El apóstol de Lucifer

When I read the book "The Visitation" by Frank Peretti, I couldn't put it down. I loved every minute of it, and recommended it to all my friends and family as a "must-read". Mr. Peretti is a talented author, and has a way of pulling the reader into a story that twists and turns and keeps the reader on their toes. The movie did the the exact opposite. I realize that it is rare that a movie comes close to being as good as the book, but I was hopeful that the spirit of the book, the feeling of the book, or at least the BASIC story of the book be represented well in the movie. It wasn't. Sadly, it fell into the stereotype of a "christian-made" movie. Medeocre. (Which I find frustrating). This was an excellent book, with an excellent story to tell, and it did not deserve to be butchered the way it did. Not only was the story hacked to bits, but the acting was lacking and the cinematography at times was confusing and distracting. As much as I loved and recommended the book, I have to say that this is a movie to avoid.

I rented this movie recently. I never read the original novel, but I knew of Frank Peretti's works. Honestly, I wasn't expecting anything great, but I must say I was surprised to find the film pretty good. Not earth shattering good, but quite a decent flick. For a low-budget, direct to DVD supernatural thriller, I think it's a step above the usual. Quality wise the acting, direction, and special effects is better than most faith based films like "Left Behind". The mystery element to the plot is what kept me watching. Trying to figure out what's happening is what I think helps drive the story. There is suspense, but it's not really too scary. However, I would recommend parents to watch this film with children under 13. I think the PG-13 rating is quite appropriate for the film's content. In the end, "The Visitation" is overall a good picture. Nothing I would buy, but something worthwhile to rent. Recommended.

Horror movies with religious themes seem to be everywhere these days. I mean, some joker even had the nerve to re-make "The Omen". While The Visitation does not quite belong to the upper echelon of religious horror, it is certainly one of the more accomplished efforts in recent years, largely due to its stellar cast and Robby Henson's steadfast direction.

Without giving away too much, The Visitation is an adaptation of Frank Peretti's novel about a young man, Brandon, who appears in a small town and begins performing miracles. Before too long the locals consider Brandon to be the embodiment of Christ and start acting like his disciples. The problem is that Brandon's powers seem to be coming from below, instead of above. While the story is not incredibly original, it is treated with intelligence and sincerity. The film takes time to develop the supporting characters, such as the disillusioned ex-priest, Travis, and a single mother, Morgan. As a result, there is an attachment to the characters and a deeper understanding of their sometimes illogical actions.

I hate to think how awful The Visitation could have been without its excellent cast. In fact, the film has something of an indie dream cast with Edward Furlong, Martin Donovan, Richard Tyson, Kelly Lynch and Priscilla Barnes. Edward Furlong is great as Brandon. In a role that could have so easily been drenched in hysterics, Edward shows restraint and turns in a genuinely creepy performance. His talent is such that he makes Brandon both abhorrent and sympathetic. Martin Donovan is as low key and convincing as ever, while Kelly Lynch only gets better with age. I can finally forgive her for "Curly Sue". Almost. It is great to see Richard Tyson and Priscilla Barnes in anything, so it's a special treat to see them act together as a somewhat demented married couple. He's possessed, she would like to be.

Robby Henson's direction is considered and the film succeeds in building a creepy atmosphere. There are some problems with the film, namely some very poor post-exorcism CG effects and an unusual lack of gore. The special effects are understandable given the film's tiny budget; less forgivable is the film's limp approach to violence. I suspect The visitation was butchered in order to get a lower rating, which is ridiculous given the nature of the material. There are several scenes, particularly one at Mrs Macon's mansion and one explaining how Brandon received his "gift", which feel incomplete and less graphic than intended. However, these gripes are pretty inconsequential in comparison to the film's many good qualities.

The Visitation is one of the highest quality straight to video horror releases in recent memory. This is the perfect example of a well made film with an excellent cast that still somehow managed to fall through the cracks. It deserved better.

Based on the excellent drama-horror book by Frank Peretti, this movie was more like a twisted, rewritten version done for film.

The story was reworked and exposition was changed, characters changed, until the master screenwriter came up with something more fitting for today's Hollywood- in other words the end results was cliché, badly cut, and dramatic in all the wrong places. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a B movie, it was better than most B movies I've seen. More like a B+ or an A-.

The editing and film style resemble a two hour long episode of CSI without the forensics- and CSI fans will notice that the cast is pretty much an entire ensemble of CSI extras.

In the end, its like they say, the book is always better. In this case the movie could have been just as good, but they decided to make it overly dramatic and hackneyed with little real character development and evolution.

Frank Peretti, I give you 2 thumbs up. Movie, you only get a tiny little knubby knuckle up.

the book is awesome, potentially life changing. the movie captures probably 1/8th of the content of the book. the book is about "doing church" and contrasting that with having a relationship with Christ. Its sharp and wise observations of people and their organizations alternately enlighten and bring tears. I've wanted my wife to read the book for a long time and watching the movie together sent the completely wrong message. so many characters and stories are missing only to focus on the weakest part: the actual supernatural activities of the false "Christ". The background stories are what make the book so powerful. I can understand that they would make the move too long and actually push the film into another genre, but I was disappointed at what was actually there.