Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA woman undergoes hypnosis to determine who murdered her husband, a crime for which she is the chief suspect.A woman undergoes hypnosis to determine who murdered her husband, a crime for which she is the chief suspect.A woman undergoes hypnosis to determine who murdered her husband, a crime for which she is the chief suspect.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Mary-Louise Parker
- Caroline Walker
- (as Mary Louise Parker)
Anne DeSalvo
- Flustered Attorney
- (as Anne De Salvo)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
A thoroughly realistic interpretation of how Hypnosis can be really done. The plots (which I am not going to spoil by detailing here) are well worth watching the whole movie for. I saw this movie on cable one night by accident and bought it on VHS shortly afterwards as I was impressed by it. Any hypnosis fanatics out there MUST SEE this movie. Without a doubt it is the best around.
The plot of this movie is as dumb as a bag of hair. Jimmy Smit plays a character that could have been upset by the ridiculousness of the story. He is evil and a wife beater. It's a character as far from his NYPD and LA Law roles as you could possibly get.
If you've thought he had the looks and the acting chops to play the really bad boy role, her's your present.
But!!!!!!!! Mary Louis Parker wears black miniskirts and little black minidresses throughout the movie.
She has always had some of the greatest legs in the history of the movies. This makes the movie well worth it for this leg admirer.
I'd buy the DVD for this reason only if it was available.
If you've thought he had the looks and the acting chops to play the really bad boy role, her's your present.
But!!!!!!!! Mary Louis Parker wears black miniskirts and little black minidresses throughout the movie.
She has always had some of the greatest legs in the history of the movies. This makes the movie well worth it for this leg admirer.
I'd buy the DVD for this reason only if it was available.
I caught this one on cable and I was very surprised. Steady direction and some good performances accent a twisty and very engaging story. This one will keep you up all night thinking about what was real and what wasn't. Check out Jason Scott Lee in the Lou Diamond Phillips role!
If this film is an accurate display of J. Smits acting skills, I think he made a big mistake leaving television. Hasn't he watched any films "starring" David Caruso, especially "Cold Around the Heart"? Along the lines of acting ability, what about Mary-Louise, she has done much, much better. Yes, it is a terrible script, ineptly edited, and totally lacking in continuity, but skilled actors can and have overcome similar obstacles. A very big disappointment.
Confused murder suspect cannot remember if she murdered her rich husband.
Against the better judgment of hard-bitten "throw the book at her and save tax-payers' money" type police department, smooth psychologist/hypnotist (Nigel Hawthorne) helps her to relive the night of the murder by means of regression into her past.
However, as she relives life with her husband she begins to notice that lots of details don't quite match her memories. What really happened?
This is NOT a fantastic film, I wouldn't pay money to see it in a cinema, for example. The depiction of hypnosis is bizarre enough to initially seem quite funny.
Once you get over that rather shaky plot device though, the various layers of reality brought up by the hypnosis are quite interesting in a "what is reality?" way. It reminded me the teensiest little bit of "Memento" and even though it was late at night I ignored the film's more pretentious angles and sat through the entire thing. Mainly to see why the memory discrepancies occurred and so on.
The lighting and photography are also quite nice.
Against the better judgment of hard-bitten "throw the book at her and save tax-payers' money" type police department, smooth psychologist/hypnotist (Nigel Hawthorne) helps her to relive the night of the murder by means of regression into her past.
However, as she relives life with her husband she begins to notice that lots of details don't quite match her memories. What really happened?
This is NOT a fantastic film, I wouldn't pay money to see it in a cinema, for example. The depiction of hypnosis is bizarre enough to initially seem quite funny.
Once you get over that rather shaky plot device though, the various layers of reality brought up by the hypnosis are quite interesting in a "what is reality?" way. It reminded me the teensiest little bit of "Memento" and even though it was late at night I ignored the film's more pretentious angles and sat through the entire thing. Mainly to see why the memory discrepancies occurred and so on.
The lighting and photography are also quite nice.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFilmed for a theatrical release but was released straight-to-video instead.
- ErroresIn most U.S. courts, testimony given while under hypnosis is not admissible as evidence; it is too easy for a subject under hypnosis to be influenced by the hypnotist. Hence, so-called "hypnotically-refreshed" testimony is considered unreliable in a court of law.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Mente asesina
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 4,500,000 (estimado)
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Murder in Mind (1997) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda