Hace un siglo, eventos catastróficos sumieron la Tierra en tinieblas, destruyendo la civilización. Los pocos sobrevivientes intentan cambiar los sucesos causantes.Hace un siglo, eventos catastróficos sumieron la Tierra en tinieblas, destruyendo la civilización. Los pocos sobrevivientes intentan cambiar los sucesos causantes.Hace un siglo, eventos catastróficos sumieron la Tierra en tinieblas, destruyendo la civilización. Los pocos sobrevivientes intentan cambiar los sucesos causantes.
Gloria Perez
- Dr. Michele Ang
- (as Gloria Mari)
Gregory Fawcett
- Hawks
- (as Greg Fawcett)
William Frederick Knight
- Admiral Hayes
- (as William Knight)
Danny Parker-Lopes
- Bartender
- (as Danny Parker)
Brien DiRito
- Nautilis Lieutenant
- (as Brien Di Rito)
Frank Uzzolino
- New Jersey Hood
- (as Frank Uzzalino)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Being made in 2000 really surprised me actually, because it looks and has the same vibe as a film made in the early 90s, possibly sooner.
It reminded me very much of films that I used to watch with my Granddad from that time period too in terms of plot, the kind of "science" going on, the special effects, everything. Even the same kind of lines, some of them being cheesy. It's decent with how it uses the Sci-fi elements such as time travel, and has some nice touches here and there.
So when I thought it was made sooner than 2000, my rating would have been higher, but with a note it was a product of its time. But I guess since it isn't, it drops a little, but if you know anyone who likes films from that time period. Then it could be an enjoyable watch.
If you are expecting something more modern than what it offers, then you will be a little disappointed.
It reminded me very much of films that I used to watch with my Granddad from that time period too in terms of plot, the kind of "science" going on, the special effects, everything. Even the same kind of lines, some of them being cheesy. It's decent with how it uses the Sci-fi elements such as time travel, and has some nice touches here and there.
So when I thought it was made sooner than 2000, my rating would have been higher, but with a note it was a product of its time. But I guess since it isn't, it drops a little, but if you know anyone who likes films from that time period. Then it could be an enjoyable watch.
If you are expecting something more modern than what it offers, then you will be a little disappointed.
While Nautilus may not have had the budget of some of the larger Hollywood projects, they story, action, and acting of the main stars propels this above most attempts at Sci-Fi cinema released. While much of the attention centers around the martial arts prowess of Richard Norton, attention needs to be placed on the actor that portrayed Raoul, the leader of the Eco-terrorism group Equinox. Now known as the host for popular shows such as Shop till you Drop and Outback Jack, Roberto shines in his role here as a man with a mission to save the planet. Showing acerbic wit and physical dexterity, his screen time was a highlight of this film.
Action, Explosions, Intrigue, Time Travel, Martial Arts, what more could a movie buff ask for?
Action, Explosions, Intrigue, Time Travel, Martial Arts, what more could a movie buff ask for?
Made for very little money, NAUTILUS is actually a fun science-fiction film combining elements from 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA, CRACK IN THE WORLD and DIE HARD. On the level of a Roger Corman styled flick, the film has impressive productions values and some very nice miniature work. Richard Norton of the Jackie Chan films is a good, athletic hero and as a middle of the week video rental, this flick delivers the goods in an unpretentious way.
The Cover for the DVD shows a very impressive Submarine. Unfortunately, the sub in the movie is a very different and extremely inferior sub, nothing like the cover picture. Even though this is a sub movie, 98% of the action take place between humans far from the sub. No Monsters, No Fantasy Elements, just mid 90's direct to video really bad action, with less than stellar players. If this movie had just added some good CGI stuff, it would have been much better. This movie has an ecological message to it, and while important, always brings a movie down. And of course, even though the name of the movie is Nautilus and is about a sub, there is zero connection between it, and the writings of Jules Verne. (What we need are some direct to video/DVD Captain Nemo movies that hold no relation to the books, other than the character and his sub, fighting lots of monsters and stuff.) This movie was less than stellar, but I did manage to make it all the through with out turning it off. The actors failed, but the story did make me want to see how it ended.
Nautilus is, without a doubt, going to be seen in the very near future on MST3K. Definitely one of the worst movies ever made. IF you can stay awake throughout the entire movie, you will be treated to the worst acting, the worst directing, the worst cast and the worst dialogue to come out of, wherever, in a long, long time. Give yourself a treat...Go see Planet of the Apes for the tenth time, rather than waste your time and money on this dribble.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe submarine is a modified fuselage from a F-16 model kit.
- ConexionesEdited from Time Under Fire (1997)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Nautilus?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 37 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta