The President's Man: A Line in the Sand

I started watching this - not knowing what to expect - but - hoping that it would be in the same vein as Lone Wolf McQuade. I was wrong. For those folks who see this as an action adventure - I would be more satisfied watching Wide World of Wrestling. Chuck Norris is in the movie - but - his presence is minimal. Watchable - perhaps - but - barely. Made for TV movie - to fill a time slot. Oh well - I'll just dig through my stacks of DVDs - and - dig out the earlier Chuck Norris movies - which were - of a much better quality in terms of plot - dialogue and action. I understand that Lone Wolf McQuade was made in 1983 - when Chuck Norris was forty-three years old - and - The President's Man was made in 2002 - twenty years later - when he was in his sixties - but - although the basic idea was sound - (someone ready to retire and who is looking for a replacement) - the execution was poor.

Oh dear, Oh dear. I started watching this not knowing what to expect. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. There were times when I thought it was a comedy. I loved how the government's plan to capture the terrorist leader is to air drop in one man, who is unarmed, and expect him to capture him and escape with a rocket pack. If only it were really that easy. I've finally found a movie worse than "Plan 9 From Outer Space".

Too bad Chuck Norris has gone to TV. He made some good movies before he hit TV. This is a typical TV movie intended to pass the time. Unfortunately it wastes Chuck's talent as an actor. I hope he returns to the big screen some day.

Deke Slater is the new President's Man. He's working with his mentor Josh McCord (Chuck Norris) and Que on missions around the globe. President Adam Mayfield (Robert Urich) has a new mission for the secret group. An Arab terrorist group had smuggled a nuclear bomb into the U. S.

This was filmed before 9/11 and was aired months after the event. The recounting of the terrorist attacks is both powerful and out-of-date. It's not that they could do anything about it. In a way, it's too on-the-nose and also wrong-headed. I don't think anybody wants a fictional fight against Islamic terrorists when there is a real one on the nightly news. As for the movie itself, the story holds together better than the first one. It's still stuck strictly in B-TV territories. It's not good enough to be realistic and it's definitively not trying to be stylish. It's Chuck's 80's work over and over again.

Having just watched the 2000 movie "The President's Man", then I ventured on to watching the 2002 sequel "The President's Man: A Line in the Sand", which I didn't know existed before now in 2025.

Writers Bob Gookin, John Lansing and Bruce Cervi put together an okay script and storyline, though I have to say that it felt short of being as enjoyable as the 2000 movie. But it was still a fair enough script and a watchable movie. I struggled a bit with feigning interest in the narrative, as the were long patched of nothing happening in the narrative.

It was nice that both Chuck Norris and Jennifer Tung returned to reprise their roles. The only familiar face on the screen, aside from the aforementioned two, was actor Robert Urich. The acting performances in the movie were fair, no doubt about that.

There is some action in the movie that helped keep the movie afloat. But just not enough to lift the movie up to par with its predecessor.

My rating of director Eric Norris's 2002 movie "The President's Man: A Line in the Sand" lands on four out of ten stars.