Naked News

I've seen this on the web long, long ago. I decided to pay the 5 bucks for the TV version and OH MY GOD WHAT A JOKE!!!!

Great looking reporters? All but one. I won't name names. Pretty cool that they get naked while reporting the news? Yes most certainly. Is the news.. .NEWS WORTHY? Not on the TV version it wasn't. Good lord out dated news stories and silly sketches with some HORRIFIC ACTING!! At least porn stars put in a little more effort in there bad acting.

Back when I first saw this on the web the main reporter whose name I think was victoria had the best presentation and appearence doesn't seem to be on the show any more. Too bad because from what I saw all of them were pretty bad. Maybe it was just the content.

The episode I saw kept referring to Burlesque and man was it ever bad. WHO WROTE THIS CRAP? Give these poor girls something to read and report on! Or at least pay for them to take some local community college courses in journalism and have them do there own stories.

I really enjoy this..so fun and awesome.this is a good idea to watch news

This has to be the Best News Program I have ever Seen! You might think I'm shallow, but, well, who gives a rats ass? This show is up to date with the latest news... plus it has lots of Naked Women.

I think its a great idea for a show. It gets more Viewers watching the News and remembering stuff. For example, have you ever watched a porno loads of times and then you hear the same background music somewhere else and you automatically remember the porno? Thats what the Naked News does, so say you're at a bar and someone is talking about the war on Iraq, then your Knowledge for the War floods back into you brain just from watching the Naked Ladies, I mean, News.

So, Watch the Naked News. It Makes you Intelligent!

When this was new, it was really worth watching. Now, if you're not a subscriber, it's hardly worth the effort. Even if I was a subscriber, I'm not sure it would be worth the time. The writing has become stale, and the girls are getting tiresome.

Plus, great-looking past hosts like have gone. I really miss gals like Brooke, Gretchen and Carmen while they retain annoying chicks like Lilly and Sandrine.

Oh well, thanks for the memories, girls.

From some dank basement in downtown Toronto, The Naked News has been delivering pop-culture cheddar to the Internet since 1999. For a monthly or yearly subscription fee, people can see lipstick feminists shaking their moneymakers all in the name of Girl Power.

Imagine Entertainment Tonight or some lurid sex show with nude women...that's The Naked News. 20-25 minutes, 6 times a week of "sexy" women reading off of a telestrator. You should see these women as a lot of them have massive egos and think they are worthy of having shrines built to them. The good and beautiful anchors are the ones who realize the whole racket is just to be tongue-and-cheek and not to be taken seriously (Eila Adams, Madison Banes, Angie Heyward, Carli Bei, Isabella Rossini) but the women who shove their agendas down people's throats are unbearable.

First, we have Katherine Curtis. Ms. Curtis is a self-proclaimed nerd and humorless ultra-leftist bitch who acts like she is above everyone. The entire time she shows up on camera she flaunts her massive ego and spews her ridiculous ultra leftist beliefs to everybody while thinking she still has a killer body. Back in 2007 she was hot stuff, now, not so much with the flabby backside. She is also a co-writer and co-producer (as is Eila) but you can tell what segments she wrote.

Next is Peyton Priestly, Ms. "I only eat organic food and support animal rights". Certainly a great all-natural body but a nasally and annoying voice and sporting a massive ego to boot.

Then we have her identical twin sister Whitney St. John, who is only there when school is out. She has fake bosoms, wears nerd glasses to show how "smart" she is and thinks she's a big deal. She talks like a school professor.

Finally we have Natasha Olenski and Andrea Sully, two women from the Eastern Bloc. Olenski is not beautiful at all unless you like bad breast augmentation and while Sully's work is better, her behind is as flat as a board and both have voices that grate on my ears.

Despite the motto "The Program With Nothing To Hide" the location of their studio is a guarded secret. Of course, they do come out and do topless interviews made possible by my province's Topfree laws. They do lame man-on-the-street interviews about trivial stuff to bemused people embarrassed to be on camera.

The real kicker is the forced repartee between the ladies. It's painful to watch. It sounds like a conversation between women who deep down hate each other's guts but must pretend to be buddies. When you watch the local news, you can tell there's camaraderie between the anchors. Not here. Then again, I wouldn't want to be near Ms. Curtis, Ms. Priestly or Ms. St. John, either. Nothing like being told what to do with you life, eh?

If you want to pay for an overpriced subscription to be bored to death half the time by women spewing leftist policies on their audiences just to see those anchors that don't take themselves seriously then go on ahead.