Sho o suteyo machi e deyô
- 1971
- 2h 17min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.6/10
2.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un adolescente angustiado por su familia disfuncional sale a la calle. La historia se entrecruza con varias viñetas psicodélicas y llenas de energía.Un adolescente angustiado por su familia disfuncional sale a la calle. La historia se entrecruza con varias viñetas psicodélicas y llenas de energía.Un adolescente angustiado por su familia disfuncional sale a la calle. La historia se entrecruza con varias viñetas psicodélicas y llenas de energía.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Eimei Sasaki
- Hideaki Kitamura
- (as Hideaki Sasaki)
Naomi Asaka
- Doctor
- (as Izumi Suzuki)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I like to take a chance with the films I watch - sometimes it pays off, other times I wish I'd just skipped over it. This film belongs in the latter category.
It really was awful... The characters are abhorrent, the dialogue is nonsensical, the use of green and purple filters is nauseating, It's just a horrendous viewing experience. Not to mention the scenes of gang rape, bestiality and animal cruelty, all accompanied by a cacophony of screams, wails and weird chanting, used simply to shock the viewer and further twist the dystopian society this film presents us with. The worst example of art-house cinema... I advise you to stay clear.
...The prostitution song was fun though ;)
It really was awful... The characters are abhorrent, the dialogue is nonsensical, the use of green and purple filters is nauseating, It's just a horrendous viewing experience. Not to mention the scenes of gang rape, bestiality and animal cruelty, all accompanied by a cacophony of screams, wails and weird chanting, used simply to shock the viewer and further twist the dystopian society this film presents us with. The worst example of art-house cinema... I advise you to stay clear.
...The prostitution song was fun though ;)
Surreal, experimental, loud, and chaotic, yet in other words, pointless, disjointed, perplexing, and unsatisfying. The epitome of style over substance. Filled with numerous overlong, inexplicable, and unnecessary scenes that tries so hard to deviate from linear storytelling yet at the same time failing to delve into it's main themes of teenage rebellion. I found it frustrating not to learn anything substantial about the protagonist, who oddly lacks screen time and remains nameless. Let alone his family. The surreal elements lack appeal and fail to provide significant artistic value, ultimately leaving me bewildered. Even the music fails to capture my attention as well. In the end, I was left disappointed. I really wanted to like it though.
I am not very familiar with Japanese cinematography. I think the number of Japanese films I've ever watched can be counted on one hand, and I don't remember being particulary excited for any of them. However, this one is an exception. From the first seconds, you realise that the movie isn't your ordinary movie that you're used watching on a week-to-week basis (it was actually hard to believe that such a level of meta could already be present in the 1970s, but hey, it's Japan we're dealing with here - there's nothing strange about them being 30 years ahead of all of us). After the intriguing opening scene, "Throw Away Your Books, Rally in the Streets" continues to pleasently surprise its viewer until the closing scene, which is nicely bookmarks the entire story... no, not the story - the performance.
Fortunately the Sydney JFF had an excellent print off this masterpiece.
The use of colour is important to the director in aiding dream sequence and as part of the surrealism.
After being bored and not able to finish watching nitram 2021 the day before it was a real pleasure to be engrossed by a sort of Godard of the East.
The playful use of the media to create this film is always engaging and question the viewers relationship to what is on the screen.
Cinema that challenges our perception of itself requires real skill to be effective.
This tale entertains us while also achieving that. A little less demanding than Godard still done with a strong command of the tools available.
Music is a real takeaway. Being used really well and adding so much and yet now a snapshot of its time era
Best seen on the big screen!
The use of colour is important to the director in aiding dream sequence and as part of the surrealism.
After being bored and not able to finish watching nitram 2021 the day before it was a real pleasure to be engrossed by a sort of Godard of the East.
The playful use of the media to create this film is always engaging and question the viewers relationship to what is on the screen.
Cinema that challenges our perception of itself requires real skill to be effective.
This tale entertains us while also achieving that. A little less demanding than Godard still done with a strong command of the tools available.
Music is a real takeaway. Being used really well and adding so much and yet now a snapshot of its time era
Best seen on the big screen!
This is why cinema is the superior art form. It started its journey in exactly the opposite way literature did. Literature was for the wealthy, educated people...then arrived to the masses slowly with more and more inferior books. And cinema started for the illiterate masses and relatively fast conquered the intellectuals as well. But that's what I'm trying to say, cinema was a more generous art form for humanity. It captured the human curiosity with a huge force.
Terayama should have instead just embraced and used every cinematic tool to enforce the idea that, comparatively, cinema is the more profound one because of its form factor, package and universality. He instead chose to place it at the same level with literature and condemn both, by association. It's all over the place but the title is something we always come back to, so we get the gist of it all. He places both categories of intellectuals (book and cinema) in the same boat.
Go outside sometimes and live life. Interact with your society, on all levels, understand it and make it better at the end of the day along with you, as an individual.
Terayama should have instead just embraced and used every cinematic tool to enforce the idea that, comparatively, cinema is the more profound one because of its form factor, package and universality. He instead chose to place it at the same level with literature and condemn both, by association. It's all over the place but the title is something we always come back to, so we get the gist of it all. He places both categories of intellectuals (book and cinema) in the same boat.
Go outside sometimes and live life. Interact with your society, on all levels, understand it and make it better at the end of the day along with you, as an individual.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis film was once apart of the Official Top 250 Narrative Feature Films on Letterboxd.
- Citas
Priest: At our Old People's Society, we've learned a lot from the American system. In America...
Grandmother: I don't like America.
Priest: Even people who don't like America like running hot water, their own cars, Hollywood movies, a high standard of living.
- ConexionesFeatured in Century of Cinema: Nihon eiga no hyaku nen (1995)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Throw Away Your Books, Rally in the Streets?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Throw Away Your Books, Rally in the Streets
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 17 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Sho o suteyo machi e deyô (1971) officially released in India in English?
Responda