[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

The Foreigner

  • 2003
  • R
  • 1h 35min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
3.4/10
7.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Steven Seagal and Anna-Louise Plowman in The Foreigner (2003)
AcciónAcción de ejército de una personaThriller

Un agente independiente debe transportar un paquete para un misterioso empleador, lo que lo lleva a una red de traiciones y engaños.Un agente independiente debe transportar un paquete para un misterioso empleador, lo que lo lleva a una red de traiciones y engaños.Un agente independiente debe transportar un paquete para un misterioso empleador, lo que lo lleva a una red de traiciones y engaños.

  • Dirección
    • Michael Oblowitz
  • Guionista
    • Darren Campbell
  • Elenco
    • Steven Seagal
    • Harry Van Gorkum
    • Max Ryan
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    3.4/10
    7.6 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Michael Oblowitz
    • Guionista
      • Darren Campbell
    • Elenco
      • Steven Seagal
      • Harry Van Gorkum
      • Max Ryan
    • 120Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 18Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    The Foreigner (2003)
    Trailer 2:11
    The Foreigner (2003)

    Fotos27

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 21
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal37

    Editar
    Steven Seagal
    Steven Seagal
    • Jonathan Cold
    Harry Van Gorkum
    Harry Van Gorkum
    • Jerome Van Aken
    Max Ryan
    Max Ryan
    • Dunoir
    Jeffrey Pierce
    Jeffrey Pierce
    • Sean Cold
    Anna-Louise Plowman
    Anna-Louise Plowman
    • Meredith Van Aken
    Sherman Augustus
    Sherman Augustus
    • Mr. Mimms
    Gary Raymond
    Gary Raymond
    • Jared Olyphant
    Philip Dunbar
    • Alexander Marquee
    Izabela Okrasa
    • Clarissa Van Aken
    Grzegorz Kowalczyk
    Grzegorz Kowalczyk
    • Rolls Royce Driver
    Dianna Camacho
    Dianna Camacho
    • Hotel Clerk Imke
    Deobia Oparei
    Deobia Oparei
    • The Stranger
    Grzegorz Emanuel
    Grzegorz Emanuel
    • Jonathan Look Alike
    Przemyslaw Saleta
    Przemyslaw Saleta
    • Security Guard
    Jan Jurewicz
    Jan Jurewicz
    • Man with Porsche
    Victoria Smirnova
    • Claret
    John Edmondson
    • Young Man at Railway Station
    Grzegorz Mostowicz-Gerszt
    • Assailant
    • (as Grzegorz Mostowicz)
    • Dirección
      • Michael Oblowitz
    • Guionista
      • Darren Campbell
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios120

    3.47.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    bob the moo

    The plot is terrible, which means the film relies heavily on the action which is, sadly, just as terrible

    Jonathan Cold is a freelance agent who is hired by Alexander Marques to carry a package across Europe to Jerome Van Aiken. When the simple collection turns into a gunfire that ends with the building in flames, Cold suspects something is up but, after a diversion to his father's funeral, continues to try and deliver the package. However as the hours pass, Cold finds that more and more people seem to want either a) the package, b) Cold stone cold dead or c) both of the above. Unsure of who these people are or why they want the package (or even what the package is because, despite everyone in the world betraying him, he is too "professional" to look inside) Cold tries to sort out right from wrong and make it out alive.

    Call me a stubborn man but although Out For A Kill was a shambles, I still somehow thought that I would give this joint Oblowitz/Seagal film a shot. Very quickly it becomes apparent that the plot isn't going to stand up for longer than 20 minutes – which is a problem in a 90 minute film. Taking the usual cliché of an agent being chased by all sides, trying to find a solution, this film forgets to actually write it in such a way that it makes sense or even engages. People pop up all over the place, are thrown out of windows and generally interact with bullets or explosions in one way or another but we don't really know who they are or why they are doing it. In one sense this might have worked by producing a general sense of claustrophobia and tension but it doesn't – instead it gives the impression that the writers haven't done much with the story other than drawing up a storyboard where lots of people fall through windows. This lack of effort in the writing is not only at this level but also runs all through the film – for example on man behind shot twice by a shotgun (at 10 foot range), falling out a second storey window but turning up alive minutes later with an injury to his side but generally fine otherwise.

    With these problems it will be no surprise to find that the characters are poor. Most of them are just cardboard clichés but Cold is the main problem. Here is someone we are meant to like, who is a professional, however he managed to be completely lacking in morals and is closer to the baddies than I'm sure Seagal would have liked. For example he pays some "normal" guy to deliver his car to Germany, thus drawing the bad guys away from him – problem is, the normal guy was always going to get killed – is this a plan that is meant to make me like him or care if Cold lives or dies? Maybe this was the point but, if it was, it didn't work because Seagal delivers it just the same as ever – loads of mumbles and slightly altering his tone of voice when required to display any emotion. Ryan is a little bit more expressive (and thus fun) but he seems to spend most of his time running away from explosions or reappearing from the dead. The rest of the support is bland, being made up of obscure sports stars turned actors and lots of people trying to look classy without the material to allow them to do it. Suffice to say that, when none of the cast even manage to outshine Seagal then you know things aren't good.

    Overall a poor Seagal film that even fans will struggle to get into. The action is poor and is directed with no flow (or edit longer than a second) and it is too hard to get excited about it. This leaves the story, which is a sorry mess of a plot that makes no effort to engage or make sense of; basically it just relies on people falling through glass and those looking for a complex thriller and not just wasting their time – they are deluding themselves. Even Seagal fans (if any remain) will struggle to care about this garbage.
    Li-1

    Seagal continues to reach new lows.

    1/2 out of ****

    The most painfully boring action movie I've seen since (insert any recent Steven Seagal venture), I'm starting to wonder if satiating my morbid curiosity over the next Seagal disaster is worth wasting time for the hell I endure. To date, I have not genuinely enjoyed any of the man's movies (well, not entirely true, Executive Decision was excellent, but not Seagal's movie, thankfully) and it's almost always because of him. With a few exceptions, I can easily picture different stars in his past roles that would have made these subpar action pictures superior to...well, how they turned out with Mr. Expressionless himself.

    Such is the case with The Foreigner, which stars Steven Seagal as Jonathon Cold, a mysterious guy who delivers packages. Gasp, it's like The Transporter, only without the hugely charismatic lead and thrilling action sequences. I'd delve further into The Foreigner's plot, if only I understood what the hell was going on. The basic premise is that Cold's latest package is something everyone wants to get their hands on and they'll kill him for it.

    But not a single plot point is the slightest bit comprehensible. Supporting characters appear at random, looking for the package, rarely ever establishing a clear reason why the want or need it. Excruciating monologue upon excruciating monologue is inserted into the script to no avail; I wonder if the actors involved even understood what they were saying or doing. The movie's silly, too, with Seagal's character acting in ways that might seem clever to a five-year old (switch cars with someone else, give bad guy a fake package), which apparently means most of these bad guys aren't much smarter than your average kindergartener.

    After Exit Wounds, The Foreigner became (mostly) a return to typical Seagal. Like his previous early works, the title could be used to describe Seagal's character (i.e. Steven Seagal is...Out for Justice, Marked for Death, Above the Law, Hard to Kill), the fight scenes are almost as short as those in The Patriot, and the lead villain is pathetically easy to defeat in hand-to-hand combat. In an attempt to give the movie style, director Michael Oblowitz applies slow motion to the shootouts, sometimes also speeding up the footage. How exactly he thinks this could do anything for the movie (especially for action scenes as short as these) is baffling.

    As usual, Seagal is wooden as ever, proving himself the worst actor ever to have been considered a star. He's also getting chubbier, usually hiding his weight gain with abnormally large coats. If someone else, say Jason Statham, had this role instead, the movie's quality would easily jump up a *, as plot incomprehensibility could still be made somewhat bearable with a charismatic lead (which Statham amply provides).

    I read somewhere The Foreigner is originally slated for a theatrical release, but after Half Past Dead bombed, the studio dumped this into the video market almost immediately. So the movie should be very availabe at your nearest rental store, but I suggest you ignore it, even if you are a Seagal fan, and check The Transporter out instead, just to see why Jason Statham will be cinema's next big action star and how a movie about a guy who delivers packages can be made with style.
    3sveknu

    OK.....what happened here?

    When you watch a Seagal movie, you expect good action. You expect fighting, not just a lot of shooting like in this flick. And: you expect a rather simple story. OK, I can live with a more complex story even though it's a Seagal movie. But this one, this is, I don't know what to say. It's very, very confusing indeed. At the end of the movie, I had major problems figuring out what had happened. And I know I'm not the only one. The story lacks so much information and is so full of plot holes that it's nearly impossible to keep track of what's happening in the movie. There are many people in the movie, people change sides all the time, and it switches locations too often. Terrible. I just don't understand why it looks like Seagal is making a sort of sequel to this one.
    calleydog

    The solution is...shoot!

    The movie fascinated me because of the plot, but once it got underway my fascination took a different direction. I think for the only time in my life I laughed at people getting shot. Segall's Dutch accomplice shoots everyone! He himself is shot four different times. The hotel clerk won't give out a room number? Ask her to call and see which number she dials. Then, instead of unobtrusively going to that room, shoot her!

    The farce is complete when Segall faces down an opponent holding a gun 20 yards away. He flings a flight recorder CD with a little C4 stuck on like gum at his assailant. We see the disk igniting in mid-air in slow motion. Does the other guy shoot? No, he just stares at a CD coming to blow him away. The CD has the extra fun effect of propelling him backwards and upwards through a conveniently placed 2nd story picture window.

    I must admit; I enjoyed this so much that I immediately went out to get another Segall movie to see if it is as ridiculous. I can't explain why this is entertaining, but it is! IT IS!!
    soundsgood1

    21/2 Stars. Very polished production, good action film.

    This is one of those films that makes me wonder about the integrity of a lot of film reviewers. In this very same forum, you will find a guy who talks about all of the Steven Seagal films he has seen that he didn't like. Then why watch his movies? It's as if every action film is supposed to live up to the Godfather movies or something. I just don't get it. This film was a pleasure to see. A very polished and professional production. The movie has some interesting plot twists that no doubt can get the lazy of mind in a twist, waiting for the pieces to come together. But like all good directors, Michael Oblowitz makes you wait to the END of the film to find out the answers. As opposed to the BEGINNING of the film like some of the savant reviewers seem to think it should be. In my opinion Steven Seagal is one of the few action movie people who actually made significant improvement in acting skills as their careers developed. You want to see exceptional acting? Watch Steven in the scene from Glimmer Man, when as Jack Cole he tells his wife that he is going to have to tell his kids that their mother is dead. If you can watch that scene and honestly say that you think he can't act, then maybe you should stick to the Oscars. And even then, just about every actor that has won an Oscar has had their share of stinkers. Seagal makes great action films. Certainly better than most of the Chuck Norris films, most of the Stalone films, and most of the Schwarzenegger films (his comedy is good but Arnolds action acting on his best day isn't as good as Seagals).

    Más como esto

    Rastro sangriento
    3.4
    Rastro sangriento
    Shadow Man
    4.0
    Shadow Man
    The Patriot
    4.2
    The Patriot
    Black Dawn
    3.8
    Black Dawn
    Out of Reach
    4.0
    Out of Reach
    Pistol Whipped
    5.0
    Pistol Whipped
    Belly of the Beast
    4.6
    Belly of the Beast
    Tiempo límite
    3.5
    Tiempo límite
    Into the Sun
    4.3
    Into the Sun
    Medio muerto
    4.6
    Medio muerto
    Flight of Fury
    3.4
    Flight of Fury
    Mercenary for Justice
    4.0
    Mercenary for Justice

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      The opening scene with the soldiers is an actual "change of duty" at the "Grave of an Unnamed Soldier" in Warsaw, Poland - a symbolic tribute to all those killed in the Second World War.
    • Errores
      In the scene where the characters exit the burning farmhouse, Steven Segal's stand-in is clearly visible.
    • Citas

      Mimms: Sweet dreams Bruce Lee.

    • Conexiones
      Edited into Black Dawn (2005)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes16

    • How long is The Foreigner?Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 20 de junio de 2003 (Corea del Sur)
    • Países de origen
      • Estados Unidos
      • Polonia
    • Idiomas
      • Inglés
      • Danés
      • Alemán
      • Polaco
    • También se conoce como
      • 致命任務
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Kazun, Mazowieckie, Polonia
    • Productoras
      • Franchise Pictures
      • Foreigner Productions Inc.
      • TriStar Pictures
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • USD 16,700,000 (estimado)
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 1h 35min(95 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.