[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroPelículas más taquillerasHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la televisión y en streamingLos 250 mejores programas de TVLos programas de TV más popularesBuscar programas de TV por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos tráileresTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

Slipstream

  • 2005
  • R
  • 1h 29min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.5/10
3.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Sean Astin in Slipstream (2005)
ActionSci-FiThriller

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA scientist goes to a bank to meet a pretty bank teller. His time machine allows him to go 10 minutes back in time and correct his approaches to her. He's shadowed by two FBI agents and the ... Leer todoA scientist goes to a bank to meet a pretty bank teller. His time machine allows him to go 10 minutes back in time and correct his approaches to her. He's shadowed by two FBI agents and the bank gets robbed.A scientist goes to a bank to meet a pretty bank teller. His time machine allows him to go 10 minutes back in time and correct his approaches to her. He's shadowed by two FBI agents and the bank gets robbed.

  • Dirección
    • David van Eyssen
  • Guionistas
    • Louis Morneau
    • Phillip Badger
  • Elenco
    • Sean Astin
    • Vinnie Jones
    • Ivana Milicevic
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    4.5/10
    3.6 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • David van Eyssen
    • Guionistas
      • Louis Morneau
      • Phillip Badger
    • Elenco
      • Sean Astin
      • Vinnie Jones
      • Ivana Milicevic
    • 87Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 14Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Fotos5

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal20

    Editar
    Sean Astin
    Sean Astin
    • Stuart
    Vinnie Jones
    Vinnie Jones
    • Briggs
    Ivana Milicevic
    Ivana Milicevic
    • Sarah
    Kevin Otto
    Kevin Otto
    • Jake
    Victoria Bartlett
    • Gillian
    Thorsten Wedekind
    • Cam
    Hakeem Kae-Kazim
    Hakeem Kae-Kazim
    • Runson
    Grant Swanby
    • Tokin
    Verity Price
    • Margaret (Bank Teller)
    Chantal Lambert
    • Sigrid (Bank Manager)
    Patrick Lyster
    Patrick Lyster
    • Hooks
    Andrew Whaley
    • Negotiator
    Sean Higgs
    Sean Higgs
    • Bus Driver
    Tamsin MacCarthy
    Tamsin MacCarthy
    • Air Stewardess
    Eve Szapira
    • Carrie (Young Mother on Airplane)
    Ben Chowney
    • Kevin (Air Marshall)
    Farouk Valley-Omar
    Farouk Valley-Omar
    • Taxi Driver
    • (as Farouk Valley Omar)
    Pierre Malherbe
    • Pilot
    • Dirección
      • David van Eyssen
    • Guionistas
      • Louis Morneau
      • Phillip Badger
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios87

    4.53.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    1atkins-m

    So bad, it's painful to watch

    I really believe a fourth grader could have written better dialog and plot. The idea for this movie creates tremendous potential which is totally wasted on sheer stupidity of conversation and illogical plot. Movies involving time travel can be tricky but if done right, can also be very thought provoking. This movie doesn't even try to go there. This movie, like so many scifi's today, is overly focused on special effects with the plot and dialog treated as an afterthought. I'll have to remember the name, David Van Eyssen, and make concerted efforts NOT to watch anything directed by him. Foolish waste of time. I really have nothing more to say about this movie but the submission filter wants more lines. So here they are.
    4ArthurDental

    narcissistic producers

    This is the kind of movie that could be decent, but becomes unwatchable because the director's so in love with his/her techniques. The plot's not groundbreaking, but it is different from most time travel movies where you keep going back in time. Unfortunately, the director likes the soundtrack and sloooooow motion so much he keeps using it over and over, resulting in something you may enjoy if you love meaningless pontification on our existence or what-not. That is, the film doesn't provide for it but David what's-his-name probably wants you to ponder and reminisce during the frequent slooow-motion rewinding of history. The premise is hard to believe already. It's a shame he decides to be clever with techniques. Over and over and over again.
    6heshootshescores

    Even with the quirkiness and errors it was interesting

    The first 10 minutes had me thinking this was one of the worst movies ever produced. As it went on it became more watchable and evolved into a quirky sort of interesting movie. There were some seemingly pointless scenes and some artsy for artsy sake bits, but the plot itself as well as some of the effects were actually pretty decent.

    As for the acting, Sean Astin was as good as Sean Astin gets, take that for what it's worth and the seemingly unknown cast was fair with only a few who were brutal actors.

    Overall, this was an interesting free watch, I might have walked away from a theater scratching my head mind you :-)
    noone-avastav

    Horribly copied by an X-Files episode (6.14)

    There's nothing more to say about this movie than the title of my review.

    I don't know how could have come in my mind to buy that DVD...

    After 15-20' it was clear it was a copy of that (fantastic!) X-Files episode (Monday - season 6 episode 14), and I'm surprised to read that no one of the other reviews has reported this...

    I was going to stop the DVD after 20-25'... Then I wanted to watch all the movie to see if there was something better...

    Useless to say, there wasn't...

    Don't watch it... In case watch the original one: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751163/

    Just to say, the movie begins after a long, boring and senseless opening title I personally jumped...
    1spammehard

    Insultingly bad....

    Where do these good reviews come from? With words and phrases like "accomplished," "mesmerizing," "visually stunning," "reminds me of the best moments from Blade runner and 2001," "Astin acts his heart out." Sounds to me like some PR people are doing damage control on the old IMDb in the hopes they can salvage some kind of life for this film on DVD. "I can't believe it wasn't theatrically released." Well, I can, and we should thank the studio execs who decided to give this movie a basic cable burial. They did so to preserve social harmony. If the general public had paid box office price to watch Slipstream, riots would have surely ensued.

    Make no mistake, people, this movie is BAD. The amazing directorial technique some seem to be so inexplicably impressed by is nothing but hack. Slow motion is used to signal the slowing down of time before a backwards trip, but it's also just used any old time to signify nothing other than the total running time needed to be longer to qualify as a feature-length film. Then there's the rotating camera. Why use the technique so much? Well they bought the rig, and darn it, they were going to use it. Stupid, horribly staged bank shootout? No worries, we've got a rotating camera. Stupid, horribly written and acted bus bathroom scene? No worries, we've got a rotating camera. And here's a dilemma, we've got two versions of a scene, one with the actors inside a car and one where they're outside, both are horribly written and acted, but we forgot to use the rotating camera. What do we do? No worries, we'll just inter-cut the two separate takes, and the lack of continuity will jar the stupider viewers into thinking that we "have a visual style." Yeah, that's right, I've been saying horribly acted. No one, in this movie is a great actor, by which I mean, has a great range. To the Astinites out there, sorry, but your boy is a serviceable actor at best. Without an extraordinary director and extraordinary writing, the mediocrity of Astin's performance is an unbearable distraction. He's had the good fortune to be in a few good movies in his career, but, left to his own devices, he will pick insipid little things like Slipstream simply because the script uses the phrase, "String Theory." This is a dangerous trait for a less-than amazing actor to possess. If he wises up, he will accept the role of supporting, character actor with grace. He cannot and should not attempt to carry a film.

    To give a little credit to the actors, including Astin, there's not much you can do with writing as terrible as this. There are no character arcs to speak of, just starting points and end points. How did they get there? What's the motivation? Who could be that stupid? Who cares! Have you seen our rotating camera? And, to all you aspiring directors, when faced with a script with no feeling and actors phoning it in, don't forget to use slow-motion. It saves the writer from having to write something compelling and the actor from having to emote. The slower you get it, the more emotional weight a scene can carry. And if you manage to have a rotating camera with slow-motion, whoa boy! Oscar can't be far behind. Or at the very least, a BAFTA.

    I've never, before watching Slipstream, felt it my duty to so harshly trash a film on the internet. I registered with IMDb because of it. Believe it or not, this is me at my most humanistic. Mankind should not have to watch this movie. If I can prevent one person, then I've done my part to make a better world.

    For the love of all that is good, go rent Donny Darko and stay far away from the abomination known as Slipstream.

    Más como esto

    Atajo a la felicidad
    5.4
    Atajo a la felicidad
    He Was a Quiet Man
    6.7
    He Was a Quiet Man
    Slipstream
    4.8
    Slipstream
    Slipstream
    4.7
    Slipstream
    Agora
    7.1
    Agora
    Slipstream
    6.8
    Slipstream
    Automatons
    4.5
    Automatons
    Repeaters
    5.7
    Repeaters
    Interkosmos
    5.7
    Interkosmos
    Pesadilla sin fin
    5.3
    Pesadilla sin fin
    Night at the Golden Eagle
    5.7
    Night at the Golden Eagle
    Puzzlehead
    5.6
    Puzzlehead

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Errores
      The action is set in the USA, but the bus in the hostage scene is right-hand drive and the door is on the left. This configuration is not used in the USA, but in South Africa where it was filmed.
    • Citas

      Stuart Conway: What happened?

      Sarah Tanner: You were dead. He shot you.

      Stuart Conway: Again? Will you please stop shooting me.

    • Conexiones
      References Butch Cassidy (1969)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes13

    • How long is Slipstream?Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 26 de agosto de 2005 (Portugal)
    • Países de origen
      • Estados Unidos
      • Sudáfrica
      • Zambia
      • Alemania
    • Sitios oficiales
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • Капкан часу
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Cape Town International Convention Centre, Cape Town, Western Cape, Sudáfrica
    • Productoras
      • Film Afrika Worldwide
      • ApolloProMedia GmbH & Co. 1. Filmproduktion KG (I)
      • ApolloProMedia GmbH & Co. 2. Filmproduktion KG
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 29 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Dolby Digital
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    Sean Astin in Slipstream (2005)
    Principales brechas de datos
    By what name was Slipstream (2005) officially released in Canada in English?
    Responda
    • Ver más datos faltantes
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.