Serpiente de fuego

A couple of campers, remembering Smokey the Bear's admonition that "only you can prevent forest fires" dutifully attempt to put out their campfire with water, only to be possessed/roasted by some angry fire entity (which occasionally growls or roars) that doesn't like water much. From there it torches or possesses anybody it can find, but it's out in the wilderness, so there aren't too many victims available. It's a smart fire creature, though, so it plots and executes a plan to...uhh, do something nasty, apparently.

Guess what? A government conspiracy, led by a lunatic who spouts off out-of-context biblical scriptures about fires, is trying to use the thing to wipe out people he doesn't like. Can you say "two-cliches-for-the-price-of-one?" Can you further believe this nut job with his "burning desire" is named (ready?) Cooke? Egad. His able assistant, unaware of his intentions, helps a firefighter find a way to extinguish the menace, with the predictable results as to who's going to end up french-fried and who survives. Theories about the invader abound: not only is it accused of apocalyptic tendencies, but apparently it came from solar flares. Because of these disjointed and impossible to reconcile backgrounds, plot holes proliferate faster than the charred bodies of victims. For example, why didn't these pyrotechnic wraiths sizzle the whole planet long ago?

The acting actually rises above the script and breathes some life into the characters' back stories and motivations. Special effects get a split-decision: some are impressive and interesting, others are just fake looking and cheap. Overall: watchable. However, nobody involved need write an Oscar acceptance speech.

I would not say this movie was akin to the usual sci-fi movies on Saturday night, but it won't be winning any awards either.

The writing was poor, however I believe the actors did the best they could with what they had – with the exception of the TV news crew women at the start. I found Nicholas Brendon's character to be the most 'believable' but they rest did as good as they could. I'm sorry but Beltran's character started off being poorly fleshed out, but by the end of the film he was over the top.

The SFX were not ILM worthy, but they were a hair better than most movies on the channel.

All in all, I found it watchable, but not very ripping. I will give the appropriate accolades to Mr. Brendon. He seems to have taken the part as far as he could with what he had. Better scripting and better directing by Shatner (although not nearly as bad as 'Star Trek: Generations' IMHO) may have made this just a wee bit better.

Sometimes you just need a silly sci-fi monster flick, you know? Even for the Sci-Fi Channel (now SyFy) where this premiered, it's hard not to be gobsmacked by the list of names that are attached to it. Writers Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens should be at least nominally familiar to anyone who has dipped their toes into modern novels of science fiction; the man himself may be dubious, but it's safe to say William Shatner is no one to sneeze at in the genre. And with Robert Beltran and Nicholas Brendon helming the cast, among others, the least that can be said for this romp is that it has some star power. Of course, the fact remains that 'Fire serpent' is an unrepentant TV movie, and no matter who is involved in such a production it seems destined for schlock - it's the nature of the genre, the medium, and the network. Still, anyone who comes across this in passing already knows what they're getting into, so there's not too much point in making a fuss. What we see is what we get, and there are no real surprises on hand; if you're looking for a cheesy, uninvolved, low-grade creature feature, look no further.

To wit: the dialogue, characters, scene writing, plot, direction, and acting are all direly forced and unconvincing, though sometimes the acting switches things up and is instead wholly underwhelming. While the computer-generated imagery isn't the worst I've ever seen, there isn't the slightest effort to blend the digital creations into the filmed footage; post-production wizardry has rarely been more transparent and obvious than it is here (case in point, watch for a death scene around the half-hour mark). In no time at all the picture becomes something that we can "watch" just by having it on in the background and not meaningfully engaging with it otherwise; this Sci-Fi lark is light, unsophisticated kitsch just as much as the Hallmark romance or the Lifetime thriller, just in its own way. On the one hand, this is a tad more inventive than some of its kin as it goes so far as to introduce far-out weaponry to combat far-out entities; on the other hand, this grows more tiresome and dull as it invokes biblical mythology. Then again, maybe all such ruminations are beside the point; 'Fire serpent' never pretends to be anything it's not.

I think the title's reach exceeds its grasp as it tries to weave in narrative elements beyond the basic concept of "aliens made of fire." Those ideas are worth exploring in and of themselves, but the tawdry nature of the TV production means this ninety-minute film probably wasn't the best place to smash them all together. Moreover, the more this tries to do within its constraints, the more contrived and tough to swallow each component part becomes; we're given a complete, cohesive story, but it feels less cohesive with each addition. No matter how weak the contributions are as they present the least that can be said is that everyone involved helped to make this happen, and I can't say the end result isn't baseline enjoyable on some level. Even with that spirit of generosity in mind, though, the picture desperately needed to trim some of its excess and focus more tightly on a much smaller number of stronger central notions. As it stands, I don't think it comes close to meeting the potential of the premise; as it stands, the entertainment 'Fire serpent' has to offer is balanced against an inability to make viewers particularly care. There are still far worse ways to spend one's time, but even if you're a diehard fan of someone involved, this is best left as something frivolous to provide mild diversion on a lazy, quiet day. Take that as you will.

......though it did have Robert Beltran - not, alas, as Chakotay. WWJD ? What Would Janeway Do ? Fire some of Voyager's inexhaustible supply of photon torpedoes, most likely. This gets 2 stars, for a decentish beginning, and a decentish end.

Well, Sci-Fi Channel did it again!! No wonder I keep watching re-runs of CSI and even Survivor!! I can't believe Nicholas Brendon, Robert Beltran and Randolph Mantooth would have ever considered doing this "movie"...that is unless since the cancellations of each of their own series', they "couldn't find work?" For Godsakes guys...do some cheesy commercials like maybe Geiko or something and I would have more respect for the each of you than I do right now!!

Before this "so-called movie" even aired, it was given a 7.something rating. What's up with that?? Color me stupid, but I was under the impression that in order to rate a movie, IT HAD TO BE WATCHED FIRST!! Or maybe given the cast line-up, IMDb members were taking for granted that this would be an excellent movie. I guess they never heard of the old saying, "Don't count your chickens BEFORE they hatch!!!!", cause instead of getting chickens, you just might get a clutch of mutant "what-evers" {sic}!! I have to admit though, the actor's performances were OK; but, I honestly believe that the Director(s) should be bitch-slapped for releasing such a lousy movie!!!

I am just glad it is over so I now have the chance to watch some really bad TV, at least "BY MY OWN choosing"!!

Remember, opinions are like ***holes; everyones got one... some stink more than others!