CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.2/10
553
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaIt's 2035, an international crew in cryogenic sleep embarks on a voyage to explore a nearby Earth-like planet. Awakening a century later, they discover something went terribly awry during th... Leer todoIt's 2035, an international crew in cryogenic sleep embarks on a voyage to explore a nearby Earth-like planet. Awakening a century later, they discover something went terribly awry during their journey through the cosmic vastness.It's 2035, an international crew in cryogenic sleep embarks on a voyage to explore a nearby Earth-like planet. Awakening a century later, they discover something went terribly awry during their journey through the cosmic vastness.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
First, you start with Agatha Christie's "Ten Little Indians." A crew is on a star ship and they start being killed off one by one. Add some cheap cliches to attempt to make the characters seem real, like giving the doctor a drug problem (Why is the one character who should be aware of the dangers of drug abuse and is acutely aware there is a limited supply for everyone on board the one who succumbs to it?). Put in the characters behaving by the numbers, saying things like, "We have a mission to uphold"). The movie is so obvious with its plot twists, you start hoping that it's just trying to throw you off, and you see something other than you are expecting. Not at all. In fact, the big surprise plot twist in the film's final act, as well as the "ironic" ending, aren't that surprising or shocking. You watch the movie, wondering what would have happened if they'd tried a little harder.
This is decent sci movie with familiar story lines but not much different from all the zombie, virus, and super heroes movies. It was yet another space crew on an extended journey story.
It was a bit long with aspects that could have been removed to improve the place but seem added to substitute for character interaction. The acting was decent and production typical for basic sci fi movie. Unlike some movies. it did not try to insult your intelligence with characters doing stupid things or ignoring basic science principles. It was more a character driven story with little action relying on special effects. If you like sci fi anthology shows. you should like this.
It was a bit long with aspects that could have been removed to improve the place but seem added to substitute for character interaction. The acting was decent and production typical for basic sci fi movie. Unlike some movies. it did not try to insult your intelligence with characters doing stupid things or ignoring basic science principles. It was more a character driven story with little action relying on special effects. If you like sci fi anthology shows. you should like this.
While it is not the best movie ever made, nor the best done, I think it's still an enjoyable movie. The acting, while a bit sheltered by medicore scripting, is superb. Ming Na does very well as the doctor, and Emma Samms and Brenda Bakke do quite well also. And of course, being the ever popular De Young fan, Cliff did very well, minus the bad accent. All in all, I would suggest this movie to most people, so long as you don't watch it with kids.
Wow, was THAT bad! Long, boring, drawn out scenes with no point, bad, melodramatic acting, and a musical score so annoying I wanted to stick a sharp object in my ears to get it to stop.. Why is it that only Emma Sams wears that ridiculous hat? Once you realize how stupid it looks you can't stop staring at it. This was just plain bad.
Diving into the B-movie pool is always risky. Sometimes you find a hidden gem of schlocky fun; other times, you wade into a pit of boredom. If the title didn't already give it away, Terminal Voyage falls squarely into the second category.
The most striking thing about this film is that it's barely 80 minutes long, yet it feels twice as long. The narrative is barely existent: a crew of eight, en route to a habitable Earth-like planet, wakes from cryosleep to find their commander has been dead for decades. If that wasn't bad enough, they also soon discover that Earth's governments resolved ecological collapse the only way they knew how: by nuking each other into oblivion. It's a premise that could have set the stage for a thought-provoking sci-fi drama, but for Terminal Voyage, it's where any intrigue ends.
From there, the film drags through repetitive scenes of the crew struggling to cope by talking endlessly, escaping into VR simulations, taking drugs, and even hanging themselves. Around this time, they also begin to grow suspicious about the circumstances of some deaths. There's no real reason for them to be paranoid, though, as each death is either an accident or suicide. However, the plot really insists on this paranoia angle in a flimsy attempt to manufacture tension,. Something that it also tries to capture by shamelessly ripping off scenes from Alien. Meanwhile, the characters have no apparent astronaut-like duties and show no real interest in their original mission, which is colonizing a new planet, I guess?
There are some familiar faces in the cast: Steven Bauer (Scarface), Brenda Bakke (Hot Shots! Part Deux), and Ming-Na Wen (Street Fighter, The Mandalorian). Even the supporting cast features actors you might vaguely recognize from 90s sci-fi TV. But despite the reasonably solid cast for such a low budget production, the weak script and poor direction leave them sleepwalking through their lines, and I'm pretty sure they knew full well that this material was beneath them.
The movie briefly stirs from its coma at the very end with a plot twist that thematically seems to tie into the VR scenes. But by that point, I couldn't care less about deciphering the film's message. I was just glad that it was over.
Terminal Voyage is nihilistic, joyless, derivative, and utterly dull. It's hard to find anything worth recommending here. If you want some low-budget sci-fi schlock you can actually have fun with, you're better off looking elsewhere.
The most striking thing about this film is that it's barely 80 minutes long, yet it feels twice as long. The narrative is barely existent: a crew of eight, en route to a habitable Earth-like planet, wakes from cryosleep to find their commander has been dead for decades. If that wasn't bad enough, they also soon discover that Earth's governments resolved ecological collapse the only way they knew how: by nuking each other into oblivion. It's a premise that could have set the stage for a thought-provoking sci-fi drama, but for Terminal Voyage, it's where any intrigue ends.
From there, the film drags through repetitive scenes of the crew struggling to cope by talking endlessly, escaping into VR simulations, taking drugs, and even hanging themselves. Around this time, they also begin to grow suspicious about the circumstances of some deaths. There's no real reason for them to be paranoid, though, as each death is either an accident or suicide. However, the plot really insists on this paranoia angle in a flimsy attempt to manufacture tension,. Something that it also tries to capture by shamelessly ripping off scenes from Alien. Meanwhile, the characters have no apparent astronaut-like duties and show no real interest in their original mission, which is colonizing a new planet, I guess?
There are some familiar faces in the cast: Steven Bauer (Scarface), Brenda Bakke (Hot Shots! Part Deux), and Ming-Na Wen (Street Fighter, The Mandalorian). Even the supporting cast features actors you might vaguely recognize from 90s sci-fi TV. But despite the reasonably solid cast for such a low budget production, the weak script and poor direction leave them sleepwalking through their lines, and I'm pretty sure they knew full well that this material was beneath them.
The movie briefly stirs from its coma at the very end with a plot twist that thematically seems to tie into the VR scenes. But by that point, I couldn't care less about deciphering the film's message. I was just glad that it was over.
Terminal Voyage is nihilistic, joyless, derivative, and utterly dull. It's hard to find anything worth recommending here. If you want some low-budget sci-fi schlock you can actually have fun with, you're better off looking elsewhere.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe entry code for the confidential computer files is 3263827, the same number as the garbage masher in La guerra de las galaxias (1977).
- ErroresIn the opening sequence, as the camera approaches the room with the cryogenic chambers, an automatic door slides open. All of the crew is in their chambers. No need for that door to open.
- ConexionesEdited from Batalla más allá de las galaxias (1980)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Terminal Voyage?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 19 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Viaje sin retorno (1995) officially released in India in English?
Responda