Una joven sin confianza en sí misma es maldecida con un cuerpo envejecido por una bruja odiosa. Su única oportunidad de romper el hechizo es un joven brujo en un castillo ambulante.Una joven sin confianza en sí misma es maldecida con un cuerpo envejecido por una bruja odiosa. Su única oportunidad de romper el hechizo es un joven brujo en un castillo ambulante.Una joven sin confianza en sí misma es maldecida con un cuerpo envejecido por una bruja odiosa. Su única oportunidad de romper el hechizo es un joven brujo en un castillo ambulante.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Nominado a 1 premio Óscar
- 14 premios ganados y 20 nominaciones en total
Chieko Baishô
- Sophie
- (voz)
Takuya Kimura
- Howl
- (voz)
Mitsunori Isaki
- Page
- (voz)
Yô Ôizumi
- Turnip Head
- (voz)
- …
Akio Ôtsuka
- King
- (voz)
Daijirô Harada
- Heen
- (voz)
- …
Haruko Katô
- Suliman
- (voz)
Jean Simmons
- Grandma Sophie
- (English version)
- (voz)
Christian Bale
- Howl
- (English version)
- (voz)
Lauren Bacall
- Witch of the Waste
- (English version)
- (voz)
Blythe Danner
- Madame Suliman
- (English version)
- (voz)
Emily Mortimer
- Young Sophie
- (English version)
- (voz)
Josh Hutcherson
- Markl
- (English version)
- (voz)
Billy Crystal
- Calcifer
- (English version)
- (voz)
Jena Malone
- Lettie
- (English version)
- (voz)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Howl's Moving Castle' highlights Miyazaki's signature themes of magic, strong female leads, and detailed worlds. Sophie's transformative journey and self-discovery are central. The animation is lauded for its breathtaking visuals and meticulous detail. However, some find it less original, with familiar elements and a simpler plot than Miyazaki's earlier films. Nonetheless, it is appreciated for its imaginative narrative, engaging characters, and the director's unique fusion of fantasy and reality.
Opiniones destacadas
The most beautiful anime film I have ever seen, Studio Ghibli proved to me that it is the undisputed best anime studio, the story of the film was very beautiful and the projections of the film were excellent, the characters of the film were beautifully written, especially the character of Hauru, it started narcissistic and ended completely differently, I liked the romantic relationship between Sophie and Hauru were awesome, and the film ending was so beautiful, I highly recommend watching it
A very cinematically beautiful film with characters you just fall in love with. I won't lie, the plot is very hard to follow. If you've read the book, you can tell that miyazaki focused less on following the plot, more on making the film beautiful to watch, and as a result we are left with a story that has huge chunks missing and frankly doesn't make a lot of sense in places. But I'm not mad, because it is very, very beautiful to watch.
I went to see this film with my anime and Diana Wynne Jones-loving teenage daughter. And while I enjoyed the film immensely due to its excellent animation, story and overall sense of fun, it was also interesting to see how much my daughter hated it! It was as if we saw two entirely different films. Why? Well, she is a huge Diana Wynne Jones fan and has read and re-read just about everything she ever wrote. And, according to her, the story was so different and so inferior to the book that she disliked the film and said some very nasty things about director Miyazaki. However, my advice is DON'T read the book and just go and see the movie. Then, after enjoying it, read the book ONLY if you are 100% sure you can do this without freaking out because they are so different!! I didn't know the difference and had a great time seeing the film!
It's hard to make any movie that follow after 'Spirited Away' So, when you watch, you have to try and keep an open mind....which is hard to do since the characters, and the whole feel of the film seems so much like his previous works.
But what fun this film is! And interestingly beautiful. I could watch most any of his movies, just to look at the beautiful scenery. I love some of the incredible imagination that goes into his works.
I could easily recommend this film. No, it's not the better than the rest, but I feel it's definitely worth your time.
I look forward to seeing the film again, maybe I will understand some things a bit better.
But what fun this film is! And interestingly beautiful. I could watch most any of his movies, just to look at the beautiful scenery. I love some of the incredible imagination that goes into his works.
I could easily recommend this film. No, it's not the better than the rest, but I feel it's definitely worth your time.
I look forward to seeing the film again, maybe I will understand some things a bit better.
When I read some four years ago that Diana Wynne Jones had sold the rights for Howl's Moving Castle to a Japanese animator, I wondered. The book (one of my very favorites, which I re-read at least once a year) takes several fairy-tale conventions and merrily turns them upside down. Ms Jones refuses to allow her imagination be neatly pigeonholed as hard sci-fi or straight fantasy, juvenile or adult. This story (as all of her stories) revels in word play. I really wondered how it would all come out translated into Japanese.
I'd never heard of Miyazaki. Then I saw Spirited Away, Princess Mononoke, The Cat Returns, and Kiki's Delivery Service. Wow. I think Ms Jones and Mr. Miyazaki must be kindred souls. His movies share a lot with her novels a whimsical sense of humor, impossible to pigeonhole into a category, magic and mischief, and a firm respect for the audience's intelligence. I began to pace the floor in anticipation of the movie.
I saw the movie today. I was not disappointed. The soul of the story is intact, Sophie and Howl and Calcifer are nearly as I imagined them. Yes, there are some plot adjustments. Think of it as the Series 12C version (for those who have read Ms Jones' Chrestomanci books.) The main elements are there, some re-arranged, some changed, yet with a full understanding of the original. Much like the 2004 version of Peter Pan much was changed, but the soul is the same.
For those who wonder, here are the differences between the movie and the novel. I've tried to phrase them carefully to avoid spoilers for either fans of Ms Jones's work who have yet to see the movie, and those who have seen the movie and have yet to read the book:
Why the witch bespells Sophie
Where the door opens when the dial points to black
Sophie's sister Martha, and the plot line involving sister Lettie are not in the movie Mrs. Pentstemmon, Miss Angorian, Mrs. Fairfax are also missing, but elements of each are woven into other characters in the movie Michael (Markl) is a different age The battles magical and military are quite different (but equally spectacular) The dog appears at a different time, with a different, yet just as mysterious, agenda The scarecrow's relationship with Sophie is different Thelevel of technology is different. (I did miss the 7-league boots)
My advice: go see the movie. It's magical and beautiful and funny. Then, if you are a Diana Wynne Jones fan, check out the rest of Miyazaki's films. Now is a great time, as many of his films are available on home DVD. If you are a Miyazaki fan, hie thee to a library or bookstore try Ms Jones' books. (There is a sequel to Howl's Moving Castle Castle in the Air.)
And enjoy!
I'd never heard of Miyazaki. Then I saw Spirited Away, Princess Mononoke, The Cat Returns, and Kiki's Delivery Service. Wow. I think Ms Jones and Mr. Miyazaki must be kindred souls. His movies share a lot with her novels a whimsical sense of humor, impossible to pigeonhole into a category, magic and mischief, and a firm respect for the audience's intelligence. I began to pace the floor in anticipation of the movie.
I saw the movie today. I was not disappointed. The soul of the story is intact, Sophie and Howl and Calcifer are nearly as I imagined them. Yes, there are some plot adjustments. Think of it as the Series 12C version (for those who have read Ms Jones' Chrestomanci books.) The main elements are there, some re-arranged, some changed, yet with a full understanding of the original. Much like the 2004 version of Peter Pan much was changed, but the soul is the same.
For those who wonder, here are the differences between the movie and the novel. I've tried to phrase them carefully to avoid spoilers for either fans of Ms Jones's work who have yet to see the movie, and those who have seen the movie and have yet to read the book:
Why the witch bespells Sophie
Where the door opens when the dial points to black
Sophie's sister Martha, and the plot line involving sister Lettie are not in the movie Mrs. Pentstemmon, Miss Angorian, Mrs. Fairfax are also missing, but elements of each are woven into other characters in the movie Michael (Markl) is a different age The battles magical and military are quite different (but equally spectacular) The dog appears at a different time, with a different, yet just as mysterious, agenda The scarecrow's relationship with Sophie is different Thelevel of technology is different. (I did miss the 7-league boots)
My advice: go see the movie. It's magical and beautiful and funny. Then, if you are a Diana Wynne Jones fan, check out the rest of Miyazaki's films. Now is a great time, as many of his films are available on home DVD. If you are a Miyazaki fan, hie thee to a library or bookstore try Ms Jones' books. (There is a sequel to Howl's Moving Castle Castle in the Air.)
And enjoy!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaUpon seeing El viaje de Chihiro (2001), Christian Bale immediately agreed to play any role in this film. He didn't expect to get the titular role.
- ErroresSophie's top ribbon doesn't always reappear when she transforms back into her younger self.
- Citas
Howl: I feel terrible, like there's a weight on my chest.
Young Sophie: A heart's a heavy burden.
- ConexionesEdited into Miyazaki Dreams of Flying (2017)
- Bandas sonorasSekai no Yakusoku
(Promise of the World)
Lyrics by Shuntarô Tanikawa
Music by Yumi Kimura
Arranged by Joe Hisaishi
Performed by Chieko Baishô
Courtesy of Tokuma Japan Communications
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Howl's Moving Castle
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 24,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 9,173,958
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 427,987
- 12 jun 2005
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 241,282,539
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 59min(119 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta