Salvador (Puig Antich)

In 1974 the young anarchistic bank-robber Salvador Puig Antich is executed after spending some time in jail. His death starts a period of unrest in Spain, at that time still ruled by the dictator Franco. That unrest is the beginning of democracy in Spain.

This film plays the last months in the life of Salvador. It gives a short insight into his life, his why and what and the choices he makes. It then rolls on to his time in jail and all that follows.

Biographic pictures like this one stand or fall with the capability of the actors to play their real life counterparts convincingly. This film stands. It does a very good job at dramatizing the actual events and left me with a giant lump in my throat.

9 out of 10 accidental heroes.

I've seen this film today, and although I wouldn't say it's great film wise, I think it's important for people to know about recent history, especially Spaniards. I'm totally against death penalty, and this film has only reassured me in the matter. But I must say the film is somehow partial, as Salvador was in fact a bank robber, no matter what he used the money for. The acting is quite impressive. I must confess I wasn't too convinced about Daniel playing Salvador, as he's German, but he's great. Tristán Ulloa is also very good, and he speaks really good Catalán, sounding native although he's actually Galician (north west Spain). And finally Leonardo Sbaraglia plays an impressive policeman. Incredibly, you forget he's an Argentinian sex symbol and does a really good Spanish accent.Also, I may be a bit impartial myself, since I know the sister of one of Salvador friends in the film and about the family suffer...

Historical memory films often tread difficult ground, and Salvador (Puig Antich) does so with uncommon intensity. From the start, Manuel Huerga applies a powerful visual style that gives weight to the story of the Catalan anarchist executed by the Franco regime in 1974. The film doesn't hold back, throwing us directly into his inevitable fate, but before that, it presents Salvador as a human being-one with ideals, flaws, and a life that was taken away without mercy.

Daniel Brühl delivers an exceptional performance, portraying a character who feels alive even in the quietest moments. His evolution throughout the film is brutal, and when the final moments arrive, the anguish he conveys is difficult to shake off. Huerga's direction is another strong point, though the first section, centered on the heists, has a stylized approach reminiscent of Argentine cinema rather than raw realism. Fortunately, once the film shifts focus to the trial and the days leading up to the execution, everything becomes much more visceral, direct, and devastating.

One of the film's greatest achievements is how it avoids empty idealization or forced nostalgia. There are no one-dimensional heroes or villains here-just a story that hurts because it was real and still echoes today. The script masterfully builds tension, making every scene in the final stretch feel like a punch to the gut.

Despite some questionable aesthetic choices in the opening, Salvador is an incredibly powerful film. It doesn't just retell Puig Antich's story-it does so with a sensitivity and precision rarely seen in Spanish cinema. A sharp, unforgiving dose of reality that leaves its mark.

I don't disagree with the view that the subject is quite appropriate for a movie but displays quite gruesome violence, almost senseless for an artistic product. The scenes leading to the execution of the sentence are particularly distressing are particularly lengthy, the sentence itself is really perturbing for such a kind of movie. Other than that the movie is supposed to accurately reflect the violent times around 1970 in the Western World, and hopefully does achieve that target. Have to admit that, however, good acting and good direction are displayed throughout the movie, the main weakness of the movie can be found in the script only.

i can't help wondering what the point of this film pamphlet was. it seemed to veer towards naive heroism in the beginning and at the end again, meanwhile completely neglecting a discussion of what set these people apart from other 'normal' terrorists. and then we get a subplot of the last death penalty dealt in Spain with this kid who of course doesn't deserve to be murdered at the hands of the state, but who does really. it fails on this level as well as a level of human relationship, using the story of the guard merely to make a point of how the revolution lives on.

so i felt really ambiguous and detached from the film, which seemed so uncommitted to an involved and deep discussion of its story.