Embrace the Darkness 3

In this, the final part of the Embrace the Darkness trilogy, Jennifer is now played by Chelsea Blue, although in the credits she is Brooke Larele. Using Renee Rea again would have given the last two films a welcome consistency although it has to be said that Ms Larele does exude the growing stature and power of Jennifer compared to the novice vampire Jennifer in the second film and the soon-to-be vampire Jennifer (Madison Clark) of the first.

In the opening of this film we find Jennifer and Jack (Tristen Couer D'Alene, but credited as Tristen Edwards) hiding out in a run-down hotel where they exist by stealing blood bank samples. Jennifer finds that she can manage very well without Jack but on one of her nightly forays she is spotted by powerful businessman, Victor Chamberlain (Ty Winston) who senses that she has a power like no other vampire. She learns that Victor and his retinue are also vampires and slowly she is drawn into Victor's world, not realising that he has an ulterior motive for wanting her. They are drawn to each other but time is running out for Jennifer unless she discovers Victor's motives, and for Victor who needs her for his nefarious plans.

This film, like the first is more character-driven, unlike the second which is more for the sex and nudity brigade. Ty Winston really shines as the evil and duplicitous Victor Chamberlain and Brooke Larele gives a good performance as the vampire who is becoming more confident in her new existence. One weakness is Sean, (Glen Meadows) a newspaper reporter who, on this performance would never make it as a paparazzo. There are varied sex scenes throughout the film so there is no lacking on that score. An award of 5 stars seems reasonable.

This is a great end for a softporn trilogy of vampires.

In the first one sweet Jennifer turned into a vampire. In the seccond now as a vampire Jennifer rise. And to conclude we discouver that our heroine could end as the bloody thirsty Queen of vampires, or Return into human again.

So Jennifer should choose between the love of a powerful vampire or a human reporter (Glenn Meadows).

In the first 2 films the main villain are women. In this end are Men and Jennifer herself are jerks, who has no doubt to kill her only vampire friend in the first 10 minutes. The only trully kind character as long with an elderly librarian.

The sex scenes are few and our last Jennifer actress (Chelsea Blue, the seccond pornographic actress for the heroine) isnt good enough, as isnt good enough the main vampire. BLUE Had luck of charisma and her sex scenes are bleh!

. Fortunately most of secundary cast is great, and is a pitty that Mia Zattoli hasnt the main rol (she has only a brief sex scene and short amount of time). The reporters has lot chemestry together, and not only had the best sex scene, but also they trully deliver good performanceand character development In no sex parts.

The end a kind of predicaba but its ok for ending this trilogy.

This movie is basically the story of a sexy female vampire named Jennifer, who discovers she is one of the few "pure vampires" who has incredible vampire

strength, is unaffected by sunlight, and has great sexual powers. So Jennifer often has sex with her victims which are either young men or young women and

then she bites them! Jennifer claims that she's only been a vampire for a year, so she is only starting to learn the secrets about her dark gift, and that other vampires will kill her for her "pure vampire" powers.

Jennifer is certainly the most seductive vampire I have yet seen, but I'll admit this film does have a bit too much sex scene. This film doesn't have the fascinating aspects about vampires as seen in 'Interview With The Vampire' nor exciting

action scenes that were seen in 'Underworld'. You should see this film if you'd like to see a seductive female vampire, but I'd stick to the well known films about vampires that appear in cinemas.

I don't think you have to watch the Embrace the Darkness trilogy (especially if you're a fan of Twilight), but when I start something, I do like to finish or conclude that thing. In this case it was the soft-core trilogy that has an ongoing story development throughout the series. I'm not sure this was intended as a trilogy from the get-go (and I didn't bother to look up what this was based on), but it ended up as one that's for sure.

The acting is OK I guess for a movie that relies more on nudity and pretend intercourse. The second movie was the best story wise (for me), though I'm not sure you would want to watch it for that or the erotic scenes that are in there. I did fast forward them, to get to the story, which wasn't as pleasing as it should be (then again, I might have gotten that wrong).