CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.8/10
1.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaWith the destruction of Fontainhas nearly complete, the old man Ventura wanders around a bleak housing project and the ruins of the slums, meeting with his kids and old friends.With the destruction of Fontainhas nearly complete, the old man Ventura wanders around a bleak housing project and the ruins of the slums, meeting with his kids and old friends.With the destruction of Fontainhas nearly complete, the old man Ventura wanders around a bleak housing project and the ruins of the slums, meeting with his kids and old friends.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 7 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
First off, I love the majority of reviews posted here.
I had to throw in my two cents though.
Director/Writer Pedro Costa is first an artist. This movie is part of a set of movies that can be dark, depressing, and at times even boring to watch but at the same time every shot and frame is done with a beauty and artistic message behind it. It can even be magical to watch at times. That hope can be found in it as well just adds to the message and beauty.
Half of me wishes his movies were not so long but the other half would say what would the Mona Lisa be like if it had been rushed and done in 90 minutes.
I had to throw in my two cents though.
Director/Writer Pedro Costa is first an artist. This movie is part of a set of movies that can be dark, depressing, and at times even boring to watch but at the same time every shot and frame is done with a beauty and artistic message behind it. It can even be magical to watch at times. That hope can be found in it as well just adds to the message and beauty.
Half of me wishes his movies were not so long but the other half would say what would the Mona Lisa be like if it had been rushed and done in 90 minutes.
10jojokyra
Sometimes I watch drama to feel "thrust out from the depths."
This is not a drama. This is in a way real and I didnt want to relate.
It is like this poor soul that I pass on the street and I didn't want to see again.
I can not actually like any of this characters. It is close to the ugly true. It is unpleasant to watch. The poverty smells very bad. I cant really accept even the metaphorical beginning as such.
It is skillfully shot. Light, composition - it is like a painting. A painting by Vincent van Gogh. It have the same dull colors as "The Potato Eaters". But except any presence of God.
My rating didn't matter. "I dint like it" doesn't mean nothing. The consummation term "rating" cant apply to this movie.
It is like this poor soul that I pass on the street and I didn't want to see again.
I can not actually like any of this characters. It is close to the ugly true. It is unpleasant to watch. The poverty smells very bad. I cant really accept even the metaphorical beginning as such.
It is skillfully shot. Light, composition - it is like a painting. A painting by Vincent van Gogh. It have the same dull colors as "The Potato Eaters". But except any presence of God.
My rating didn't matter. "I dint like it" doesn't mean nothing. The consummation term "rating" cant apply to this movie.
Ventura wanders around the fast-disappearing Lisbon slum called Fontainhas, running into his daughter, an old man guarding an empty open-air market, the locksmith who lets him into his new apartment, and assorted people whom he may or may not know. He. Drinks. And plays card games, noisily slapping the cards down. He complains that his wife has left him. After an hour or so, the fourth or fifth time he says she wanted one hundred thousand cigarettes, a car, a lava house, a forty-cent bouquet an a bottle of wine, I gave up and stopped watching.
This is the third movie in Pedro Costa's trilogy about the dead-end lives of people in Fontainhas. In the first, people seem emotionally inert. I have not seen the second, and these two don't encourage me in trying to. Here, at least, Ventura knows something is wrong, but the rituals with the card play and the repeated complaint makes me think he's been saying this for a long time. I understand the pleasure in airing grievances, but this looks like the empty aftermath of what might have once been a life, an anti-existential echo in which Hell is not other people, but yourself.
This is the third movie in Pedro Costa's trilogy about the dead-end lives of people in Fontainhas. In the first, people seem emotionally inert. I have not seen the second, and these two don't encourage me in trying to. Here, at least, Ventura knows something is wrong, but the rituals with the card play and the repeated complaint makes me think he's been saying this for a long time. I understand the pleasure in airing grievances, but this looks like the empty aftermath of what might have once been a life, an anti-existential echo in which Hell is not other people, but yourself.
This film is an immersion in poverty: although each photographic set-up is richly subtle and brilliantly composed, the subject matter of the film deals with the poverty brought on by the destruction of the past, by the loss of jobs and family and community.
It should be stated at the onset that probably, were this film were shown in the average theatrical multiplex, 98% of the audience would walk out in the first fifteen or twenty minutes, as the pace is glacial, there is no plot to speak of, dialogue is fitful and seems to be aimless (although if one listens carefully, the effect is cumulatively meaningful) and there is almost no camera movement whatever--single set-ups are made and the viewer often sees the same scene for fifteen or twenty minutes.
As many reviews have noticed, there are definitive echoes of Samuel Beckett in the "I cant go on--I'll go on" mood that characterizes much of the absurdity of modern existence, and visually there are echoes of Vermeer--well, enough. If you want action, laughs, logic and easy entertainment this film ain't it; most people would hate sitting through any of this--if, however, you want an intellectual challenge from a thoughtful filmmaker, this might be in your queue--but don't expect the usual feel-good art film.
It should be stated at the onset that probably, were this film were shown in the average theatrical multiplex, 98% of the audience would walk out in the first fifteen or twenty minutes, as the pace is glacial, there is no plot to speak of, dialogue is fitful and seems to be aimless (although if one listens carefully, the effect is cumulatively meaningful) and there is almost no camera movement whatever--single set-ups are made and the viewer often sees the same scene for fifteen or twenty minutes.
As many reviews have noticed, there are definitive echoes of Samuel Beckett in the "I cant go on--I'll go on" mood that characterizes much of the absurdity of modern existence, and visually there are echoes of Vermeer--well, enough. If you want action, laughs, logic and easy entertainment this film ain't it; most people would hate sitting through any of this--if, however, you want an intellectual challenge from a thoughtful filmmaker, this might be in your queue--but don't expect the usual feel-good art film.
Some films make you happy, some films make you cry, and some film make you really really bored. This is one in the last category. I saw this film on the International Film Festival Rotterdam and it was the first film ever I walked out of. I really wanted to see this film, but after 30 minutes I couldn't help falling asleep. Luckily someone woke me up. Looking around I saw dozens of people sleeping. Halfway through the film my friends wanted to leave and, honestly, I didn't mind.
The films consists of very static, long takes, focusing on the very dreary lives of the main characters, who are trying to get their lives back together. The images are bereft of all liveliness, with their coarse grain, little colour and bad lighting. Most of the scenes take place in only a few areas ans nothing seems to happen, apart from useless conversations going on forever. Where some films are capable of making an interesting story about subjects as boredom (e.g. 25 Watts) or decay, the part of this film I saw hardly aroused any of my senses. Perhaps the only interesting thing about the atmosphere in the film is the claustrophobic, closed-in feeling that it evokes.
"Art films", if it can be called a genre, can be great.. but only go see this when you need some sleep!
The films consists of very static, long takes, focusing on the very dreary lives of the main characters, who are trying to get their lives back together. The images are bereft of all liveliness, with their coarse grain, little colour and bad lighting. Most of the scenes take place in only a few areas ans nothing seems to happen, apart from useless conversations going on forever. Where some films are capable of making an interesting story about subjects as boredom (e.g. 25 Watts) or decay, the part of this film I saw hardly aroused any of my senses. Perhaps the only interesting thing about the atmosphere in the film is the claustrophobic, closed-in feeling that it evokes.
"Art films", if it can be called a genre, can be great.. but only go see this when you need some sleep!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFamed film critic Roger Ebert turned down the chance to watch this movie at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival, after discovering his colleague Richard Corliss and his wife had walked out of a screening twenty minutes in. According to Ebert, Mary Corliss said "the movie made her feel like rats were fighting in her skull."
- ConexionesFeatured in The Story of Film: A New Generation (2021)
- Bandas sonorasLabanta braço
Written by Os Tubarões
Performed by Os Tubarões
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Colossal Youth?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Colossal Youth
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 12,801
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 2h 36min(156 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta