[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

For Your Consideration

  • 2006
  • PG-13
  • 1h 26min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.3/10
17 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
For Your Consideration (2006)
Home Video Trailer from Warner Home Video
Reproducir trailer0:32
10 videos
54 fotos
Falso documentalSátiraComedia

Tres actores se enteran de que sus respectivas actuaciones en la película "Home for Purim", un drama ambientado a mediados de la década de 1940 en el sur de Estados Unidos, están generando e... Leer todoTres actores se enteran de que sus respectivas actuaciones en la película "Home for Purim", un drama ambientado a mediados de la década de 1940 en el sur de Estados Unidos, están generando expectación durante la temporada de premios.Tres actores se enteran de que sus respectivas actuaciones en la película "Home for Purim", un drama ambientado a mediados de la década de 1940 en el sur de Estados Unidos, están generando expectación durante la temporada de premios.

  • Dirección
    • Christopher Guest
  • Guionistas
    • Christopher Guest
    • Eugene Levy
  • Elenco
    • Catherine O'Hara
    • Harry Shearer
    • Parker Posey
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    6.3/10
    17 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Christopher Guest
    • Guionistas
      • Christopher Guest
      • Eugene Levy
    • Elenco
      • Catherine O'Hara
      • Harry Shearer
      • Parker Posey
    • 171Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 94Opiniones de los críticos
    • 68Metascore
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 3 premios ganados y 14 nominaciones en total

    Videos10

    For Your Consideration
    Trailer 0:32
    For Your Consideration
    For Your Consideration
    Trailer 0:31
    For Your Consideration
    For Your Consideration
    Trailer 0:31
    For Your Consideration
    For Your Consideration
    Trailer 2:23
    For Your Consideration
    For Your Consideration
    Clip 0:57
    For Your Consideration
    For Your Consideration
    Clip 0:44
    For Your Consideration
    For Your Consideration
    Clip 0:51
    For Your Consideration

    Fotos54

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 48
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal66

    Editar
    Catherine O'Hara
    Catherine O'Hara
    • Marilyn Hack
    Harry Shearer
    Harry Shearer
    • Victor Allan Miller
    Parker Posey
    Parker Posey
    • Callie Webb
    Christopher Guest
    Christopher Guest
    • Jay Berman
    Stephen Rannazzisi
    Stephen Rannazzisi
    • Studio Gate Guard
    Ed Begley Jr.
    Ed Begley Jr.
    • Sandy Lane
    Eugene Levy
    Eugene Levy
    • Morley Orfkin
    Christopher Moynihan
    Christopher Moynihan
    • Brian Chubb
    John Michael Higgins
    John Michael Higgins
    • Corey Taft
    Carrie Aizley
    Carrie Aizley
    • Pam Campanella
    Stephanie Courtney
    Stephanie Courtney
    • Boom Operator
    Suzy Nakamura
    Suzy Nakamura
    • First AC
    Jim Piddock
    Jim Piddock
    • Simon Whitset
    Jane Morris
    Jane Morris
    • Script Supervisor
    Jennifer Coolidge
    Jennifer Coolidge
    • Whitney Taylor Brown
    Jordan Black
    Jordan Black
    • Whitney's Assistant
    Paul Dooley
    Paul Dooley
    • Paper Badge Sergeant
    John Krasinski
    John Krasinski
    • Paper Badge Officer
    • Dirección
      • Christopher Guest
    • Guionistas
      • Christopher Guest
      • Eugene Levy
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios171

    6.316.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    mouschieinstein

    For Your Consideration - A Disappointment

    The thing most Christopher Guest movies have going for them is their humanity. I always could believe the universe the characters were operating in, and their realism (see the dog owners in Best in Show or the small town citizens of Waiting for Guffman). That humanity transcended the satire and made the movies both hysterical and moving. FYC completely lost the humanity that drives these films. Almost all of the characters were not believable. In this instance Guest's improvisational technique failed him as the actors were all over the top, playing too much to the satire. Only two actors seemed in touch with their characters - Parker Posey (who we really saw too little of to understand her) and the great Catherine O'Hara, who sold both the aging actor she was portraying and the Jewish mother in the film within the film.
    6lewiskendell

    Another Christopher Guest comedy for your consideration.

    Another amusing Christopher Guest mockumentary, this time set in Hollywood and targeting the hoopla and absurdity surrounding the Oscar's and promise of a nomination. 

    It took me a little while to warm up to this one, but eventually I got into it and it had some pretty funny moments. It is really quite clever in places, and it's probably not that much of a stretch that a small movie and those involved could be swept up in the rumors of possible Academy Awards in such an extreme manner. 

    The usual Guest regulars are all here, and so is his particular sense of humor that you either get, or you don't. It's a safe bet that you'll probably like For Your Consideration about as much as you liked other Guest movies like Best in Show. Manage your expectations accordingly.
    8EUyeshima

    Skewering Oscar Buzz with Laughs and Surprising Vitriol on Guest's Non-Mockumentary Satire

    I look forward to Christopher Guest movies in the same way Ralphie did for his much beloved Red Ryder BB Gun in "A Christmas Story". Drenched with his deadpan wit, Guest's mockumentaries have been such well-targeted show business satires that it's hard to know when the script stops and the improvised reality begins. But that's a lot of the fun with his films, even though his newest is easily the most structured of the bunch. Along with constant co-writer and co-star Eugene Levy, Guest picks a target ripe with possibilities in this 2006 comedy, the Oscar-baiting season prior to the nominations, and surprisingly foregoes the direct interview format in favor of a more traditional narrative. I have to admit I miss some of this dynamic because the on-camera realism resulted in some of the funniest moments in the previous films.

    Gratefully, what has been kept from his other films is Guest's stellar ensemble company of comic actors, and this time an even larger cast has been gathered, none of whom disappoint in this outing. The plot focuses on the production of a low-budget studio-bound film, "Home for Purim", a WWII-era family melodrama about a Jewish family in Georgia coping with the mother's terminal illness and the daughter's emergence as a lesbian. Directed by an authoritarian nebbish with an Art Garfunkel hairdo named Jay Berman, the film looks to be an overly sincere piece of tripe, but a blogger on one of the movie sites has predicted leading lady Marilyn Hack, a resigned, over-the-hill B-actress, will be nominated for an Oscar. This starts an Oscar buzz that engulfs the two other nominal principals of the movie, hot-dog pitchman Victor Allen Miller and "serious" actress Callie Webb, and the tidal wave of publicity drastically changes the direction and marketing campaign of the movie even before it's completed.

    Guest and Levy fully capture the superficial pandering that occurs when the buzz is in full swing, and they particularly ridicule the ignorance and outdated thinking of those who find themselves in this lightning-in-a-bottle situation. There are acidic jabs at all the infotainment programs - "Entertainment Tonight", "MTV TRL", "The Charlie Rose Show" and "Ebert & Roeper" – but this is character-driven farce, and several stand out. In a brave turn as Marilyn, the wonderful and ever-dependable Catherine O'Hara superbly captures the almost overnight evolution from forgotten, timeworn actress into botox-infused, cleavage-squeezing A-lister wannabe. Harry Shearer gets his best showcase yet as the put-upon Victor whose mouthy agent Morley Orfkin refuses to take his calls until the buzz hits them. As Callie, Parker Posey is more in reactive mode here, though she has a funny Sandra Bernhard-like bit with her character's one-woman show, "No Penis Intended".

    Everyone else gets less screen time, but they all provide memorably riotous contributions – Guest as Berman, Levy as Morley, Jennifer Coolidge as clueless producer Whitney Taylor Brown, John Michael Higgins as bromide-spouting publicist Corey Taft, Don Lake and Michael Hitchcock as the Love It/Hate It movie critics, Michael McKean and Bob Balaban as the academic screenwriters, Ed Begley Jr. as Marilyn's fey hairdresser (and biggest fan), Ricky Gervais as the oily studio honcho, and best of all, as the entertainment TV co-hosts, Fred Willard as mohawk-moussed Chuck Porter and Jane Lynch as gam-showcasing Mary Hart-knockoff Cindy Martin. I imagine Guest's reputation is the reason you see such high-profile actors like Sandra Oh and Craig Bierko in nothing more than bit parts here. The film takes a sharp turn toward the end that adds surprising vitriol to the laughs, and the vituperative tone makes the proceedings all the more devastating and resonant. More like "A Mighty Wind" with its dramatic undercurrents, this one is not as laugh-out-loud as "Waiting for Guffman" and "Best in Show", but it shows a continuing maturation in Guest's film-making technique that is most welcome.
    lor_

    Fans missed out on the central, mean-spirited "in joke" here

    Having just searched through 137 IMDb comments (whew!) of Guest's film I was quite surprised that nobody noticed the central in-joke at work here, one that spoiled an otherwise mildly amusing effort for me. I guess you have to be a film industry insider, or at least have a working knowledge of film history, to analyze these seemingly transparent recent movies, and everyone struck out.

    The central character, played so winningly by Catherine O'Hara, is obviously based on a real-life actress and her Oscar campaign. The real Hollywood actors, namely the typical Academy members who make up the Oscar voting population that selects the nominees annually, will instantly recognize who I'm referring to, even though those intrepid IMDb addicts dropped the ball. The answer is plainly Sally Kirkland, a talented character actress who indeed was nominated for best actress in 1987 for her performance in the indie film ANNA. I knew Sally quite well at the time, and she was completely sincere in the campaign she launched, unsuccessfully, to try and win the coveted Oscar, losing out to Cher for MOONSTRUCK that year. Her campaigning predated what has become merely customary, as the Weinsteins later perfected the art of actively manipulating Academy voters to get annual nominations and wins for their various Miramax (subsequently TWC) films, right up through somehow managing a Penelope Cruz nom for "Nine".

    Sally's large breast implants are an easy target for O'Hara here, with Willard's funny line about her décolletage after interviewing her post-Oscar snub: "Now I've seen the Grand Canyon". For the uninitiated, if you click on Sally's IMDb page you will see how her face in the '80s/'90s closely resembles the look O'Hara captured in her impressive bit of "frozen visage" acting of the final reels of Guest's satire. I shudder to think of how Nicole Kidman, Jessica Lange and Meg Ryan will fare as potential future targets of the merciless Guest/O'Hara team.

    We all know from numerous lectures by the latter-day greats like Steve Martin that "comedy isn't pretty". But I was disappointed at Guest and company taking potshots at Ms. Kirkland. She is a sincere artist and while everyone in the entertainment world is out there available for ridicule I was taken aback by the somewhat underhanded, infra dig lampooning here. Knowing Sally I'm sure she took it in her stride when FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION was released, but no one likes to be mocked. Even masochists would prefer some old-fashioned corporal punishment to being humiliated in front of their peers.

    As an aside, I admire the talent of these comedy geniuses, including Levy and Guest. But I think a telling anecdote of an incident I witnessed long ago shows that many of them have feet of clay. As a film critic I was attending the press screening for about 50 people at Magno on Times Square in NYC in 1980 for the new film THE FIRST DEADLY SIN, starring Frank Sinatra and Faye Dunaway. The film when released soon after was not successful with critics or audiences and proved to be Frank's final big-screen role, in fact his only movie role after 1970. There is an etiquette at press screenings, but not just critics are invited. Sitting near me was Harry Shearer (a key member of Guest's stock company, and of course immortal from his THIS IS SPINAL TAP participation), whom I recognized immediately from his Saturday NIGHT LIVE appearances plus a friend who I couldn't place. Starting a few minutes into the Sinatra film, which was a gritty, NYC-set thriller, the two of them launched into a series of catcalls and shout-out jokey remarks at the expense of the movie that would have made the yet-to-be-invented stars of MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATRE 3000 proud, or fit well within the current drag queen-led mocking of movies that goes on weekly at my local Chelsea cinema. I even shushed them (!) to no avail. This uncouth behavior stuck with me, and always made me wonder about the sincerity of comics at the level of talent, which I readily concede, of a Shearer, or a Second City denizen. I know contemporary comedians famously study people they see on the street, subway, etc. in ordinary life to build material, but the disrespectful attitude of Shearer & bud toward Sinatra, Dunaway and their earnest (if not at the top of their game) movie collaborators appalled me no end. It's not surprising that poor Faye met a similar fate the following year with the release of MOMMIE DEAREST, which stands as perhaps the most-ridiculed and campy of modern Hollywood releases.
    7Danusha_Goska

    I Liked It, In Spite of the Negative Reviews It Received

    I don't have much to say about "For Your Consideration," except that I liked it, in spite of the negative reviews it received, and I wanted to say that here in case other viewers, like me, put off viewing it because the reviews put us off.

    "For Your Consideration" is a small, brief (86 minutes), sweet, funny movie. It's not as laugh-out-loud funny as "Best in Show" (few movies are) but I liked it better than "Mighty Wind," which I also liked.

    Christopher Guest's usual crew is in its usual fine form. Catherine O'Hara is funny in a whole new way, with at least one scene that is quite poignant and unforgettable, at least to struggling artists. John Michael Higgins does a very funny William H. Macy-like character. Jane Lynch is dead-on as an "Entertainment Tonight" style tabloid "journalist."

    I even liked the ventriloquist Nina Conti -- and I normally run from the room when a ventriloquist comes on.

    Más como esto

    A Mighty Wind
    7.2
    A Mighty Wind
    El experto
    7.4
    El experto
    Best in Show
    7.5
    Best in Show
    Mascots
    5.8
    Mascots
    This Is Spinal Tap
    7.9
    This Is Spinal Tap
    Family Tree
    7.4
    Family Tree
    The Big Picture
    6.2
    The Big Picture
    Loudon Wainwright III: Surviving Twin
    6.8
    Loudon Wainwright III: Surviving Twin
    The Thick of It
    8.6
    The Thick of It
    6.5
    D.O.A.
    Spinal Tap: Break Like the Wind - The Videos
    6.9
    Spinal Tap: Break Like the Wind - The Videos
    Héroes por casualidad
    5.8
    Héroes por casualidad

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      As is with all other Christopher Guest films, very little of the movie has a detailed script. Guest generally writes an outline so that the actors know what needs to happen in the scene, does a maximum of two or three takes, and has no rehearsals prior to filming.
    • Errores
      The title of the French film the actress is nominated for is incorrectly named 'Le cheval obscurite'. 'Obscurite' is the noun form of dark, the adjective form 'obscur' should have been used. At any rate, the expression 'dark horse' isn't directly translated as thus in French.
    • Citas

      Lane Iverson: You can't throw the baby out with the bathwater because then all you have is a wet, critically injured baby.

    • Conexiones
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: A Good Year/Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus/For Your Consideration/Harsh Times/Copying Beethoven (2006)
    • Bandas sonoras
      Julie
      from Jezabel (1938)

      Written by Max Steiner

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes19

    • How long is For Your Consideration?Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 22 de noviembre de 2006 (Estados Unidos)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Sitio oficial
      • Warner Bros. (United States)
    • Idiomas
      • Inglés
      • Francés
    • También se conoce como
      • Nominados
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Culver Studios - 9336 W. Washington Blvd., Culver City, California, Estados Unidos(as Culver Studios, Culver City, California, filmed at)
    • Productoras
      • Shangri-La Entertainment
      • Castle Rock Entertainment
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • USD 12,000,000 (estimado)
    • Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 5,549,923
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 372,012
      • 19 nov 2006
    • Total a nivel mundial
      • USD 5,925,637
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 1h 26min(86 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • SDDS
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.