[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

La sonrisa de Mona Lisa

Título original: Mona Lisa Smile
  • 2003
  • B
  • 1h 57min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
96 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
POPULARIDAD
4,072
621
La sonrisa de Mona Lisa (2003)
Trailer for Mona Lisa Smile
Reproducir trailer2:32
9 videos
78 fotos
DramaDrama laboralLa mayoría de edad

Un profesor de arte de libre pensamiento enseña a las conservadoras niñas Wellesley de los años 50 a cuestionar sus roles sociales tradicionales.Un profesor de arte de libre pensamiento enseña a las conservadoras niñas Wellesley de los años 50 a cuestionar sus roles sociales tradicionales.Un profesor de arte de libre pensamiento enseña a las conservadoras niñas Wellesley de los años 50 a cuestionar sus roles sociales tradicionales.

  • Dirección
    • Mike Newell
  • Guionistas
    • Lawrence Konner
    • Mark Rosenthal
  • Elenco
    • Julia Roberts
    • Kirsten Dunst
    • Julia Stiles
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    6.6/10
    96 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    POPULARIDAD
    4,072
    621
    • Dirección
      • Mike Newell
    • Guionistas
      • Lawrence Konner
      • Mark Rosenthal
    • Elenco
      • Julia Roberts
      • Kirsten Dunst
      • Julia Stiles
    • 317Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 93Opiniones de los críticos
    • 45Metascore
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 6 nominaciones en total

    Videos9

    Mona Lisa Smile
    Trailer 2:32
    Mona Lisa Smile
    Mona Lisa Smile
    Trailer 2:30
    Mona Lisa Smile
    Mona Lisa Smile
    Trailer 2:30
    Mona Lisa Smile
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: I'm Educating You
    Clip 1:17
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: I'm Educating You
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: You're Not Required To Like It
    Clip 1:17
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: You're Not Required To Like It
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: Do I Look Like Her?
    Clip 0:55
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: Do I Look Like Her?
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: Ladies Choice
    Clip 1:00
    Mona Lisa Smile Scene: Ladies Choice

    Fotos78

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 71
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal99+

    Editar
    Julia Roberts
    Julia Roberts
    • Katherine Ann Watson
    Kirsten Dunst
    Kirsten Dunst
    • Betty Warren
    Julia Stiles
    Julia Stiles
    • Joan Brandwyn
    Maggie Gyllenhaal
    Maggie Gyllenhaal
    • Giselle Levy
    Ginnifer Goodwin
    Ginnifer Goodwin
    • Connie Baker
    Dominic West
    Dominic West
    • Bill Dunbar
    Juliet Stevenson
    Juliet Stevenson
    • Amanda Armstrong
    Marcia Gay Harden
    Marcia Gay Harden
    • Nancy Abbey
    John Slattery
    John Slattery
    • Paul Moore
    Marian Seldes
    Marian Seldes
    • President Jocelyn Carr
    Donna Mitchell
    Donna Mitchell
    • Mrs. Warren
    Terence Rigby
    Terence Rigby
    • Dr. Edward Staunton
    Jennie Eisenhower
    Jennie Eisenhower
    • Girl at the Station
    Leslie Lyles
    • Housing Director
    Laura Allen
    Laura Allen
    • Susan Delacorte
    Topher Grace
    Topher Grace
    • Tommy Donegal
    Lily Lodge
    • House Matron
    Jordan Bridges
    Jordan Bridges
    • Spencer Jones
    • Dirección
      • Mike Newell
    • Guionistas
      • Lawrence Konner
      • Mark Rosenthal
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios317

    6.696.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    TxMike

    A well-made Wellesley College period piece.

    I liked Julia Roberts less in her earlier movies, I like her more now that she is playing older and flawed characters, like the new professor of Art History in 1953 Wellesley College in "Mona Lisa Smile." And the title does not refer to her, instead it is embedded in remarks in the screenplay about the actual painting of The Mona Lisa. Not everything turns out well in this movie, it more closely reflects real life than do many of the modern romantic comedies. This one is NOT a romantic comedy, although it does include several romances, and there are some funny parts. It is more a serious drama about life and growing up, both from the perspectives of the undergraduates, and the new professor. I bought the DVD, the picture and sound are fine, and there are several interesting extras on the making of this movie, and the work done to get the period correct.

    I don't share the many negative comments about this movie. It is a fine drama, one that merits repeat viewings once or twice a year. It is NOT simply a 'Dead Poet's Society' for the girls. To call it that is to overlook all the fine, unique points about this movie.

    Update: Saw it again March 2013, I enjoyed it as much as the first two times.

    Update: Saw it again June 2017, I enjoyed it as much as the first three times.
    tonstant viewer

    This Picture Is Better Than It Should Be

    This is the kind of movie that is easy to pan, but deserves better. Yes, the premise is familiar, the plot is formulaic, the characters seem like you've met them before.

    But...

    "The devil is in the details," as they say, and this picture has just enough surprises, just enough charm, just enough fine acting to make it worth watching. Movies do not have to be real to be worthwhile, they just have to be about real things. The questions "Mona Lisa Smile" covers are still very much with us, and may provoke considerable discussion in your house. This film is respectful enough of its subject matter and well-enough executed to make it a much better way to spend your time than most of what's out there now. Don't believe the sourpusses, this one's a good'un.
    7rulistenin14-1

    Meaningful

    I attended a women's college and found that even though this movie takes place in the early 50's, I could relate to it. Women are still struggling with finding their place in society and this movie speaks to all generations, not just those of the 1950s. The relationships that the students had not only with each other but also with their teachers were portrayed very realistically. This movie is not without flaws though, I didn't particularly like Kristin Dunst, but that is because I believe she overacts in many of her movies, but I was very moved by Julia Stiles, Maggie Gyllenhaal and especially Ginnifer Goodwin. Worth watching.
    8zetes

    Much better than I expected

    Another film about a progressive teacher trying to teach her students how to think outside of the box. Fortunately, unlike School of Rock, my views on which were accosted last week, I left Mona Lisa Smile mostly satisfied with what I had seen. No, it's not especially revelatory or surprising. You can more or less guess what's going to happen to each character by the end. But it does leave a little more room for characterization, for slightly unexpected outcomes, and it doesn't telegraph its moments quite so rigidly as the Linklater film. Julia Roberts is an actress about whom I feel nothing; I neither like nor dislike her. I think this is one of her better performances, certainly much better than her Oscar winning role in Erin Brockovich. She plays the progressive art history teacher, who arrives at Welsley to learn that all of her students have already studied the textbook from cover to cover, and can answer any question that might arise from the class's current syllabus. The curriculum and Roberts' superiors are strict in what they want to teach about art, but Roberts veers towards teaching what the textbook will not despite them. The superiors are unhappy with her course, but some of the students are opened up to the experience. Outside of class, Roberts faces as large a challenge. Most of her students have completely resigned to the idea that they are destined for marriage and nothing more. The status quo must be challenged. The students are a nice range of characters. Kirsten Dunst plays the most conservative, who is about to be married when the film opens. She, of course, rejects Roberts' ideals. On the other end of the spectrum is Maggie Gyllenhaal, who is the sexually promiscuous girl who idealizes her teacher. Slightly left of center is Ginnifer Goodwin and right of center Julia Stiles. These four characters are set up very mechanically, of course, but the characters succeed (and this can be said about all of the other characters of the movie, including Roberts', who are all rather mechanical) on the quality of acting. Each of the performers are wonderful. They manage to make you care, which is something that didn't happen with School of Rock, whose performers (with the one exception of Joan Cusack) were adequate or worse. I especially loved Marcia Gay Harden, giving another one of the best performances of 2003, as Roberts' roommate, who teaches etiquette. She's a pathetic, tragicomic image of what some of the girls will become if they insist that the traditional concept of womanhood remain unchanged. The film also boasts exceptional technical qualities. It's simply very well made. 8/10.
    8pancakes27

    Either you're gonna love it or you won't.

    I just watched this movie in the theatres as it was released just a few days ago overhere. What can you expect from it? You've seen the trailers... It looks pretty much like Dead Poet's Society doesn't it? But with women instead? :-D.

    Well, I had that feeling indeed. It felt like Dead Poet's Society during some periods in the movie. But overall, it was still different. The surface story isn't that complicated and easy to follow. It's nothing new either. But it was displayed very well.

    Sure, it's about a teacher... her passion to teach and the way she outwitted the students to get the best out of them... It also shows the way a good teacher cares for their students and so forth... and the way contradicting ideas may blind one's ideas and actions, towards those who they are meant for. Did that sentence sound weird or what? :).

    You can't go wrong with the cast here. You've got Julia Roberts, Kirsten Dunst, Julia Stiles, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Ginnefer Goodwin, etc. They played great in the movie.

    Julia Roberts is just great at playing these emotional roles. It was believable as well. I at least could feel the frustration which she had. Her character is more of a confused type. She reminded me of Michelle Pfeiffer in Dangerous Minds... There was basically a mixture of confusion and dedication... thus as a teacher, despite how sure of she may be of her teaching methods, you also sense a nervousness in her... a feeling of uncertainty as to whether her methods of getting the messages across to the students or not will work. I thought Julia Roberts did a great job in that area.

    Kirsten was just excellent. You could feel the internal turmoil going through her throughout the movie. One might argue that she had a pretty wack role and that she overacted etc. but I don't agree with that. She's practically a heartless b**** through the movie, but you can't help but understand why. The same goes for Julia and Maggie. Just the way they were depicted in the movie, you really felt for them. Ginnefer Goodwin's character was also funny and emotional to watch.

    Marcia Gay Harden, as Julia's friend was great. She was a pretty funny character to watch, but at the same time, you just can't help but feel sorry for her.

    Times have changed... from those times and now. Many might watch this movie and go, "Uhm, okay, what's the big deal?" But the problem is that women have gone through a great ordeal and struggle to get to where they are today in society. Even today, they still fight to gain respect in many areas in the world today.

    I've heard many bad comments about this movie. And funnily enough, most of them come from guys... whilst the females found it a bit better. There were some negative comments but many said that they loved it, but felt that it wasn't a movie for everyone.

    The movie tackling the issue of feminism only touches upon a small part of it all of course. One cannot tackle the whole aspect of feminism in any one single movie at all, and I found the focus to be good enough. There are many stereotypes here and I found them necessary to get the points across. If it were not for the stereotypes, people would be wondering what the point really was. But now that there are stereotypes, people will complain about them.

    I thought that it was a bit too short. It could have focused a bit more on the other characters in the movie... i.e. the girls in school. A few more subplots and build ups may have been better. There was a little foreshadowing in the movie but one couldn't help but wonder where the movie was going. But what overcame this, from my point of view, was that you just felt that you wanted to get to know the characters in the movie more. The more you knew about each character, the more the characters knew about one another. I thought that was quite nice.

    I would advise everyone with an open mind for dramas to go watch this movie. If guys see this movie as a "chick flick"... they really won't know what to expect cause this would be "the most THE chick flick for chicks" if you get my drift. I'm a guy and I found it entertaining... Whether it was insightful or not, I wouldn't say it was, due to experiences and stories throughout my life.

    The movie isn't without flaws... There could have been even more character build up if only the director's were given more film to record the picture. But do watch this if you can :). It'll be worth the time, if you're patient enough :).

    Más como esto

    Quédate a mi lado
    6.8
    Quédate a mi lado
    Erin Brockovich, una mujer audaz
    7.5
    Erin Brockovich, una mujer audaz
    Comer, rezar, amar
    5.9
    Comer, rezar, amar
    Novia fugitiva
    5.6
    Novia fugitiva
    La boda de mi mejor amigo
    6.4
    La boda de mi mejor amigo
    Mujer bonita
    7.1
    Mujer bonita
    Julie & Julia
    7.0
    Julie & Julia
    Un lugar llamado Notting Hill
    7.2
    Un lugar llamado Notting Hill
    El amor llama dos veces
    6.1
    El amor llama dos veces
    Love, Wedding, Marriage
    4.8
    Love, Wedding, Marriage
    Durmiendo con el enemigo
    6.3
    Durmiendo con el enemigo
    Closer. Llevados por el deseo
    7.1
    Closer. Llevados por el deseo

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      In order to prepare for their roles, the leads were all put through a finishing school two weeks prior to filming. However, in contrast to the film's depiction, Wellesley College was never a finishing school. It was a private women's liberal arts college which emphasized social activism.
    • Errores
      At the wedding, champagne is served in flute glasses. They were rarely used until the 1970s, when drier vintages became preferred. In the 1950s, champagne was served in champagne coupe (or saucer) glasses. They are still used in champagne fountains at weddings.
    • Citas

      Betty Warren: [Narrating] My teacher, Katherine Watson, lived by her own definition, and would not compromise that. Not even for *Wellesley*. I dedicate this, my last editorial, to an extraordinary woman who lived by example and compelled us all to see the world through new eyes. By the time you read this, she'll be sailing to Europe, where I know she'll find new walls to break down and new ideas to replace them with. I've heard her called a quitter for leaving, an aimless wanderer. But not all who wander are aimless, especially not those who seek truth beyond tradition, beyond definition, beyond the image.

    • Créditos curiosos
      The end credits for the prominent cast and crew are set in front of vintage footage and advertisements showing women in the 1940s and '50s.
    • Conexiones
      Featured in Late Night with Conan O'Brien: Jude Law/Maggie Gyllenhaal/Michelle Branch (2003)
    • Bandas sonoras
      Lift Thine Eyes
      from "Elijah"

      Written by Felix Mendelssohn

      Performed by Wellesley College Chamber Singers

      Lisa Graham Conductor

      Under license from Wellesley College Chamber Singers

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes

    • How long is Mona Lisa Smile?Con tecnología de Alexa
    • What's the idea behind the movie's title?
    • How does the movie end?

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 24 de diciembre de 2003 (México)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Sitios oficiales
      • Columbia Tristar (France)
      • Sony Pictures Entertainment
    • Idiomas
      • Inglés
      • Italiano
    • También se conoce como
      • Mona Lisa Smile
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Wellesley, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos
    • Productoras
      • Revolution Studios
      • Red Om Films
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • USD 65,000,000 (estimado)
    • Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 63,860,942
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 11,528,498
      • 21 dic 2003
    • Total a nivel mundial
      • USD 141,337,989
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 57 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    La sonrisa de Mona Lisa (2003)
    Principales brechas de datos
    What is the Japanese language plot outline for La sonrisa de Mona Lisa (2003)?
    Responda
    • Ver más datos faltantes
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.