CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.8/10
7.9 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Años después de la muerte de su hija, una madre recibe una llamada telefónica de alguien que dice ser su hija pero un grupo secreto llamado The Nameless puede estar detrás de todo.Años después de la muerte de su hija, una madre recibe una llamada telefónica de alguien que dice ser su hija pero un grupo secreto llamado The Nameless puede estar detrás de todo.Años después de la muerte de su hija, una madre recibe una llamada telefónica de alguien que dice ser su hija pero un grupo secreto llamado The Nameless puede estar detrás de todo.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 16 premios ganados y 5 nominaciones en total
Susana García Díez
- Chica piscina
- (as Susana García)
Víctor Guillén
- Hombre flaco
- (as Víctor Guillén 'Buby')
Josep Maria Domènech
- Romero
- (as Josep Mª Domenech)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
You're walking through an amusement park. All the rides around you look wonderfully scary and thrilling; they taunt you as you pass them, they promise something different, something new, at journey's end.
The final ride is a fiberglass pony in front of the supermarket.
That's the "Los Sin Nombre" experience. You, the viewer, watch as the protagonist follows clues to find her daughter -- a girl supposedly tortured and killed but now, 5 years later, apparently living. With the help of the detective who handled the original case, she stumbles from clue to clue and into...uh...well, it gets hazy. A cult dedicated to "synthesizing the ultimate evil" through "the final atrocity" and "mastering pain", because "evil is a key". A good idea crops up hither and yon, and gets you waiting, waiting for The Big Finish.
After some disturbing imagery, a whole lot of "Oh, yeah?" clues, some confusion as to why this guy named Toni is following Mom around, the overuse of the "choppily-edited-video-is-creepy!" effect and the introduction of a character whom we're asked to care about and then gets whacked, the final reveal arrives...and then...uh...the movie ends.
But the final reveal is so totally mundane in relation to the rest of the film as to feel as let-down, a waste of energy spent in caring how it will end.
This film is all style -- all tired, overdone style. Oooh, look, everything's bleak and cold-looking! Oooh, look, choppily-edited nightmare imagery! Oooh, look, clues on a videotape! Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Yeah, I know, I said the same thing.
"The Nameless". It's in Spanish. There's some icky stuff and some fodder for your "Call of Cthulhu" game. Your call.
Bring some coins for that pony.
The final ride is a fiberglass pony in front of the supermarket.
That's the "Los Sin Nombre" experience. You, the viewer, watch as the protagonist follows clues to find her daughter -- a girl supposedly tortured and killed but now, 5 years later, apparently living. With the help of the detective who handled the original case, she stumbles from clue to clue and into...uh...well, it gets hazy. A cult dedicated to "synthesizing the ultimate evil" through "the final atrocity" and "mastering pain", because "evil is a key". A good idea crops up hither and yon, and gets you waiting, waiting for The Big Finish.
After some disturbing imagery, a whole lot of "Oh, yeah?" clues, some confusion as to why this guy named Toni is following Mom around, the overuse of the "choppily-edited-video-is-creepy!" effect and the introduction of a character whom we're asked to care about and then gets whacked, the final reveal arrives...and then...uh...the movie ends.
But the final reveal is so totally mundane in relation to the rest of the film as to feel as let-down, a waste of energy spent in caring how it will end.
This film is all style -- all tired, overdone style. Oooh, look, everything's bleak and cold-looking! Oooh, look, choppily-edited nightmare imagery! Oooh, look, clues on a videotape! Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Yeah, I know, I said the same thing.
"The Nameless". It's in Spanish. There's some icky stuff and some fodder for your "Call of Cthulhu" game. Your call.
Bring some coins for that pony.
How to say......It is a disappointing film for me. The set up of this film is really promising: The first 10 minutes of the film and the story starts by saying "A girl was killed five years ago, and now the mother gets a call from her". This idea really can be developed into something really scary, and creepy. However, after the 10 minutes of the film, the story gets really slow and boring. The ending is especially disappointing, nothing that is really "unspeakly" evil, or out of the ordinary. It is just plain disappointing. ( Maybe it is because I am not a parent so that I don't understand the pain of losing a child...... ...... ) I don't know how many you guys in here are also fans of the TV games serial "Silent Hill" ( In PS, and PS2 ). The success of this serial indicates that even the use of cult can be developed into something really creepy, and surreal. Well, anyway, I am not sure it is just because I get toooo used to scary games, and movies, so that even though some people in here say they find "The Nameless" very scary, I find it plain boring.
One who did not see the movie may be surprise by all the contrasting comments ranging from "LAME" to "EXCELLENT". But there is a simple answer to this: There are 2 types o movie-goers: those who let themselves go and get involved in the story, and those who stay in a safe shell of rationality and judge from the outside. So, this movie lives on atmosphere and the mood it is able to arouse, and in this it works greatly, it really scares. But to a cold-minded analisys, it reveals flaws in the plot. Anyway, I think that RATIONAL-AT-ALL-COSTS people should simply give up with horror movies: their inner cords just can't be reached... For all the other ones, you should watch this movie, becasue it is a scary movie that really scares, and features excellent acting and direction. The only right criticism regards the ending. I suppose that they could have done better, not necessarily changing WHAT happens, but possibly HOW it is described. But it is still a decent final, and the movie is a well worth experience.
I saw this film a few years back and have been a supporter of Balaguero ever since! It starts on a very disturbing note and then constantly pushes and pushes your buttons. I can only compare it to being on a torture rack and in pain from the start only to have the cogs turned constantly and very slowly increasing my agony for every minute of my time spent on it until i reach my limit only to realise that the end is SO much nastier now that they have stopped turning the cogs that a totally unforseen pain and agony is about to hit me just when i thought it was over! The tension levels are very slowly but expertly cranked up throughout this film from the opening moments until the very end...and even THEN the cruelest of climaxes awaits us. I have read comments about the ending to this film that do not do it justice or feel that it does not work. I cannot understand or share that viewpoint. Any such accusations levelled at this film are lacking. The climax is simple, yet one of the most intelligent, psychologically perverse, emotion-shredding and horrible (without resorting to blood) ever commited to celluloid. On it's own it would pack a seriously intense punch...but as the climax/pay-off/culmination of such a profoundly creepy film it is downright cruel and disturbing and a fitting finale to a soul-destroying film... Balaguero's style has been disregarded by some as too similar to that of David Fincher. Well, the similarities in LOOK are there but style isn't based on cinematography alone. The film is a beautifully dark, stylish, polished affair with menace in the shadows, angst around every corner and terror on the horizon. Dread and evil have not been portrayed this vividly for a long, long time...
Rented this film with no expectations at all. For the largest part of the film I did not regret one second to have rented it. Well, perhaps because it was too scary... The way it is filmed and the music along with it makes it a very good thriller. This is a perfect example I believe of the difference between an American film and a European film. And in this case I definitely prefer the latter. The grim atmosphere and the constant pressure keep you on the edge of your seat throughout the whole movie. But unfortunately, all good things come to an end and in Los sin nombre, this is before the end of the film. I can't spoil anything of course, but I personally was very disappointed with the end of this film. It left me with an unsatisfied feeling.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaBased on the British novel "The Nameless" by Ramsey Campbell.
- ErroresOn the newspaper page that mentions Santini's conviction, you can read the word "corpses" with typos ("cadaberes" with b and no accent, when it should be "cadáveres").
- ConexionesFeatures Killer berberechos (1996)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Nameless?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- EUR 900,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 3,904,286
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 42 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for La secta (1999)?
Responda