Del crepúsculo al amanecer 2: Texas sangriento
Título original: From Dusk Till Dawn 2: Texas Blood Money
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.2/10
18 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaFive career criminals gather in Mexico to pull off a bank heist. They soon realize that they are up against far more frightening creatures than the police pursuing them.Five career criminals gather in Mexico to pull off a bank heist. They soon realize that they are up against far more frightening creatures than the police pursuing them.Five career criminals gather in Mexico to pull off a bank heist. They soon realize that they are up against far more frightening creatures than the police pursuing them.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Stacie Randall
- Marcy
- (as Stacie Bourgeois)
Tiffani Thiessen
- Pam
- (as Tiffani-Amber Thiessen)
Opiniones destacadas
The sequel to the first film From Dusk Till Dawn (1996) in which I am a huge fan. The first cult film is my favorite action vampire horror film. This sequel is an okay DTV movie bloody horror slasher film and I don't understand why this movie gets the hate for it but Part 3 The Hangman's Daughter get's better ratings. From Dusk Till Dawn 2: Texas Blood Money is not near good as the first one, it is still a good horror movie in his own way, with excellent cast, diffrent story and a good FX effects, different ideas, it does have a good kills. It is underrated and unappreciated slaher horror sequel.
"Time to come with us, Buck, the bite ain't that bad. Bite my ass."
This film it self suffers from mayor problem issues it is not as good as the first one. It is a step down from the first movie. The problems with the film I have is: The film heavily borrows things from the first movie. This guy Luther Heggs (Duane Whitaker) stops by Titty Twister bar in Mexico open in which in the first movie finale it was burned down. So how was Titty Twister bar open so fast in short time. Danny Trejo is again as barman Razor Charlie and he acts the same as he did in the first movie. Razor Charlie was killed in the first movie so what does he doing in here. He brings a vampire and asks his fellow if that was the guy that shot him. That was all in the first movie. The dialogues could have been better. We could got at least good sexy girl in this movie but there was no good actress in here. The pacing in this movie is slow and the movie could have been better. Is this movie a sequel or prequel to the first movie or what. To me the plot is confusing, with plot holes and why vampires are robbing a bank and stealing the money. This movie has not any good soundtracks like the first movie had. Where did Danny Trejo disappeared what happened to him, it was not explaind. Those are main problems and isues I have with this film.
Here is what the movie works for me: you have an excellent cast Robert Patrick from Terminator 2: Judgment Day he played T-1000, from The X-Files he played FBI Special Agent John Doggett he was in other movies like Zero Tolerance, Decoy, Hong Kong '97 and other action movies. I like the guy, I am huge Robert Patrick fan. He did a terrific job in The X-Files in Season 8 I love that he is the lead guy in here and he is the hero. Robert did an excellent performence he is a likable guy and he is different from Seth Gecko. Buck Bowers is not a stone cold killer like was George Clooney, he is an ex convict and a bank robber but not a killer, he did not kill anyone so yes i like his character.
I love the first one to death, it is my favorite action film I like this one. The other actors are: Bo Hopkins as Texas Ranger Otis Lawson he did a fine job been the good guy I love his character. Kudos too Bo Hopkins. Muse Watson from Prison Break Season 1 and I Know What You Did Last Summer, he did a good job I like him. Raymond Cruz is a bad-ass as Jesus. The guy is really underrated actor he is in all kind of movies: Under Siege, Broken Arrow, The Rock and so on. I love the action sequence in which Jesus slashes a vampire woman's head off and he jums out of a window excellent stunt. Than we have Tiffani-Amber Thiessen from Beverly Hills 90210 and Bruce Campbell from The Evil Dead trilogy in here in a cameo opening scene. There is this guy I never heard of James Parks son of Michael Parks who playas Deputy Edgar McGraw son of Earl McGraw that Gecko brothers in the first movie shot his father dead in the first movie.
Good acting and direction by Scott Spiegel he did a good job directing this sequel from Dimension. Okay music theme from Joseph Stanley Williams but not better than Graeme Revell's music from the first film. You have some good kills, a nice action. 4 Vampiers are shooting with machine guns on SWAT Team and kills them all. You have explosins practical effects done for real. You have a wonderful finale in which a face-off between the survivors and the vampires takes place. Buck, Otis and Edgar confront 4 vampires and they fight for their survival in which it is a bad-ass. I love happy ending, wonderful finale. This is an okay stand alone action horror movie with a twist, not near good as the first movie that I love to death but okay. Quentin Tarantino was excutive producer of this movie would really like to see the TV series of the first movie.
"Time to come with us, Buck, the bite ain't that bad. Bite my ass."
This film it self suffers from mayor problem issues it is not as good as the first one. It is a step down from the first movie. The problems with the film I have is: The film heavily borrows things from the first movie. This guy Luther Heggs (Duane Whitaker) stops by Titty Twister bar in Mexico open in which in the first movie finale it was burned down. So how was Titty Twister bar open so fast in short time. Danny Trejo is again as barman Razor Charlie and he acts the same as he did in the first movie. Razor Charlie was killed in the first movie so what does he doing in here. He brings a vampire and asks his fellow if that was the guy that shot him. That was all in the first movie. The dialogues could have been better. We could got at least good sexy girl in this movie but there was no good actress in here. The pacing in this movie is slow and the movie could have been better. Is this movie a sequel or prequel to the first movie or what. To me the plot is confusing, with plot holes and why vampires are robbing a bank and stealing the money. This movie has not any good soundtracks like the first movie had. Where did Danny Trejo disappeared what happened to him, it was not explaind. Those are main problems and isues I have with this film.
Here is what the movie works for me: you have an excellent cast Robert Patrick from Terminator 2: Judgment Day he played T-1000, from The X-Files he played FBI Special Agent John Doggett he was in other movies like Zero Tolerance, Decoy, Hong Kong '97 and other action movies. I like the guy, I am huge Robert Patrick fan. He did a terrific job in The X-Files in Season 8 I love that he is the lead guy in here and he is the hero. Robert did an excellent performence he is a likable guy and he is different from Seth Gecko. Buck Bowers is not a stone cold killer like was George Clooney, he is an ex convict and a bank robber but not a killer, he did not kill anyone so yes i like his character.
I love the first one to death, it is my favorite action film I like this one. The other actors are: Bo Hopkins as Texas Ranger Otis Lawson he did a fine job been the good guy I love his character. Kudos too Bo Hopkins. Muse Watson from Prison Break Season 1 and I Know What You Did Last Summer, he did a good job I like him. Raymond Cruz is a bad-ass as Jesus. The guy is really underrated actor he is in all kind of movies: Under Siege, Broken Arrow, The Rock and so on. I love the action sequence in which Jesus slashes a vampire woman's head off and he jums out of a window excellent stunt. Than we have Tiffani-Amber Thiessen from Beverly Hills 90210 and Bruce Campbell from The Evil Dead trilogy in here in a cameo opening scene. There is this guy I never heard of James Parks son of Michael Parks who playas Deputy Edgar McGraw son of Earl McGraw that Gecko brothers in the first movie shot his father dead in the first movie.
Good acting and direction by Scott Spiegel he did a good job directing this sequel from Dimension. Okay music theme from Joseph Stanley Williams but not better than Graeme Revell's music from the first film. You have some good kills, a nice action. 4 Vampiers are shooting with machine guns on SWAT Team and kills them all. You have explosins practical effects done for real. You have a wonderful finale in which a face-off between the survivors and the vampires takes place. Buck, Otis and Edgar confront 4 vampires and they fight for their survival in which it is a bad-ass. I love happy ending, wonderful finale. This is an okay stand alone action horror movie with a twist, not near good as the first movie that I love to death but okay. Quentin Tarantino was excutive producer of this movie would really like to see the TV series of the first movie.
It goes the genre-blending of the original one better: it melds the heist movie, the vampire movie, and the good-ole-boy movie. The co-writer Duane Whitaker, who has made a number of witty and flavorfully scripted independent movies, is probably responsible for the Texas atmosphere, and the idiosyncracy of the gang of redneck layabouts who make up the cast. Despite the stripped-down special effects, you might feel grateful to the movie for being the first B picture in eons to feature actual characters. Robert Patrick is superb as the hero--who, in the fashion of the first film, seems convincingly about to be revealed as a hotheaded sociopath, then veers in a very different direction. Muse Watson as the safecracker C.W. and Bo Svenson, now ripened in late middle aged, is marvellous as the skeptical sheriff--he could play doubles with L.Q. Jones. The movie isn't much, but it has actors, characters and dialogue--three things that are by now extinct on the direct-to-video shelf.
I only caught the "edited" version on Sci-Fi Channel, but must admit that I found this to be a mildly entertaining film. It takes a basic ideas (vampires robbing a bank) and goes with it and runs.
The problem is that that's really all there is, and there's not much running track. Like the original, it tries to stay "reality" grounded as a caper flick, but given this is a shorter movie, this goes on _way_ too long before you actually get to vampires.
Once we get the first guy bit by a vampire, it moves along to "vampires rob a bank" and "vampires shoot it out with police." But...that's really about it. The writers seemed to have run out of ideas, and so we just get interminable variations on these two basic ideas. There is no real climax - the vampire bad guys are subsequently interchangeable, and the only really competent one (Jesus) gets killed before the formerly-dimwitted one. The ending is just one big shootout, prolonged by a convenient solar eclipse. Which is another pointless plot point - if you want vampires to be in the darkness, just keep them in darkness and have the sun come up normally. Adding the solar eclipse does nothing here. It's stuff like this which suggests the writers didn't know quite what they were doing.
As for the Raimi-esque POV shots, a little goes a long way - something that Scott Spiegel should have learned from the master. It's kinda fun the first twenty times, but after that...
Overall, I'd recommend it if you can catch it on the cheap. It's no classic, but it's mildly amusing.
The problem is that that's really all there is, and there's not much running track. Like the original, it tries to stay "reality" grounded as a caper flick, but given this is a shorter movie, this goes on _way_ too long before you actually get to vampires.
Once we get the first guy bit by a vampire, it moves along to "vampires rob a bank" and "vampires shoot it out with police." But...that's really about it. The writers seemed to have run out of ideas, and so we just get interminable variations on these two basic ideas. There is no real climax - the vampire bad guys are subsequently interchangeable, and the only really competent one (Jesus) gets killed before the formerly-dimwitted one. The ending is just one big shootout, prolonged by a convenient solar eclipse. Which is another pointless plot point - if you want vampires to be in the darkness, just keep them in darkness and have the sun come up normally. Adding the solar eclipse does nothing here. It's stuff like this which suggests the writers didn't know quite what they were doing.
As for the Raimi-esque POV shots, a little goes a long way - something that Scott Spiegel should have learned from the master. It's kinda fun the first twenty times, but after that...
Overall, I'd recommend it if you can catch it on the cheap. It's no classic, but it's mildly amusing.
OK. This is probably my guiltiest pleasure ever! The acting is extremely awful, and the movie is filled with immature draggings of the originals material. But still I like this movie. A cinescape reviewer wrote that some horror fans desperate for something new in the genre, may forgive the film for its problems. I think I'm probably one of those horror fans.
Its more entertaining than a lot of recent theatrical releases. I think the gore is great, and the Evil Dead qualities: Sam Raimi-ish camera angles (overdone), demon-like vampire deaths make this movie even more entertaining. I think its really a great cheeseball B-horror movie.
Its more entertaining than a lot of recent theatrical releases. I think the gore is great, and the Evil Dead qualities: Sam Raimi-ish camera angles (overdone), demon-like vampire deaths make this movie even more entertaining. I think its really a great cheeseball B-horror movie.
After hearing countless people tell me how crappy this movie is, and after reading tons of reviews that make it sound totally unbearable, I decided to watch it myself. You know what? They are all wrong. Most of the movie is at LEAST average direct-to-video work. Of course it isn't as good as the original, but this movie was just as gory, more action-packed, and had some very funny moments (they watched Mexican porno for a VERY long time in that motel room). I was not disappointed watching this movie, because I didn't take it seriously. I suggest you relax and give it a try, you'll laugh at how funny they tried to make this a good movie.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDanny Trejo is the only person to appear in all three From Dusk Till Dawn films.
- ErroresThe inopportune solar eclipse takes place after a night with a full moon. This is impossible; during a solar eclipse, the moon is between the earth and the sun, in a new moon phase.
- Versiones alternativasFinnish video version is cut by 1 minute 35 seconds.
- ConexionesFeatured in 78/52 (2017)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- From Dusk Till Dawn 2: Texas Blood Money
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 5,000,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 6,374
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 28 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta