CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.0/10
50 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Jon y Garfield visitan el Reino Unido, donde un caso de identidad felina equivocada deja a Garfield gobernando un castillo. Su reinado pronto se ve comprometido por el infame Lord Dargis, qu... Leer todoJon y Garfield visitan el Reino Unido, donde un caso de identidad felina equivocada deja a Garfield gobernando un castillo. Su reinado pronto se ve comprometido por el infame Lord Dargis, que tiene planes sobre la propiedad.Jon y Garfield visitan el Reino Unido, donde un caso de identidad felina equivocada deja a Garfield gobernando un castillo. Su reinado pronto se ve comprometido por el infame Lord Dargis, que tiene planes sobre la propiedad.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 4 nominaciones en total
Bill Murray
- Garfield
- (voz)
Vernee Watson
- Tourist #2
- (as Vernée Watson Johnson)
Bryce Lenon
- Police Sergeant
- (as Bryce Lennon)
Judith Shekoni
- Tour Guide
- (as Judi Shekoni)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
OK, I admit that I watched this movie. But thankfully I watched it on a pirate DVD bought for two dollars from a dodgy looking bloke on Sadovaya Triumfalnaya in Moscow. He liked my girlfriend's red shoes and said they looked like the shoes of a Princess, which she is of course. I like her red shoes too, they are very nice shoes. They have embroidery and flat heels, but they got very wet when we got caught in the rain the day we went to Novospassky Monastery. Neither of us had a jacket or an umbrella so we got pretty wet but it was worth it because the monastery is beautiful. If you ever go to Moscow you should pay this place a visit, it's stunningly beautiful. Go to Taganskaya on the Circular line and it's a five minute walk along Kamenshiki Street, or at least it should be if you go with someone who knows how to read a street map. Still, it was a nice walk in the rain and we got there eventually even though the red shoes got very wet. Now, being that Novospassky is a Russian Orthodox monastery, women must cover their heads and must also cover their shoulders and should not be wearing trousers or short skirts. Red shoes are OK. So just inside the main gate there is a big box of scarves, shawls and wrap around skirts for the use of any women that may be unsuitably attired for entry into the church, and I must say that my beautiful girlfriend looked rather wonderful wearing all these things. I have pictures if you would like to see them. The inside of the church is decorated with painted walls and ceilings and there are stunning golden icons that look fabulous in the candlelight. There are no electric lights. The Russian choir sings and the priests walk around among the congregation, who stand and chant, there are no seats. It is one of the most spiritual experiences you'll ever have. Quite extraordinary. It is almost like being transported back to some medieval age. Anyway, why am I telling you all of this? Quite simply because it is much more interesting than talking about this movie. As I said, I, or should I say we, watched it on a dodgy pirate DVD that was on sale the day after the movie opened in Moscow. This, as it turned out, was a very good thing because it meant that I couldn't see or hear the movie very well so we turned it off after 20 minutes and that's the best way to watch it in my opinion.
The red shoes still look great though.
The red shoes still look great though.
It was FUN!
I had a good time watching the movie. I didn't get bored, I laughed more than a couple of times. I truly liked Garfield. I mean that cat has really good a sense of humor.
The plot was fine, the dialogs were brilliant. Garfield was fine. Even, Odie had his moment.
The animation could have been better but it really wasn't that bad. I can watch is again. Everything someone looks for in Garfield was there. So, I wasn't disappointed and I have no idea why people were.
If you ask me, watch it. Cause it is fun and that is enough.
I had a good time watching the movie. I didn't get bored, I laughed more than a couple of times. I truly liked Garfield. I mean that cat has really good a sense of humor.
The plot was fine, the dialogs were brilliant. Garfield was fine. Even, Odie had his moment.
The animation could have been better but it really wasn't that bad. I can watch is again. Everything someone looks for in Garfield was there. So, I wasn't disappointed and I have no idea why people were.
If you ask me, watch it. Cause it is fun and that is enough.
Why do people hate Garfield? The overall story of the first film was better than the second, I admit that.
It's about the cat and as long as the cat is brilliant, which he is. Then I think it's an alright film.
1:-Billy Connolly shouldn't have been the lead bad guy.
2:-Bill Murray is excellent as Garfield. So is the animation.
3:-They should take Garfield back to America and make a 3rd.
When Garfield stopped the train in the first film. Someone behind me said "Thats far fetched". Like everything up to then was realistic.
Don't get me wrong people can hate films what other people like. But it's people who say comments like that above. That us Garfield fans have to put up with.
"When in a rush dress slowly". Don't know who said this, but I like it.
It's about the cat and as long as the cat is brilliant, which he is. Then I think it's an alright film.
1:-Billy Connolly shouldn't have been the lead bad guy.
2:-Bill Murray is excellent as Garfield. So is the animation.
3:-They should take Garfield back to America and make a 3rd.
When Garfield stopped the train in the first film. Someone behind me said "Thats far fetched". Like everything up to then was realistic.
Don't get me wrong people can hate films what other people like. But it's people who say comments like that above. That us Garfield fans have to put up with.
"When in a rush dress slowly". Don't know who said this, but I like it.
I did not like the first 'Garfield'-film, and although this sequel is an improvement I didn't care much for this one as well. Too many talking animals and a story involving a mix-up, which is too simple to begin with, make a boring movie out of elements we have seen many times before.
The mix-up is between Garfield and Prince, a London cat who just inherited a whole castle. The inhabitant of that castle, Lord Dargis (Billy Connolly), thought he would have it all. Only after the cat is dead and buried the place will be his. He gets rid off Prince, but the loyal butler Smithee (Ian Abercrombie) finds him back, only it is Garfield instead of Prince. Now owner Jon (Breckin Meyer) finds Prince, thinking it is Garfield. He is in London for a subplot involving his love Liz (Jennifer Love Hewitt) who he wants to marry.
As in the first film it is Bill Murray as the voice of Garfield who can bring the occasional smile to your face. Again the dancing sequences, one repeating a famous mirror scene from the Marx Brothers, belong to the highlights. 'A Tale of Two Kitties' contains some more laughs than the first film, but should be seen as another failure. I am not sure whether a good film about this character can be made, but better than this seems quite possible.
The mix-up is between Garfield and Prince, a London cat who just inherited a whole castle. The inhabitant of that castle, Lord Dargis (Billy Connolly), thought he would have it all. Only after the cat is dead and buried the place will be his. He gets rid off Prince, but the loyal butler Smithee (Ian Abercrombie) finds him back, only it is Garfield instead of Prince. Now owner Jon (Breckin Meyer) finds Prince, thinking it is Garfield. He is in London for a subplot involving his love Liz (Jennifer Love Hewitt) who he wants to marry.
As in the first film it is Bill Murray as the voice of Garfield who can bring the occasional smile to your face. Again the dancing sequences, one repeating a famous mirror scene from the Marx Brothers, belong to the highlights. 'A Tale of Two Kitties' contains some more laughs than the first film, but should be seen as another failure. I am not sure whether a good film about this character can be made, but better than this seems quite possible.
"Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties," directed by Tim Hill, is the sequel to the 2004 film, bringing back Bill Murray as the voice of Garfield. This time, the lasagna-loving feline finds himself in England, where he is mistaken for a royal cat named Prince. The plot thickens with Garfield enjoying the luxurious life while his friends Jon (Breckin Meyer) and Odie get entangled in his adventure.
The film is light-hearted and filled with comedic moments typical of Garfield's character. However, much like its predecessor, it relies heavily on slapstick humor and predictable gags. The storyline, inspired by "The Prince and the Pauper," offers a few charming moments but doesn't stray far from formulaic family movie tropes.
While children might enjoy the antics and visuals, adult fans of the original comic strip might find it lacking in the clever wit and depth that make Garfield timeless. Overall, "Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties" provides some entertainment and nostalgic value but ultimately delivers a middling experience.
The film is light-hearted and filled with comedic moments typical of Garfield's character. However, much like its predecessor, it relies heavily on slapstick humor and predictable gags. The storyline, inspired by "The Prince and the Pauper," offers a few charming moments but doesn't stray far from formulaic family movie tropes.
While children might enjoy the antics and visuals, adult fans of the original comic strip might find it lacking in the clever wit and depth that make Garfield timeless. Overall, "Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties" provides some entertainment and nostalgic value but ultimately delivers a middling experience.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaSir Billy Connolly admitted in an interview that when he was offered the role of Lord Dargis in this movie, he wasn't aware that Garfield: la película (2004) existed.
- ErroresWhen Jon is driving to the castle to find Garfield, he's driving on the wrong side of the road. In the UK they drive on the left side. Jon was on the right side.
- Versiones alternativasThe U.S. DVD includes both the PG-rated theatrical version and an extended version (obviously unrated, but not labeled as such). The theatrical version runs 1:17:45, while the extended version is approximately 8 minutes longer at a runtime of 1:25:35. The theatrical version is presented in 4:3 fullscreen, while the extended version is presented in 16:9 widescreen.
- ConexionesFeatured in Troldspejlet: Episode #34.16 (2006)
- Bandas sonorasThe Angels Sang
Written and Performed by Ronnie James
Courtesy of Smashtrax Music LLC
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Garfield 2
- Locaciones de filmación
- Castle Howard, York, North Yorkshire, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Castle Carlyle: exteriors of house, bridge and lakes)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 60,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 28,426,747
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 7,288,977
- 18 jun 2006
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 143,325,970
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 22min(82 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta