Zire darakhatan zeyton

Reviewer's Note: The Iranian movie Zire darakhatan zeyton (1994) was shown in the U.S. with the title Through the Olive Trees. The film was written and directed by Abbas Kiarostami.

The movie is the third of a series of films entitled "The Koker Trilogy." Koker is a small village 200 miles northwest of Tehran. No one outside Iran would know anything about Koker, except for Kiarostami's films. He used Koker as the setting for the first film in the trilogy-Where is the Friend's House? (1987). (This is an amazing movie, with an IMDb rating of 8.1.) However, Koker was still just an obscure village.

Koker is now famous because of a horrible tragedy that took place in the region on June 21, 1990. A devastating earthquake destroyed Koker and many surrounding villages. The loss of life was immense--about 50,000 people died, including 20,000 children. Almost all the buildings were destroyed. Kiarostami directed two more films about Koker. Now, the location is well known to Iranians and cinephiles.

In real life, director Kiarostami and his son traveled to Koker five days after the earthquake occurred. They wanted to find out if the two brothers who starred in the first film had survived the earthquake. Kiarostami turned his trip into a movie. That film was And Life Goes On (1992). He found that despite the immense grief felt by the local people, life did, indeed, go on.

Through the Olive Trees stars Mohamad Ali Keshavarz as The Film Director. He's the only professional actor in any of the three movies. As is usual for Kiarostami, the other actors are local amateurs. Farhad Kheradmand plays Farhad. He was also in And Life Goes On. Zarifeh Shiva portrays Mrs. Shiva, who is the director's assistant.

In this film, Kiarostami has made a movie about making a movie. The movie they are making is And Life Goes On. There's no shortage of movies about making movies. However, I've never seen a movie about making a movie that already exists. It's a brilliant concept, because we can recognize segments of And Life Goes On as they appear in Through the Olive Trees.

However, Through the Olive Trees is really about the relationship of two young people. Hossein Rezai portrays Hossein, who had a four-minute, but important, segment in And Life Goes On. In that segment, he tells us that he and his wife were married the day after the earthquake. They were engaged, the wedding had been planned, and they went ahead with it. This demonstrated a key element of And Life Goes On--the couple embodied the human desire to pick up the pieces and move forward with life, and with replacing death with new life.

In this movie, we learn that Hossain has fallen in love with the woman who played the young wife--Tahereh. However, Tahereh (portrayed by Tahereh Ladanian) apparently wants nothing to do with Hossain. Tahereh lost both of her parents in the earthquake, so she now lives with her grandmother. Her grandmother absolutely rejects Hossain because he's illiterate and doesn't own a house. That makes sense, except that Hossain is intelligent and ambitious, and truly loves the young woman.

So, what we have is a plot within a movie about making a movie. It sounds confusing, but it works.

Kiarostami is famous for using panoramic long shots, and this is what we see at the end of the film. The closing long shot is amazing and unforgettable, but ambiguous.

This is an amazing movie. It has an extremely high IMDb rating of 7.8. I rated it 10. It worked well enough on the small screen, but of course it would be better in a theater. We saw it on a Criterion DVD, sold with the other two movies in the trilogy. The films may be available separately, which would be OK. However, the Criterion edition has many video extras, along with a written essay by noted film critic Godfrey Cheshire.

I would say that the three trilogy movies are all must-see films if you love great international cinema. Find them and watch them.

IMPORTANT: The trilogy should be seen in order of production: Where is the Friend's House? then, And Life Goes On, then, Through the Olive Trees. The movies will each work separately, but they won't work as well if seen out of that order.

Found this film to easily engage my heart without burdening my head with too much technique. Funny, sad, the two sides of the ever encompassing cinema coin. An seemingly effortless exploration of the relationships of men and women, tradition and experience, the old and the somewhat new. And what a beautiful rhythmic last sequence, one of the best of all my moviegoing history.

First thing: this is the third part in a trilogy. You really need to see "Where is the Friend's House" & "And Life Goes On" first if you want to fully understand this. In short, this is a film about a man making a film of his own journey in search of actors in a film he made earlier. Once you know that, it's not in the least slow or simple, it's a hall of mirrors, as another commentator put it. Frames within frames within frames.

Second thing: Jean-Luc Godard praised Kiarostami's early films, but then felt he'd become too influenced by the international art movie tradition. I don't know if this is a film he liked or disliked, but it sure has a lot of Godard's influence in it - from the director interviewing sundry characters through the conflation of documentary and fiction elements to the use of music, it's like Godard crossed with Satyajit Ray. Not that that's a bad thing.

I don't know if Kiarostami is as original or as striking as some maintain - in many ways this is "Day for Night" transplanted to the Iranian countryside - but it's very watchable, often very funny and the landscape is beautiful.

There also seems to be (in the Iranian context) a subversive subtext to these films. Tradition is held up as hidebound and stupid (the adults in "Where is the Friend's House", the grandmother in this film) while the young are seen improvising their own lives and creating hope in the face of catastrophe. I can't imagine that's too popular with the mullahs, and indeed it seems that Kiarostami has been unable to get a film released in Iran in a decade.

Well worth a view, and it may even inspire you to get out into the world with a digital video camera, but do see the other films (and probably also "Homework") first.

Through the Olive Trees is a great example of how neo-realistic techniques can show realism in film making. One personal criticism would be the music, but that is purely personal, and takes nothing away from the film. A masterpeice.

Following a film he made a few years backs, a director returns to the area where it was shot to try and find the actors who he used. The area has been hit by a large earthquake and the film is designed to help the area as well as follow up on the people. Among the cast is a young man, Hossein, who has fallen for one of the other actors and seeks to marry her – but her grandmother refuses to consider any such offer; ironic perhaps, considering Hossein's character in the film is married to the very girl he loves in real life.

While making the sequel (or follow up) to "Where is the friend's house?" Abbas Kiarostami met a man who told him that he was married 5 days after the devastating earthquake (50,000 dead) that is the foundation for that film. A few years later Kiarostami decided to use this man and his story as the basis for this rather intriguing film within a film. The dual plots are interesting and work well in contrast to one another to fill out a plot that is not the easiest to get excited about or really engaged by. In this regard many viewers may feel bored or distant from the material as it doesn't quite build a story that well. The "film within a film" concept is interesting but it produces many scenes that are replayed over and over (different takes) without the repeats adding a great deal – in fact they seem to take away from the rhythm of the film more than give to it. As with other Kiarostami films, it is slow and requires work, but even if you are willing to put yourself into it, it is still not easy work.

The characters and place are interesting and it does feel like these are over and above the material itself. The film will be of greater interest to those who have seen the other films in the trilogy as the places and people have history to them, but they are still well enough done to avoid it being key to the film. The cast do pretty well throughout; Rezai steals the show with a good performance; Ladanian is totally absent and her performance will be hard (was hard!) for a Western audience to appreciate. Keshavarz does pretty well in the role of the director.

Overall this is not a film to come to unless you have seen at least one of the other two films (ideally both. It is watchable without this knowledge but even with it, it is hard work at times. The narrative is slow and not that important apparently and, although the characters and places are interesting, I did struggle to really get emotionally involved in the film. Interesting enough to be worth a look but don't expect too much from it.