Agrega una trama en tu idiomaFeaturing music instead of any dialogue and set in a near Kafkaesque future, this loose remake of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari follows a bureaucrat who mysterious Dr. Ramirez and his hideous ... Leer todoFeaturing music instead of any dialogue and set in a near Kafkaesque future, this loose remake of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari follows a bureaucrat who mysterious Dr. Ramirez and his hideous sidekick want as their latest victim.Featuring music instead of any dialogue and set in a near Kafkaesque future, this loose remake of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari follows a bureaucrat who mysterious Dr. Ramirez and his hideous sidekick want as their latest victim.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 nominaciones en total
Fotos
Opiniones destacadas
I saw this on PBS when it first aired. I was 25. I was prompted to watch it due to the tile, as I figured it must be a remake of The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari (another scary film). Lo and behold, it pretty much was.
13 years later, I have NEVER forgotten how scary this movie was. Every so often in passing have I seen in my mind the special effects that fill this film.
Halllucinatory, phantasmagoric images encompassed every single corner of the screen during much of the film. That chant scared the wits out of me as well - yet the totally silent scenes were that much worse. Kudos to everyone involved in the movie -- it has a long-lasting effect on the viewer, which cannot be said for too many movies.
I think that the images were provocative and came off the way schizophrenics may see the world -- non-stop slants, twists and unsure footings. For these, the camera angels were put to excellent use. Mikhail, Joan and Peter were all great. I could go on and on about this film, so I'll just keep it short, lest I get exhausted. I do hope that, if this ever plays again, that I will have heard about it because I'd love to get a copy of this. A truly disturbing experience. Highly recommended!
13 years later, I have NEVER forgotten how scary this movie was. Every so often in passing have I seen in my mind the special effects that fill this film.
Halllucinatory, phantasmagoric images encompassed every single corner of the screen during much of the film. That chant scared the wits out of me as well - yet the totally silent scenes were that much worse. Kudos to everyone involved in the movie -- it has a long-lasting effect on the viewer, which cannot be said for too many movies.
I think that the images were provocative and came off the way schizophrenics may see the world -- non-stop slants, twists and unsure footings. For these, the camera angels were put to excellent use. Mikhail, Joan and Peter were all great. I could go on and on about this film, so I'll just keep it short, lest I get exhausted. I do hope that, if this ever plays again, that I will have heard about it because I'd love to get a copy of this. A truly disturbing experience. Highly recommended!
10BladeMan
Any time this movie can be found it must be seen...drop everything you're doing and watch this well-acted/directed silent movie. Cusack is perfect for the part. The film has no hickups in direction, and flows to a perfect ending. I highly recommend it, though it's very very hard to find.
My review was written in May 1991 after a screening in the Directors Fortnight of the Cannes Film Festival.
Legit director Peter Sellars' debut film is a pretentious silent feature that resembles a student film out of control. Tedious, often cryptic effort was shot using the old Academy 1.33:1 aspect ratio, making it suitable for public tv.
Using static camera throughout, Sellars begins fairly coherently with morose stockbroker Peter Gallagher witnessing his black co-worker and roommate Gregory Wallace gorily murdered at work by a disgruntled old guy. In a separate incident straight out of "Wall Street", their boss is taken away by undercover agents in handcuffs.
Gallagher's estranged girlfriend Joan Cusack has a weird, traumatic encounter on the street with homeless derelict Mikhail Baryshnikov. She's soon having romantic nightmares about him that seem to come true, climaxing in her falling (apparently fatally) from a bridge.
Baryshnikov is under the power of another derelict, mysterious Ron Vawter, who looks like Italian star Gian Maria Volonte but has a snake-like scar down the middle of his face. Confusing later footage shows Baryshnikov apparently plummeting to his death (and possibly becoming re-animated by Vawter).
Coda resembles a stupid lift form "The Wizard of Oz', as major and minor characters (like cops and the undercover agents) reappear in dual roles at a clinic run by Vawter (sans scar). Baryshinkov and Cuasack's best friend Kate Valk are orderlies there; Cusack and Gallagher are patients.
Sellars finally turns off the music score for a boring 360-degree shot that ends the film on Gallagher, possibly implying that he imagined the whole thing.
Displaying little command of film technique, Sellars fails to organize his material in the rigorous fashion needed to convey information in a silent format. Confusing crosscutting in the middle reels destroys continuity and has scenes contradicting each other.
Though the static compositions are classical, occasional use of skip-frame, time-lapse editing within a shot disrupts the viewer's concentration. Using business card to make doggerel pronouncements (Wallace receives a "You have one day to live" message that comes true) is ridiculous.
John Adams' bombastic symphonic music is the dominant contrast throughout. It veers from the traditional romanticism of a Miklos Rozsa or Bronislau Kaper to the noisy lower-register blasts of John Corigliano's "Altered States" score whenever a horror scene is intended.
David Watkin's visuals are mainly mundane looking like a well-shot 16mm student short. Occasionally romantic tableaux of Cusack clash with the unflattering, no-makeup close-ups she gets.
Despite his top billing, Baryshnikov has little to do in an ill-conceived role that pays homage to the somnambulist of Wiene's classic. Gallagher, often on the phone and looking like he stepped off the set of "Sex, Lies and Videotape", does a decnet job when not encouraged to overact, but Cusack's silent hysteria holds no threat to the memory of classic divas.
David Lynch was listed as the pic's execuitve producer during production, but his name does not appear in the final credits.
Legit director Peter Sellars' debut film is a pretentious silent feature that resembles a student film out of control. Tedious, often cryptic effort was shot using the old Academy 1.33:1 aspect ratio, making it suitable for public tv.
Using static camera throughout, Sellars begins fairly coherently with morose stockbroker Peter Gallagher witnessing his black co-worker and roommate Gregory Wallace gorily murdered at work by a disgruntled old guy. In a separate incident straight out of "Wall Street", their boss is taken away by undercover agents in handcuffs.
Gallagher's estranged girlfriend Joan Cusack has a weird, traumatic encounter on the street with homeless derelict Mikhail Baryshnikov. She's soon having romantic nightmares about him that seem to come true, climaxing in her falling (apparently fatally) from a bridge.
Baryshnikov is under the power of another derelict, mysterious Ron Vawter, who looks like Italian star Gian Maria Volonte but has a snake-like scar down the middle of his face. Confusing later footage shows Baryshnikov apparently plummeting to his death (and possibly becoming re-animated by Vawter).
Coda resembles a stupid lift form "The Wizard of Oz', as major and minor characters (like cops and the undercover agents) reappear in dual roles at a clinic run by Vawter (sans scar). Baryshinkov and Cuasack's best friend Kate Valk are orderlies there; Cusack and Gallagher are patients.
Sellars finally turns off the music score for a boring 360-degree shot that ends the film on Gallagher, possibly implying that he imagined the whole thing.
Displaying little command of film technique, Sellars fails to organize his material in the rigorous fashion needed to convey information in a silent format. Confusing crosscutting in the middle reels destroys continuity and has scenes contradicting each other.
Though the static compositions are classical, occasional use of skip-frame, time-lapse editing within a shot disrupts the viewer's concentration. Using business card to make doggerel pronouncements (Wallace receives a "You have one day to live" message that comes true) is ridiculous.
John Adams' bombastic symphonic music is the dominant contrast throughout. It veers from the traditional romanticism of a Miklos Rozsa or Bronislau Kaper to the noisy lower-register blasts of John Corigliano's "Altered States" score whenever a horror scene is intended.
David Watkin's visuals are mainly mundane looking like a well-shot 16mm student short. Occasionally romantic tableaux of Cusack clash with the unflattering, no-makeup close-ups she gets.
Despite his top billing, Baryshnikov has little to do in an ill-conceived role that pays homage to the somnambulist of Wiene's classic. Gallagher, often on the phone and looking like he stepped off the set of "Sex, Lies and Videotape", does a decnet job when not encouraged to overact, but Cusack's silent hysteria holds no threat to the memory of classic divas.
David Lynch was listed as the pic's execuitve producer during production, but his name does not appear in the final credits.
10mrzonki
I've seen this film over 2 years ago, during Cameriimage festival in Lodz. As I know it was the only screening of this movie in Poland. It was the last film showed that day, at about 24, and I was bit exhausted after seeing 4 or 5 other films. Just after the beginning I've fallen asleep, I began to dream, and as I was opening my eyes from time to time, those very bizarre scenes - its strange, heavy tension and surrealistic content - of "Dr.Ramirez" started to mix up with my own fantasies. It was incredible, how powerful it was (it is!!)! The images from "The Cabinet" has got straight into me, into my own intimacy; and became a true element of my perceptual and - at the same time - imaginative, or better - purely visual, conscience. I must sincerely admit, that probably it is still the most influential screening I lived through my whole life! I recommend it to all of you!! See it and gave me a sign if you have a copy ( I'd like to experience it once again).
Peter Sellars, a genius who frequently looks back at theatre and opera texts of many centuries past, uses silent filmmaking as an abstract and emotive way of picturing the era just then departed--Reagan's 80s. RAMIREZ may be the most apt and accurate rendering of that time on film.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaLoosely based on the 1920 German surreal horror film classic El gabinete del Dr. Caligari (1920)
- ConexionesRemake of El gabinete del Dr. Caligari (1920)
- Bandas sonorasDie Harmonielehre
Composed by John Adams
Performed by San Francisco Symphony (as The San Francisco Symphony Orchestra)
Conducted by Edo de Waart
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- El gabinet del doctor Ramirez
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta