Opiniones de usuarios

I like a good low-budget "shocker" as good as the next guy, but unfortunately this one just isn't good.

The basic story - 2 thieves pull a jewel heist that goes bad. One guy ends up dead. Enter a freaky-ass chick who likes to f'ck dead people who offers to take the dead guy off his friends hands. She takes the corpse home and f'cks it (of course...). When he gets a little too "ripe" for her taste, she sells it to her gay friend who has AIDS so that he can have a "safe" partner (!!!). There's some other nonsensical bullsh!t that happens in between but that's pretty much it.

The story sounds pretty cool (for us sick bastards out there) but this one really doesn't deliver. The whole jewel heist story-line feels forced and silly, and the ending seems tacked on and pointless. The whole film feels like it was done in a weekend with a $6 budget. Not much to recommend here - only worth a look to say that you've seen it. I give it a generous 4/10 just for the fact that the concept is kinda ballsy.

Starts of immediately with in your face real footage of people being hanged or murdered or shot. So the real gore is there to find. It's interrupted by a girl watching it and starts to touch herself. The nudity goes further then in Gorgasmn (1990) because here the girl goes all the way. With close-ups of her pubic hair.

The score is like in Gorgasm, metal and industrial. Again it's shot on video with a lot of grain this time. But the acting is better, still not good of course.

When a robbery goes wrong Max swallows an expensive jewel but the cops arrive and Max is being shot. So it's up to Neill to take the body with him to get back the jewel. He comes across Carrie, a necrophiliac goth chick with pierced nipples, the one from the opening sequence. It's from there the sickness comes in and Nekromantik (1987) and Nekromantik 2 (1991) comes to mind but Nekromantik is still better. First Carrie has sex with the dead body before selling it to another AIDS victim. Pure sleaze and clearly not for everyone with all that footage shown and the live body piercing throughout this sick flick. And the jewel? You have to wait until the end...

Gore 1/5 Nudity 2/5 Effects 1/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5

I really enjoyed Hugh Gallager previous gore/erotic movie, Gorgasm (you can check my comment on IMDb for that one too) but this one was a little let down. Its a movie about a necrophhile chick, its quite explicit but its nothing compared to other low budget movie, Necromantick. If you want to check a good movie dealing with this subject, check Necromantick or Necromantick 2 (part 1 is better). There is very little blood and barely no gore here, so for the "gorotica" title you only have the erotica, because the lead show her tits a lots. The music is not great as it was on Gorgasm. So, If you want a good necrophilia themed movie, check Necromantick and if you want a good Gallager movie, check Gorgasm. A generous 4/10 for the effort in such a low budget.

I think this movie is great. They don't usually make movies like this nowadays. Extremely low budget and some of the acting is pretty bad, but why would you even expect the acting to be good in this kind of movie? The story is great though. Definitely in the vein of Nekromantik. A woman brings dead bodies to a gay guy with aids so that he can still have sex! Of course she has sex with the bodies first. Pretty sick stuff.

Shot entirely on video, this film does, at times, manage to make you forget that it may be one of the lowest budget films you may ever see. The standard of acting is unusually very high for a film destined for a relatively low audience.. ..in fact, go and rent/buy this film if you can - it deserves to be seen!