[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?

  • Película de TV
  • 1991
  • 1h 33min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.7/10
1 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Vanessa Redgrave and Lynn Redgrave in What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1991)
DramaThriller

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaAn elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.

  • Dirección
    • David Greene
  • Guionistas
    • Henry Farrell
    • Brian Taggert
  • Elenco
    • Vanessa Redgrave
    • Lynn Redgrave
    • Bruce A. Young
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    5.7/10
    1 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • David Greene
    • Guionistas
      • Henry Farrell
      • Brian Taggert
    • Elenco
      • Vanessa Redgrave
      • Lynn Redgrave
      • Bruce A. Young
    • 26Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 1Opinión de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Fotos34

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 28
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal21

    Editar
    Vanessa Redgrave
    Vanessa Redgrave
    • Blanche Hudson
    Lynn Redgrave
    Lynn Redgrave
    • Jane Hudson
    Bruce A. Young
    Bruce A. Young
    • Dominick
    Amy Steel
    Amy Steel
    • Connie Trotter
    John Scott Clough
    John Scott Clough
    • Frank
    John Glover
    John Glover
    • Billy Korn
    Samantha Ryan
    Samantha Ryan
    • Baby Jane
    • (as Samantha Jordon)
    Erinn Canavan
    • Blanche at 9
    J. Michael Flynn
    J. Michael Flynn
    • Mr. Hudson
    Alexandra Johnson
    • Cora
    Bradley Mott
    • Luther
    Vinny Argiro
    • Abe
    Pat Skipper
    Pat Skipper
    • Director
    Barry Dennen
    Barry Dennen
    • Stage Manager
    Beans Morocco
    • Drag Queen
    Scotch Byerley
    • Ice Cream Man
    Tari Tabakin
    • Bank Teller
    Art Chudabala
    Art Chudabala
    • Usher
    • Dirección
      • David Greene
    • Guionistas
      • Henry Farrell
      • Brian Taggert
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios26

    5.71K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    TelevisionJunkie

    Interesting. . .but unsatisfying

    My philosophy on remakes is if you can't outdo the original, why bother? Although there are several remakes that I like, this is one of those "why bother" films. Don't get me wrong, the cast did a decent job with what they had to work with, and it was interesting to see the characters moved into the ‘90s, but where the original had a little too much backstory this version didn't have enough. But allowing time for commercials took away from the story, leaving this version nearly an hour short of the original. It was interesting to see the characters moved into a world with video stores, prostitutes, and drag queens -- which may be the only saving grace for the remake.

    I saw this version when it premiered, but didn't yet know the original, thus I didn't care for it that much. Seeing it again over 10 years later, now that I've seen the Davis/Crawford version, it made me like this one slightly better, but only slightly. The original is deservedly a classic, and the behind-the-scenes story is just as, if not more, interesting as the movie itself. When it comes to this version, there were no behind-the-scenes battles, being as the leads are real-life sisters.

    At the beginning of this version, the Redgrave sisters seem to be more friendly towards one another than Davis and Crawford were at any point of the original, but it still works. Lynn does a descent job as over-the-top Baby Jane, but she only plays it over-the-top, unlike the schizophrenic portrayal that Davis gave. Vanessa, on the other hand, lacked the depth that Crawford had as Blanche, which made her seem less like a victim and more like she just can't act, particularly the closer it got to the end of the film. Case in point, the final scene. Where Crawford gave an honest, breathless confession on the beach, Vanessa Redgrave studders her way through the dialogue as if she's reading it from cue cards perched above her head. John Glover, taking over the Victor Buono role, did a good job with his part, though it was a little disconcerting seeing the character in drag (though Buono could have never pulled that off).

    At the very most, this version was interesting. ‘Nuff said.
    2raymarsh-51084

    FAILS BY COMPARISON. SET YOUR EXPRESSION TO "CRINGE"

    There is a great deal of pathos about the original movie with Davis and Crawford. It is difficult to determine exactly how you should feel about the remake. It is so superficial, suburban and character-deficit. The former child star character has the infantilism of Edina on Absolutely Fabulous, except she isn't funny. Just kind of dreary and pathetic.
    4sforrester-3

    Unnecessary

    Some films are such classics that remakes are doomed to failure before a word is spoken. This is one of them. In its favour, Lynn Redgrave seems to have enjoyed herself and her version of Jane was a lot less cruel than David's. Vanessa Redgrave seemed to be sleepwalking through the entire film. For me, trying to modernise it while also attempting to keep to the original film just didn't work. This is a picky point but the Redgrave sisters are very tall and watching Lynn trying to run about like a child was probably unintentionally hilarious. I'd say just watch the original.
    nathid

    Excellent!!!

    An excellent remake of the 1962 classic, with real life sisters Vanessa and Lynn Redgrave in the old Bette Davis and Joan Crawford roles.

    I am a big fan of the original film, and was pleasantly pleased when I watched the remake and it was a lot better than I thought it would be.

    Although based on the same story, the events in the two films are staged completely different, which was good because I can't stand a remake that is just a total rip-off of the first film.

    The basic story is as follows...

    Jane Hudson (Lynn Redgrave) is a former child star who was forgotten when her sister Blanche (Vanessa Redgrave) became famous and stole all of Jane's former success.

    Now middle-aged, the two sisters live together and Jane takes care of Blanche after a horrific accident leaves Blanche unable to walk. When a TV network starts to show a season of Blanche's old movies, Jane's forgotten jealousy returns, as she has always held her sister responsible for the loss of her career...

    I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. 4 stars.
    7Julius-10

    This film showcases the brilliant talents of both Vanessa and Lynn Redgrave.

    This film is a masterpiece! Vanessa and Lynn Redgrave show once again why they are both such successful actresses. This version of Baby Jane rivals if not surpasses the original with Joan Crawford and Bette Davis. Both actresses give astounding performances, and deserve the accolades of critics and the film industry for such a great movie. This film deserved better coverage and a wider audience.

    Más como esto

    Aunt Mary
    7.3
    Aunt Mary
    Hollywood Dreams & Nightmares: The Robert Englund Story
    7.6
    Hollywood Dreams & Nightmares: The Robert Englund Story
    Cálmate, dulce Carlota
    7.5
    Cálmate, dulce Carlota
    Camisa de fuerza
    6.8
    Camisa de fuerza
    ¿Qué pasó con Baby Jane?
    8.0
    ¿Qué pasó con Baby Jane?
    Los años dorados
    7.6
    Los años dorados
    Terror a bordo
    6.8
    Terror a bordo
    Whatever Happened to Baby Jane: Bette and Joan: Blind Ambition
    7.6
    Whatever Happened to Baby Jane: Bette and Joan: Blind Ambition
    The Surrender
    5.4
    The Surrender
    Muerte bajo el sol
    7.0
    Muerte bajo el sol
    RiffTrax Presents: Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?
    7.3
    RiffTrax Presents: Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?
    Historias de ultratumba
    6.4
    Historias de ultratumba

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      The film omits the segment in which Blanche is depicted as a full-fledged Hollywood star, as well as the accident sequence, which is discussed but not shown.
    • Conexiones
      Referenced in La niñera: The Yummy Mummy (1999)
    • Bandas sonoras
      Tomorrow Is Not Far Away
      Written by Lawrence E. Finegold

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 17 de febrero de 1991 (Estados Unidos)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • What Ever Happened to...?
    • Productoras
      • Steve White Productions
      • Aldrich Group
      • Spectacor Films
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 33 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Stereo
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.