CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
4.1 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Separados por un puesto de control, los amantes palestinos de Jerusalén y Ramallah organizan reuniones clandestinas.Separados por un puesto de control, los amantes palestinos de Jerusalén y Ramallah organizan reuniones clandestinas.Separados por un puesto de control, los amantes palestinos de Jerusalén y Ramallah organizan reuniones clandestinas.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 6 premios ganados y 2 nominaciones en total
Salwa Nakkara
- Adia
- (as Salvia Nakkara)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Amazing..
A film that has a crucial twist to what is happening in Israel today.
Two tribes at each others throat. However this isn't your usual mainstream war type, social issues, machine gun shoot type film. This is a film of quality..
Scenes are cut, a lot is left for the audience to tie up and conclude.. Directing at its best.
Powerful visions and photography.
You'll laugh.. but as the scene stays fix on the sketch.. you start thinking of the REAL message the director is giving you and believe you stop laughing.
I will definitely watch it again..
the balloon, the football, the Palestinian lady walking past and creating havoc to the Israeli border, the scene with the hands... all sketches that are unforgettable! Very symbolic...
A film that has a crucial twist to what is happening in Israel today.
Two tribes at each others throat. However this isn't your usual mainstream war type, social issues, machine gun shoot type film. This is a film of quality..
Scenes are cut, a lot is left for the audience to tie up and conclude.. Directing at its best.
Powerful visions and photography.
You'll laugh.. but as the scene stays fix on the sketch.. you start thinking of the REAL message the director is giving you and believe you stop laughing.
I will definitely watch it again..
the balloon, the football, the Palestinian lady walking past and creating havoc to the Israeli border, the scene with the hands... all sketches that are unforgettable! Very symbolic...
"Divine Intervention" is not a perfect film. Certain scenes go on too long. Some of the metaphors and symbolism are overdone and over-emphasized, and I'm still not sure how I feel about a crucial scene towards the end of the film, but overall when registering my vote for the film I, again, simply couldn't vote less than 10. It's hard to do so with such a unique film, and one which I feel is quite important and special, regardless of my own personal connection to the film and its subjects (like most of my father's family the filmmaker is a Palestinian Christian from Nazareth).
The film's tone is one of detached, bitter irony. It's an absurdist look at the conflict, at life under Israeli occupation. A far cry from many Palestinian (or Israeli) films, especially the likes of "Paradise Now" (a great film in its own right), with their emphasis on examining the conflict itself, the solutions available and the morality of the actions taken by desperate people on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides, "Divine Intervention" is ultimately about minor miseries and absurdities, an uncanny portrayal of the mundane, monotonous nature of living in Palestine- you're always at a checkpoint, even if you're not actually at one.
Checkpoints play a big part in the film. So do hands, eyes, footballs, balloons, post-it notes, Israeli authority figures, colorful language, and various other things. The opening half of the film is largely in a classic comedy tradition: sight gag after sight gag, with some uproariously (as far as I'm concerned) hilarious exchanges of dialogue, sadly some of this is lost in translation, but the film's humor is so overwhelmingly visual that this doesn't matter so much. The first time I saw the film some of the jokes didn't work for me and some did. Three viewings later it's easily one of the most satisfying comedies around.
The film's latter half is more intent on surreal, symbolic imagery. Imagery which retains the bitter irony and absurdist tendencies of the first half, but will surely be harder to swallow for most, especially as some of it can easily be misunderstood and misinterpreted. The more ambitious set-pieces are also more visually problematic, with dated CGI mixing with Suleiman's wonderful portraits of Jerusalem.
Most of the film's flaws are still in sequences I wouldn't dream of cutting out of the film. These scenes don't have the perfect timing and delivery of the comedy in the first half, which is much more subtle in its metaphorical and symbolic value than the latter half, but the film wouldn't work without them. It's a very odd film to say the least, and while I can complain about certain things I wouldn't have any suggestions on how to make them better.
"Divine Intervention" remains one of very, very few films to really capture what it means to be Palestinian and to have a Palestinian mindset. More interestingly the film is almost entirely from the perspective of Christians (I don't believe hijab is seen at any point in the film), eliminating the ever-present Jews vs. Muslims debate and focusing on Palestinian identity and Palestinian life. As a document of Palestinian life, absurd yet believable and shockingly realistic, it is invaluable. Yet the film achieves more. It has depth. It works as a comedy first and foremost, but always has significance and importance, something more to say.
The film is, ultimately, a collection of sketches, but they're brought together so well into a fairly cohesive whole that I can't understand the complaints about this aspect of the film. Some of the scenes are absolute classics, unforgettable even. The film has a wonderful visual sensibility, Suleiman's detachment extending beyond the writing and perspective to his camera which views these lives from a distance, static and observant, letting things play out against strikingly beautiful shots of Nazareth and Jerusalem. When Suleiman does go for motion it's for good reason. These shots tend to be ambitious and crucially important and are consistently well-realized by him and his crew.
Something of a forgotten film, opening to mixed reviews and an extremely limited run in North America, "Divine Intervention" remains one of the most deserving Jury Prize winners at Cannes. It's not surprising that the Europeans were more receptive, it's just a shame that this movie is such a tough sell to fellow North Americans, even film buffs, mostly because it's so relatively unheard of. Too bad, it's really great.
The film's tone is one of detached, bitter irony. It's an absurdist look at the conflict, at life under Israeli occupation. A far cry from many Palestinian (or Israeli) films, especially the likes of "Paradise Now" (a great film in its own right), with their emphasis on examining the conflict itself, the solutions available and the morality of the actions taken by desperate people on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides, "Divine Intervention" is ultimately about minor miseries and absurdities, an uncanny portrayal of the mundane, monotonous nature of living in Palestine- you're always at a checkpoint, even if you're not actually at one.
Checkpoints play a big part in the film. So do hands, eyes, footballs, balloons, post-it notes, Israeli authority figures, colorful language, and various other things. The opening half of the film is largely in a classic comedy tradition: sight gag after sight gag, with some uproariously (as far as I'm concerned) hilarious exchanges of dialogue, sadly some of this is lost in translation, but the film's humor is so overwhelmingly visual that this doesn't matter so much. The first time I saw the film some of the jokes didn't work for me and some did. Three viewings later it's easily one of the most satisfying comedies around.
The film's latter half is more intent on surreal, symbolic imagery. Imagery which retains the bitter irony and absurdist tendencies of the first half, but will surely be harder to swallow for most, especially as some of it can easily be misunderstood and misinterpreted. The more ambitious set-pieces are also more visually problematic, with dated CGI mixing with Suleiman's wonderful portraits of Jerusalem.
Most of the film's flaws are still in sequences I wouldn't dream of cutting out of the film. These scenes don't have the perfect timing and delivery of the comedy in the first half, which is much more subtle in its metaphorical and symbolic value than the latter half, but the film wouldn't work without them. It's a very odd film to say the least, and while I can complain about certain things I wouldn't have any suggestions on how to make them better.
"Divine Intervention" remains one of very, very few films to really capture what it means to be Palestinian and to have a Palestinian mindset. More interestingly the film is almost entirely from the perspective of Christians (I don't believe hijab is seen at any point in the film), eliminating the ever-present Jews vs. Muslims debate and focusing on Palestinian identity and Palestinian life. As a document of Palestinian life, absurd yet believable and shockingly realistic, it is invaluable. Yet the film achieves more. It has depth. It works as a comedy first and foremost, but always has significance and importance, something more to say.
The film is, ultimately, a collection of sketches, but they're brought together so well into a fairly cohesive whole that I can't understand the complaints about this aspect of the film. Some of the scenes are absolute classics, unforgettable even. The film has a wonderful visual sensibility, Suleiman's detachment extending beyond the writing and perspective to his camera which views these lives from a distance, static and observant, letting things play out against strikingly beautiful shots of Nazareth and Jerusalem. When Suleiman does go for motion it's for good reason. These shots tend to be ambitious and crucially important and are consistently well-realized by him and his crew.
Something of a forgotten film, opening to mixed reviews and an extremely limited run in North America, "Divine Intervention" remains one of the most deserving Jury Prize winners at Cannes. It's not surprising that the Europeans were more receptive, it's just a shame that this movie is such a tough sell to fellow North Americans, even film buffs, mostly because it's so relatively unheard of. Too bad, it's really great.
I remember seeing a clip from this film which involved Palestinians at a roadblock having to endure humiliation from the Israeli soldiers manning it . The scene then cuts to the Palestinian protagonist stopping his car beside a Jewish settler . I was expecting something to happen at this point but nothing did and decided to catch DIVINE INTERVENTION when it made an appearance at the Edinburgh filmhouse very recently to see if it made sense in a wider context
I'll say one thing about Elia Suleiman and that is he know's how to hook an audience in to a story since this contains a truly memorable opening sequence where a much loved icon meets with some violence which will distress anyone who's hoping for some Christmas gifts . Unfortunately he's unable to continue the momentum of this and we quickly find ourselves in Michaelangelo Antonioni territory . It's been said that both Buster Keaton and Jacques Tati have influenced Suleiman but I believe Antonioni has a far more obvious effect . For example a character offers cigarettes to two other characters who then wave their hands in to shot showing that they are already holding lit cigarettes something the character would have been aware of but not the audience . Other examples would be the exploding tank which seems to have been inspired by ZABRASKIE POINT , or a character continually being told there's no bus as he stands at a bus stop and , but perhaps the most obvious example would be the ending involving a pressure cooker . Antonioni likes to irritate the audience with portent enigmas and Elia Suleiman has done the same here along with a few stylistic nods to Robert Bresson
Unfortunately many people on this site and the handful of people in the audience of The Edinburgh Filmhouse seem to have misunderstood DIVINE INTERVENTION somewhat . This was most obvious during the discussion afterwards held by a distinguished epistemological film critic tried to concentrate on the ideas and influences behind the film and kept having the subject changed by useless idiots who were compelled to inform us all they knew about " fascist Israelis " and how the film didn't go far enough in " showing the brutality of the Israeli occupation " . Duh well it's not about the " brutality of the Israeli occupation " - it's about the absurdity of life under occupation and of the wider absurdity of everyday life . If you go and watch this film with a closed mind then you'll fail to understand it . DIVINE INTERVENTION isn't a great film but it's certainly one that can be appreciated by cinephilles rather more than mindless politicised idiots of what ever side of the Middle Eastern fence they're on
I'll say one thing about Elia Suleiman and that is he know's how to hook an audience in to a story since this contains a truly memorable opening sequence where a much loved icon meets with some violence which will distress anyone who's hoping for some Christmas gifts . Unfortunately he's unable to continue the momentum of this and we quickly find ourselves in Michaelangelo Antonioni territory . It's been said that both Buster Keaton and Jacques Tati have influenced Suleiman but I believe Antonioni has a far more obvious effect . For example a character offers cigarettes to two other characters who then wave their hands in to shot showing that they are already holding lit cigarettes something the character would have been aware of but not the audience . Other examples would be the exploding tank which seems to have been inspired by ZABRASKIE POINT , or a character continually being told there's no bus as he stands at a bus stop and , but perhaps the most obvious example would be the ending involving a pressure cooker . Antonioni likes to irritate the audience with portent enigmas and Elia Suleiman has done the same here along with a few stylistic nods to Robert Bresson
Unfortunately many people on this site and the handful of people in the audience of The Edinburgh Filmhouse seem to have misunderstood DIVINE INTERVENTION somewhat . This was most obvious during the discussion afterwards held by a distinguished epistemological film critic tried to concentrate on the ideas and influences behind the film and kept having the subject changed by useless idiots who were compelled to inform us all they knew about " fascist Israelis " and how the film didn't go far enough in " showing the brutality of the Israeli occupation " . Duh well it's not about the " brutality of the Israeli occupation " - it's about the absurdity of life under occupation and of the wider absurdity of everyday life . If you go and watch this film with a closed mind then you'll fail to understand it . DIVINE INTERVENTION isn't a great film but it's certainly one that can be appreciated by cinephilles rather more than mindless politicised idiots of what ever side of the Middle Eastern fence they're on
Like others who have commented on this film, I, too, cannot stop thinking about it... thinking about how I was lured to the theater by a very good trailer that was crafted, I'm sure, to appeal to my interest in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, my concerns with world affairs and other cultures. I was used!
From beginning to end, a chain of weak metaphors... Nothing Divine - no intervention. Pure tedium.
Best metaphor? At the very end, a pressure cooker - and the old lady saying "Turn it off."
I can't remember being this disappointed - ever - in a movie that I was so excited about seeing. I didn't laugh, I didn't cry ... Perhaps I should though; for the potential of all that this subject should have inspired in a truly creative and thoughtful writer/director. For shame.
From beginning to end, a chain of weak metaphors... Nothing Divine - no intervention. Pure tedium.
Best metaphor? At the very end, a pressure cooker - and the old lady saying "Turn it off."
I can't remember being this disappointed - ever - in a movie that I was so excited about seeing. I didn't laugh, I didn't cry ... Perhaps I should though; for the potential of all that this subject should have inspired in a truly creative and thoughtful writer/director. For shame.
Brilliant politics mixed mixed with very black, subtle comedy make up this very slightly surreal and funny movie about life and love in Israel.
However, I wouldn't recommend this film for everybody, don't watch it if you're looking for an easy movie, it takes a lot of mental energy to really understand this movie, however if you're in the movie for an intellectual treat, its quite fun.
This movie has the subtle humor and lack of dialogue of a tati movie with the politics and vignette fashion of a Bunuel.
Overall, it's good, yet many of the political references are extremely obscure and the metaphors aren't always clear.
However, I wouldn't recommend this film for everybody, don't watch it if you're looking for an easy movie, it takes a lot of mental energy to really understand this movie, however if you're in the movie for an intellectual treat, its quite fun.
This movie has the subtle humor and lack of dialogue of a tati movie with the politics and vignette fashion of a Bunuel.
Overall, it's good, yet many of the political references are extremely obscure and the metaphors aren't always clear.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film was only submitted once to the Academy. Though the Academy did consider it, it did not make the final cut of the top five films in the world. There was some misinformation about why the Academy didn't consider the film the first time. The American distributor claimed he called AMPAS and asked them if they would consider it and was told they would not because Palestine is not a country recognized by the Academy. In fact, the Academy spokesperson said that the film was not considered the first year because it was never submitted. The second time it WAS considered but didn't win a nomination. The AMPAS spokesman also said that it's not their job to decide who is a country and who isn't as the UN decides that. It should be noted that Taiwan and Hong Kong are also not recognized by the UN as "official countries" but have had films nominated by the Academy.
- ErroresAt the border, when several cars are told to turn around, the camera is reflected in the side of the cars for several seconds.
- ConexionesFeatured in Humbert Balsan, producteur rebelle (2006)
- Bandas sonorasDefinitive Beat
By Mirwaise
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Divine Intervention?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Divine Intervention
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 421,343
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 13,228
- 19 ene 2003
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,679,544
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta