[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

Enemigo al acecho

Título original: Enemy at the Gates
  • 2001
  • B
  • 2h 11min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.5/10
287 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
POPULARIDAD
2,156
658
Jude Law and Joseph Fiennes in Enemigo al acecho (2001)
Pre, "Coming Soon"
Reproducir trailer2:22
1 video
99+ fotos
Period DramaWar EpicActionDramaWar

Un francotirador ruso y uno alemán juegan al gato y al ratón durante la Batalla de Stalingrado.Un francotirador ruso y uno alemán juegan al gato y al ratón durante la Batalla de Stalingrado.Un francotirador ruso y uno alemán juegan al gato y al ratón durante la Batalla de Stalingrado.

  • Dirección
    • Jean-Jacques Annaud
  • Guionistas
    • Jean-Jacques Annaud
    • Alain Godard
  • Elenco
    • Jude Law
    • Ed Harris
    • Joseph Fiennes
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    7.5/10
    287 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    POPULARIDAD
    2,156
    658
    • Dirección
      • Jean-Jacques Annaud
    • Guionistas
      • Jean-Jacques Annaud
      • Alain Godard
    • Elenco
      • Jude Law
      • Ed Harris
      • Joseph Fiennes
    • 763Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 92Opiniones de los críticos
    • 53Metascore
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 7 nominaciones en total

    Videos1

    Enemy at the Gates
    Trailer 2:22
    Enemy at the Gates

    Fotos150

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 143
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal69

    Editar
    Jude Law
    Jude Law
    • Vasily Zaitsev
    Ed Harris
    Ed Harris
    • Major Erwin König
    Joseph Fiennes
    Joseph Fiennes
    • Commisar Danilov
    Rachel Weisz
    Rachel Weisz
    • Tania Chernova
    Bob Hoskins
    Bob Hoskins
    • Nikita Khrushchev
    Ron Perlman
    Ron Perlman
    • Koulikov
    Eva Mattes
    Eva Mattes
    • Mother Filipov
    Gabriel Thomson
    Gabriel Thomson
    • Sacha Filipov
    • (as Gabriel Marshall-Thomson)
    Matthias Habich
    Matthias Habich
    • General Paulus
    Sophie Rois
    Sophie Rois
    • Ludmilla
    Ivan Shvedoff
    Ivan Shvedoff
    • Volodya
    Mario Bandi
    • Anton
    Hans-Martin Stier
    Hans-Martin Stier
    • Red Army General
    • (as Hans Martin Stier)
    Clemens Schick
    Clemens Schick
    • German NCO
    • (as Clemans Schick)
    Mikhail Matveev
    • Grandfather
    Alexander Schwan
    • Young Vassili Zaitsev
    Lenn Kudrjawizki
    Lenn Kudrjawizki
    • Comrade in Train
    Hendrik Arnst
    • Fat Colonel
    • Dirección
      • Jean-Jacques Annaud
    • Guionistas
      • Jean-Jacques Annaud
      • Alain Godard
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios763

    7.5287.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    8SnoopyStyle

    compelling war movie

    It's the fall of 1942. Vassili Zaitsev (Jude Law) grew up hunting with his father in the woods. He, Tania (Rachel Weisz) and countless other untrained recruits are brought up to the front at Stalingrad. He and Commisar Danilov (Joseph Fiennes) survive a suicidal charge. Vassili kills 5 Germans in the aftermath and Danilov writes about him. Nikita Khrushchev (Bob Hoskins) seizes the opportunity to make him a star. Opposing him is the aristocratic German sniper Major König (Ed Harris).

    The opening is an amazing opera of mass destruction. Then it's a matter of a chess game. It's a fascinating cat and mouse game in the ruins of the city. I'm glad that nobody decided to talk in a fake Russian accent. That would be too distracting. This is a rare good American war movie not about Americans.
    Spleen

    Uh, guys, there's a war on

    No doubt the title is an indication of what the film would LIKE to be about. The Germans forces were indeed "at the gates" - they are on the verge of capturing Stalingrad, they would lay siege to Leningrad, and at one point even Moscow appeared to be in danger. The situation was desperate. But after we're told all this, the position of the German army turns out to have no more to do with the story than the position of the sun in the zodiac. After a bitter, violent battle over - well, we're never told - nothing of a military nature happens again. Not even offstage. (Until the end, when, after a brief "offensive" of unfathomable significance, an epilogue tells us that the Germans were repelled from after all.) All the action in Stalingrad freezes so that we can watch a protracted duel between a Russian and a German sniper.

    Now I'm prepared to believe that snipers played a valuable role in this kind of warfare - I wouldn't know - but Vassili's primary value, we must assume in the absence of information to the contrary, is as propaganda - a means of keeping up the morale of the local troops. But there's something circular here. The snipers are the only people we see doing any actual fighting, and by the end of the film they seem to be devoting all their efforts to shooting a German sniper who is in turn doing nothing but trying to shoot Vassili. What does ANY of this have to do with, you know, the invasion?

    The fact that the troops of a hostile foreign power are on Russian soil (they haven't yet been defeated, and it looks to be only a matter of time before even Moscow would be overrun) doesn't seem to motivate the characters to do much. Nobody makes a single decision for the good of the war effort as a whole. Danilov builds up the Vassili legend because of personal feelings and is ready to tear it down later for other personal reasons; Tania wants to kill Germans - kill them herself, by hand, rather than help her fellow soldiers as best she can by working in intelligence - because they killed her parents; Danilov tries to transfer her to a safer job not because that's where she should be (it's a mere coincidence that that IS where she should be), but because he's hitting on to her; Vassili's heart isn't in the duel with the German sniper until he has a casual acquaintance's death to avenge. When Sacha's mother is told that her son is a traitor (now serving the forces who have bombed the city she grew up in to rubble), her only reaction is, "Perhaps he'll be safer with them than with us." Wherever we look, we see dreary personal concerns. Did any of these people notice that the enemy IS at the gates?

    If Anaud was trying to make his characters more plausible by making them pettier, he failed. When Sacha tells a third party what we supposedly already know - that Tania is in love with Vassili - it came as news to me. I hadn't seen any insipient love anywhere. I suppose I ought to have worked it out, by assuming that the single female character must be there to fall in love with someone and using a process of elimination to work out who it was (she plainly didn't care for one of the two candidates, therefore she must be head over heels with the other one), but really, even in a movie as dull as this, I have better things to do.
    Hollywood Chief

    Open these gates and let people in

    After watching such films as "Saving Private Ryan" and "Patton;" I have come to appreciate war films. For this reason, I decided to see the latest war film, "Enemy At The Gates."

    "Enemy At The Gates" may be one of the best war films I have seen since "Saving Private Ryan" because it is executed perfectly. With incredible performances, script and the impact I felt; "Enemy At The Gates" sets the tone as the first great war film of the 22nd century. This film can be served as the appetizer to the main course coming out soon, "Pearl Harbor."

    Jude Law, Joseph Feinnes, Rachel Weisz, Ed Harris and Bob Hoskins come together to re-visit the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942. The best thing about seeing each one of the actors perform was they all gave 100 percent effort to make the film as real as possible; they did an excellent job. Fiennes, Weisz and Hoskins were the icing to a cake that was delicious from the start.

    The highlights of "Enemy At The Gates" always came when Law and Harris were on screen because they played excellent psychological mind games with one another to win; furthermore, it was like watching master chess players playing for the grand prize. It was also enjoyable to see the strategies and tactics each would use to out-maneuver the other.

    "Enemy At The Gates" drew me with its many action sequences similar to those in "Saving Priate Ryan." Also, the love triangle between the three main leads was interesting to watch and see how it would unfold. I felt like I was in the movie because the writer did an excellent job at making me feel exactly what they felt and experience what they were going through.

    There is no rule that states dialogue is needed for a successful film. While "Enemy At The Gates" has dialogue, the scenes that have none stand out in my mind the most because we see close-ups of both snipers and the expressions on their faces. This is incredible to me because the intensity shown on their faces speaks volumes about what the movie is really about.

    This may not be the best war film ever made but with two of the brightest young stars on the rise, an actress that is here to stay and a veteran that continues to turn in knock-out performances, "Enemy At The Gates" will be remembered for a long time.
    Pastor Shlug

    A joke, from both a historical and a cinematic points of view

    First of all, I think it was a mistake for the screenwriters to pick and choose such a big event in the history of WWII, a turning point so to speak, only to have it placed as a background, to something so much less significant, a duel between two snipers. If one has never read anything historical or seen any chronological movies about battle of Stalingrad, or any other battle for that matter before seeing this movie, one might even wonder, how did Russians win the war at all? With one rifle per four hands? Against tanks? And aircraft? And heavy artillery? You know there's only so much even a drunken Russian can do with his ½ of a rifle. I see all these peoples' comments complaining that the main characters' accents were too British or too American and that that spoiled the true Russian Character, however the Hollywood makers portray that to be. But, being Russian myself, I saw nothing in the movie, at least on the Russian side, that resembled any truth to even how people spoke to each other, how they interacted with each other. They just didn't seem Russian to me, and it didn't matter what accents they used. These characters were biased cardboard characters, speaking cardboard character lines, and acting, well, cardboard-like. In the opening scenes of the movie they show a bunch of unarmed people thrown into battle only to be massacred by well armed Germans. That's a crock of sh*t, pardon my Russian. Basically by 1942, Hitler's army was fighting on two fronts, and it was very, very tired. Both sides were. Both sides were running out of people and supplies. Mostly, Battle of Stalingrad was a two-steps-forward-one-step-back kind of war. People charging and taking over some useless strategic point and then being thrown back, and then charging again. It was a battle to see who had a bigger stamina, because both sides were low in numbers. But it was also a battle involving tanks, artillery, and planes on BOTH sides. In the movie they omitted that, showing us diving Stukas, and yet surprisingly, no anti-aircraft guns firing at them, no Russian planes in the sky, just two soldiers armed with one rifle. Bullsh*t. No number of Vasiliy Zaycevs or Tatyana Whoevers would be able to stand off, and more even, reverse the tide of war against Germans, without having, basically an equally, if not better, equipped army at their side. If you look at the numbers, about 250,000 German and about 100,000 Russian soldiers lost their lives over Stalingrad. Well from the movie it might seem the opposite. Plus the whole mood of the movie. Russian soldiers, seemed no different from prisoners, defending Stalingrad only because of the muzzles pointed at their backs. But actually, believe it or not, many of these people were defending their motherland, their wives, daughters, sons, etc. and they were doing it not because they were to be shot otherwise, but because they loved their country and believed in its future. True, there were special NKVD units that were ordered to fire on retreating soldiers. But there was no other way, at that point. If Stalingrad would've fallen, that would greatly demoralize an entire Red Army, and cause an even greater loss of life. But by no means were soldiers thrown into battle, half-armed into their certain death. That would just be pointless, even for ruthless Russian Generals. Plus when they showed Kruschev commanding the front, I fell off my seat laughing. I can go on and on, and this would be a never-ending story, except that I don't want it to be as boring and as never-ending as the script for Enemy at the gates. Advice for people who like a little reality in their movies, don't see it. It sucks. I try to picture Private Ryan done by the same director. It just wouldn't be Private Ryan, but some stupid unrealistic war flick, sort of like U-571.
    8geopat2004

    Tense war drama that centers the viewer in the German invasion of Stalingrad

    I simply want to weigh in with a very positive response to Enemy at the Gates. Taken as a historical drama rather than an attempt to flawlessly depict an historical incident, this is topnotch entertainment. "Enemy" portrays the conflict between a young Russian sniper played by Law and the German sniper (Harris) who is sent to kill him during the German attack on Stalingrad during WWII. Apart from a scene which awkwardly caricatures the Russian field commanders and the occasionally distracting accents, the film successfully immerses the viewer in this tense war drama. Appreciate it it for its tight focus, uncompromising realism, and fine characterizations by the main actors. Research the historical accuracy later, if you must, but don't let it spoil the film.

    Más como esto

    La caída del halcón negro
    7.7
    La caída del halcón negro
    Fuímos heroes
    7.2
    Fuímos heroes
    La delgada línea roja
    7.6
    La delgada línea roja
    Operación Valquiria
    7.1
    Operación Valquiria
    Cartas desde Iwo Jima
    7.8
    Cartas desde Iwo Jima
    Capitán de mar y guerra: La costa más lejana del mundo
    7.5
    Capitán de mar y guerra: La costa más lejana del mundo
    El patriota
    7.2
    El patriota
    La conquista del honor
    7.1
    La conquista del honor
    Pearl Harbor
    6.3
    Pearl Harbor
    Enemy at the Gate
    7.4
    Enemy at the Gate
    Stalingrad
    7.5
    Stalingrad
    El último de los mohicanos
    7.6
    El último de los mohicanos

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      Jude Law and Ed Harris were cast largely on the expressiveness of their eyes. They were frequently called to convey emotion without saying a word.
    • Errores
      In the scene where Vassili is lighting the cigarette butt he picked up from the German sniper, it's apparent by the flame he uses a butane lighter. Butane lighters were not invented until the 1950's.
    • Citas

      Commisar Danilov: I've been such a fool, Vassili. Man will always be a man. There is no new man. We tried so hard to create a society that was equal, where there'd be nothing to envy your neighbour. But there's always something to envy. A smile, a friendship, something you don't have and want to appropriate. In this world, even a Soviet one, there will always be rich and poor. Rich in gifts, poor in gifts. Rich in love, poor in love.

    • Créditos curiosos
      The end credits are slanted and curved.
    • Conexiones
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: The Mexican/Enemy at the Gates/See Spot Run/The Taste of Others/Series 7 (2001)
    • Bandas sonoras
      La Chanson des Artilleurs
      Music by Tikhon Khrennikov

      Lyrics by Viktor Gusev

      (C) Musikvertag Hans Sikorski, Hamburg

      Performed by The Red Army Choir (as Les Choers De L'Armee Rouge)

      Courtesy of 7 Productions, Paris

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes22

    • How long is Enemy at the Gates?Con tecnología de Alexa
    • Is this film historically accurate?
    • We are used to seeing long distance shootings in films about snipers, and Enemy At The Gates is no exception. But Stalingrad was a dense ruin. How did sniper battles really work there?
    • What is the significance of the two crosses/ribbons Ed Harris' character changes nearing the end of the film?

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 11 de mayo de 2001 (México)
    • Países de origen
      • Francia
      • Alemania
      • Reino Unido
      • Irlanda
      • Estados Unidos
    • Sitios oficiales
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site
    • Idiomas
      • Inglés
      • Alemán
      • Ruso
    • También se conoce como
      • Enemy at the Gates
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Bavaria, Alemania
    • Productoras
      • Paramount Pictures
      • Mandalay Pictures
      • KC Medien
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • USD 68,000,000 (estimado)
    • Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 51,401,758
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 13,810,266
      • 18 mar 2001
    • Total a nivel mundial
      • USD 96,976,270
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      2 horas 11 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Respuestas de IMDb: ayuda a completar nuestros datos faltantes
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.