CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.4/10
11 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Dos estafadores intentan estafar a un coleccionista de divisas vendiéndole una copia falsificada de un billete de moneda extremadamente raro.Dos estafadores intentan estafar a un coleccionista de divisas vendiéndole una copia falsificada de un billete de moneda extremadamente raro.Dos estafadores intentan estafar a un coleccionista de divisas vendiéndole una copia falsificada de un billete de moneda extremadamente raro.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Laura Cerón
- Waitress
- (as Laura Ceron)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
After sitting through the world premiere of "Criminal", I spent the whole movie trying to remember where I had seen this script before, and then the credits mention that it was adapted from the script of a great British film called "Nine Queens", which was out only a few years ago.
Except for exchanging a postage stamp for a rare currency bill, there is no originality in this adapted screenplay. Similar to the remake of "Psycho", if you are going to film a scene-for-scene remake, then why do it?
I can only hope that this movie causes people to seek out the original "Nine Queens", so that it gets the recognition it deserves in America.
It's truly sad that the first film from someone who has worked for years as an assistant director couldn't be something more innovative, original, or unique.
Except for exchanging a postage stamp for a rare currency bill, there is no originality in this adapted screenplay. Similar to the remake of "Psycho", if you are going to film a scene-for-scene remake, then why do it?
I can only hope that this movie causes people to seek out the original "Nine Queens", so that it gets the recognition it deserves in America.
It's truly sad that the first film from someone who has worked for years as an assistant director couldn't be something more innovative, original, or unique.
This first scene of this film contained more action than the rest of this rather tedious, bland remake of a recent Argentine film (which I have not seen.) There was virtually no chemistry between the two leads, Reilly and Luna. Sad sack Reilly, despite a decent performance, was miscast as the professional con man and Gyllenhaal was wasted in a minor role as Reilly's sister. Luna gave the best performance in the film as the young protégé. Scottish actor Peter Mullan played the "mark," a streetsmart "Irish" billionaire whose accent slipped from Scot to Irish every other line! By the time the surprise ending rolled around I didn't care who were the good guys, who were bad guys nor the motivations of either. The screenplay, although illogical and far-fetched, included a few good lines but I don't know if they were translated from the original film or written especially for this remake. Luckily, I saw this film at a screening and didn't have to shell out $10 for a ticket!
My vote for 9 Queens, 3 or 4 years ago: 10/10.
This one: 3/10. :-(
-
Bad remake, nothing attractive in this movie. Stupid ending (different from the original), a little boring, we don't always understand what happens...
During the whole movie, we don't feel the stress of the characters. Not because they are bad actors but the movie is not enough realistic, it's difficult to imagine their thoughts.
I totally agree those who say to watch 9 Queens instead.
Why remake it? There is nothing to change to 9 Queens, the actors are perfect and the story is great. More credible than Criminal.
This one: 3/10. :-(
-
Bad remake, nothing attractive in this movie. Stupid ending (different from the original), a little boring, we don't always understand what happens...
During the whole movie, we don't feel the stress of the characters. Not because they are bad actors but the movie is not enough realistic, it's difficult to imagine their thoughts.
I totally agree those who say to watch 9 Queens instead.
Why remake it? There is nothing to change to 9 Queens, the actors are perfect and the story is great. More credible than Criminal.
American remake of the 2000 Argentinian film "Nine Queens" features John C. Reilly in a superlative performance as a sometimes-successful Los Angeles con-man who partners with a Spanish grifter he meets one morning trying to swindle waitresses in a casino; they become involved in a scheme to dupe an Irish billionaire out of 750 Gs with a rare (and counterfeit) bill of foreign currency. Director Gregory Jacobs, who also co-wrote the script with Sam Lowry (the pen name of Steven Soderbergh), wisely allows Reilly lots of room to go into his maniacal arias, which is a good thing since little else in "Criminal" quite measures up to him (certainly not that generic title!). Although the colorful supporting cast is excellent, Reilly is the spark plug to the entire picture--a fact which makes the final curtain something of a let-down. Since this house-of-cards scenario is filled with cross and double-cross, it's difficult to fault the general plotting (it's a writer's conceit, after all); however, the impetus of this story--how it all gets set into motion--is questionable by the denouement. Still, an engrossing and enjoyable film with a high-wire acting job from Reilly, which might have received a great deal more acclaim had the overall results been stronger. **1/2 from ****
I saw the film and loved it. The ending totally threw me. As I drove home I had to rethink the entire film. Every assumptions I had while watching it was wrong. It was a total surprize. Diego is soooo naturally talented; I hope the rest of the world discover him eventually. The rest of the cast was great too. I think the critics who didn't like it were wasting their times comparing it frame for frame with the original film. It would have been nice if they reviewed the film for the millions who've never heard of the original rather than for themselves. I have never seen Nine Queens and I'm glad I didn't because I probably would have been doing the same thing and ruined the experience. I didn't have any preconceived expectations and enjoyed it immensely. Can't wait to see what Diego does next.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresThe Monroe $100 Silver Certificate isn't nearly as valuable as portrayed in the film. They were printed for two years in vast quantities beginning in 1878 and deemed immediately collectible. Hoarders have preserved most of them preventing them from earning the status of "rare", a mint condition $100 Monroe can be had for less than $2,000 and would never command the six figure price in the film. The entire scenario is a con game designed to trick Richard, so it doesn't matter if this information is factual or not, the person saying it is not a true expert on currency certificates, and Richard has no way of verifying this information anyway.
- Créditos curiososThe only opening credit is the title.
- ConexionesRemake of Nueve reinas (2000)
- Bandas sonorasSing a Simple Song
Written by Sly Stone (as Sylvester Stewart)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Criminal?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Criminal
- Locaciones de filmación
- Aon Center - 707 Wilshire Blvd., Los Ángeles, California, Estados Unidos(Location of Wells Fargo Bank branch where Richard/John C. Reilly tries to cash the check)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 929,233
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 283,209
- 12 sep 2004
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,398,053
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta