CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.3/10
1.4 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una narración del relato bíblico donde Moisés regresa a Egipto para liberar a los hebreos de la esclavitud.Una narración del relato bíblico donde Moisés regresa a Egipto para liberar a los hebreos de la esclavitud.Una narración del relato bíblico donde Moisés regresa a Egipto para liberar a los hebreos de la esclavitud.
- Nominado a 3 premios Primetime Emmy
- 1 premio ganado y 6 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
I read bad reviews of this one after the other before I saw this and I was prepared not to like this. My friend bought this for $5.00 about a year and a half ago and it became one of those DVDs that sits unwatched in storage. Being Easter Sunday and not being able to access either the 1956 version or Ben-Hur, we decided to give this a spin. I was surprised at how good this was. This was a somewhat grittier version of the story, but, as it is explained in a "making-of" documentary extra on the disc, this was the film maker's intent. The production values are excellent as is the music score. The 3-hour film is broken into two parts, thus allowing a natural "intermission". The acting is good, the direction is good and it really holds your attention so what's not to like?
This was a mess. The continuity was a mess -half the actors spoke with English accents, King Herod looked like he never saw the sun, and the darkest person was Naveen Andrews who, while a fine actor, seemed out of place. Come on. Finally, out of all the great actors with tremendous voices, (James Earl Jones), the voice of God sounded like the local pizza delivery guy.
One good thing was the special effects and showing the darker side of the story. And the actors though, a little overly dramatic at times, did a pretty good job.
I haven't seen the original in a while, but will check it out this week 2 compare.
One good thing was the special effects and showing the darker side of the story. And the actors though, a little overly dramatic at times, did a pretty good job.
I haven't seen the original in a while, but will check it out this week 2 compare.
The Ten Commandments (2006) Mini Series is the easily weakest attempt to adpat this story while still having some great moments.
Positives for The Ten Commandments (2006): Like the previous adaptations, this is a great story that everyone needs to watch because it is such a rich story that needs to be appreciated. There are some good performances here while also being among the weaker end of these characters. And finally, there are some great shots of the desert landscape here.
Negatives for The Ten Commandments (2006): This is a story of two halves with Part 1 being very good and Part 2 being very boring. Even with that being said, I found Part 1 to be the weakest version of this story. The pacing of this TV Mini Series is so slow which is odd to said because the runtime is almost 3-hours and The Ten Commandments (1956) runtime was almost 4-hours and that movie's pacing was significantly better than this TV Mini Series. And finally, the effects are not very good and feel like they came straight out of an Atari game.
Overall, The Ten Commandments (2006) is easily the weakest adaptation of this story that I've seen so far.
Positives for The Ten Commandments (2006): Like the previous adaptations, this is a great story that everyone needs to watch because it is such a rich story that needs to be appreciated. There are some good performances here while also being among the weaker end of these characters. And finally, there are some great shots of the desert landscape here.
Negatives for The Ten Commandments (2006): This is a story of two halves with Part 1 being very good and Part 2 being very boring. Even with that being said, I found Part 1 to be the weakest version of this story. The pacing of this TV Mini Series is so slow which is odd to said because the runtime is almost 3-hours and The Ten Commandments (1956) runtime was almost 4-hours and that movie's pacing was significantly better than this TV Mini Series. And finally, the effects are not very good and feel like they came straight out of an Atari game.
Overall, The Ten Commandments (2006) is easily the weakest adaptation of this story that I've seen so far.
I think it's missing the point to expect this to be like DeMille's version. I wasn't crazy about part one, as it didn't seem to know what it was -- epic movie or historical drama. But part two falls more into the historical drama category. There it works much better for me.
The actual story (miracles aside) of how the Israelites became a cohesive people is one that has not often been explored. Haven't watched part two to the end, so can't say if it will disappoint. But I do find the idea of former slaves having to carve their way, battles and all, across the wilderness to be an interesting point of view.
Will say that the character development and some of the acting (in part one) left a lot to be desired. But, again, that seemed to work better in part two. I think looking at this as a story in itself, instead of comparing it to some '50's Hollywood extravaganza, is the fair approach, no matter how it turns out.
The actual story (miracles aside) of how the Israelites became a cohesive people is one that has not often been explored. Haven't watched part two to the end, so can't say if it will disappoint. But I do find the idea of former slaves having to carve their way, battles and all, across the wilderness to be an interesting point of view.
Will say that the character development and some of the acting (in part one) left a lot to be desired. But, again, that seemed to work better in part two. I think looking at this as a story in itself, instead of comparing it to some '50's Hollywood extravaganza, is the fair approach, no matter how it turns out.
I watched this series out of curiosity,wanting to see if they could possibly and with ALL this modern technology,out do Cecil B. DeMille's classic epic of 1956, starring Charleton Heston,Yul Brenner and Sir Cedric Hardwicke. Of course, I was let down. Yes, they had all the Biblical characters correct, but they didn't give us any of the spectacular theatrical scenes, that held your interest throughout the first movie. If you going to have a mini-series, you have to have some "rivoting" scenes, the "Burning bush", Parting the "RED Sea",drowning "Pharohs Armies", "building Sethi's Pyramids", could have been done with todays' technology on the scale of blockbuster movies such as "Lord of the Rings" or the Matrix. Obviously, they didn't want to leave a LASTING impression of "faith and sacrifice", which is much needed in these trouble times.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe infant playing baby Moses was named Moses in real life after his mother, an extra in the series, gave birth to him during the making of the series. The director ask her if they could cast him as Moses and she was so honored that she named the baby after him.
- ConexionesReferenced in The Making of 'The Ten Commandments' (2006)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does The Ten Commandments have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- The Ten Commandments
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Los diez mandamientos (2006)?
Responda