism and the devotion for young men and their sacrifices to the country. There are no talks of peace here, no talk about negotiations or even viewing the enemy as human. There is only running away or fighting. Despite all that - the movie captures a sense of reality, filled with all variants of humor and pain and longing to get home that captured me completely. I served 4 years in the IDF and this movie manages to get to the core, to the essence of the unbelievable situation of serving, fighting and dieing without knowing why, without seeing any goal or reason in the madness - only following orders.

This is one of the best Israely movies created - if you have any interest in Israely cinema, regardless of your political or other views, don't miss it.

'A more mature version of Buffalo Soldiers' would be the easy, one sentence summary for 2007 Isreali film Beaufort; a film looking at the smaller, less exciting situations and scenarios behind the larger, more significant situations and scenarios that shape certain people's lives. The film is slow, but deliberately so, pointing out the insanities of war by having the primary soldier characters sit around and eventually loose interest at the sound of shelling and warning of incoming explosive shells; thus leading to a potentially damaging mental attitude when something dangerous isn't initially treated as such. If people are to find the film slow, then the film has done its job because it avoids following a nice, neatly plotted route that instigates familiarity and a sense of accomplishment. What the characters do is a slow process, and Beaufort studies it.

Joseph Cedar's film sees a number of Isreali troops inhabit a reasonably large bunker in southern Lebanon at Beaufort Castle stronghold. The year is 2000, and the troops are a part of Isreal's army holding the area from Lebanon forces located several miles away and mostly limited to the odd rocket or shell landing on or around the area of the stronghold. The film builds to the historic IDF withdrawal, in which the Isreali troops abandoned the fort and the conflict fizzled out with a political handover. Cedar uses the time leading up to this event as a chance to deconstruct the troops; to have them indulge in any necessary acts of questioning one's role in life and in the conflict as well as document what it took for the men involved to get by; to live; to survive and, ultimately, to get by the monotony.

No, don't worry – there are no tank drivers ploughing into other vehicles whilst under the influence of drugs in this film like there are in Buffalo Soldiers. Rather than take guidance from a Cheech and Chong movie, Beaufort draws on 1981's 'Das Boot' for inspiration, at least according to Cedar himself. The inspired ideas are clear: a study of what happens in-between conflict with the enemy and how conflict with friends as well as foes can lead to everyone's downfall. Beaufort's approach to the material, that could so easily have been delivered hollowly and without much intrigue, isn't an airy and sweeping approach that relies on long, long takes of external shots of the fort. Instead, it is constructed in an uncanny sense; that this space we are inhabiting should be something to be feared, and that while conflict is sparse with gunfire and man-on-man conflict almost non-existent - that doesn't mean we are not in a war-zone of some kind in the first place.

Beaufort carries a low and pulsating noise on its musical track almost entirely throughout. It's a very obvious noise, obvious more at certain times than others, creating an eerie and uneasy sense for a lot of the close, claustrophobic shots of inside the bunker itself. This early series of exchanges, which is meant to get across the bunker as a place of fear, is actually told through the eyes of a certain soldier named Ziv (Knoller), a bomb expert specifically called in to look at a suspicious object not too far away. Since it is our first taste of the bunker at Beaufort, we get to see the dwelling through the eyes of this new recruit as fear and uncertainty washes over us as it does with Ziv. There is no doubt Cedar applies this tactic and removes Ziv from the text at the point he feels we are embedded within the locale and no longer need a rookie's viewpoint to break us in.

Some of the more uncanny items that crop up during this opening segment might include Ziv's encounter with a dummy dressed as an Isreali soldier; the manner in which the approach is constructed with the positioning of the doll and the finding out of what it is with the sudden appearance of a friendly soldier, with the rest of the film playing out under grey skies or the black of night, is unexpectedly unsettling and works really well. But this is all introduction, and the bulk of the film will revolve around several other Isreali soldiers, Koris (Tiran); Shpitzer (Perzev) and Liraz (Cohen) to name but a few. Beaufort sees fit to plunge us head first into explosive combat as many of the guys try to avoid incoming artillery shells although later on, the direct hitting of the base, drolly announced by a tannoy with the words 'impact, impact', doesn't seem to have an affect on anyone anymore.

Following the continuous so-called monotony of the shells hitting the area, there is one such incidence during which a missile of some description hits the base and everybody suddenly takes notice.The impact is a lot larger and a lot louder than the usual shells, causing panic; causing a sense of urgency. What follows is further use of sound effects as a means of the uncanny what with a bizarre diegetic/non-diegetic siren sound effect clogging up the sound tracks and disorientating the audience just as much as the characters. Beaufort is a film that documents the absurdities of war but through a relatively peaceful and mundane setting and one of its more seductive accomplishments is how it delivers a tale about essentially bored people, in a manner in which we actually find them interesting. Credit where credit's due, Beaufort works.

This film has just been aired on the Copenhagen International Film Festival and of all the Israeli films available, this was the one I was - not - going to see, and yet I did.

It is still only a few days, since I saw it, but the images return and the sheer originality in terms of being a 'war movie' coupled with the usual Jewish genius of making a point: in short comment, dry humor, body language, tone of voice, well chosen repetition i.e. the monotonous, almost dead, tone over a loudspeaker from the lookouts stationed to warn against 'incoming, incoming' missiles, which after explosion were commented on by,'impact, impact'.

After the third or fourth of these 'scenes' I suddenly felt a wave of claustrophobia and fear, which these young Israeli soldiers must have felt being stuck on a mountain top, without a visual enemy, and only lookouts to rely on for their own lives and safety, 'incoming, incoming' - crash, bang -'impact, impact' - it was unnerving.

This film is a must for anyone - also those who like me, are not war buffs, because it is not about war. It is about a lot of things. Reality, how to handle anxiety, frustration, loss, grief, in a tight and stuck environment, with no relief in sight, (Israel itself?) It is about individuality in terms of different personalities, backgrounds, political opinions who have to make it work and who do in their own humorous, gentle, aggressive, accepting way. It is about men and a male attitude which I have not witnessed for over thirty years,(and sorely missed); the honesty and humanity of men, and it is about exile.

The one lifeline to the home country; a dirt road, has been blocked by a strange explosive device for about a month, and this is where the film starts, with the bomb squad arriving at the outpost, to identify and disarm the device, so that the outpost can receive supplies once again...and a whole 'different' story is touched upon.

I could go on for hours about this film, and not in a very logical way, since all the 'points' haven't been connected yet, it has so many layers. This what I call genius - 'layering' and this is what I look for in Israeli film and this year it was Beaufort, who delivered. Go and see it.