Un ejecutivo publicitario de gran éxito decide suspender su trabajo después de recibir una actualización de su padre de que él y su esposa están divorciados y decide extender su descanso des... Leer todoUn ejecutivo publicitario de gran éxito decide suspender su trabajo después de recibir una actualización de su padre de que él y su esposa están divorciados y decide extender su descanso después de revelar que su padre es diabético.Un ejecutivo publicitario de gran éxito decide suspender su trabajo después de recibir una actualización de su padre de que él y su esposa están divorciados y decide extender su descanso después de revelar que su padre es diabético.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I think there were two movies here: the one about the workplace, with a little subplot about the father; and the one about the father, with a little subplot about the workplace. I suspect, with no huge evidence, that someone had an emotional investment in not leaving material out. Some of the details have the ring of autobiography.
Several big talents appear in the movie: not only Jackie Gleason, Tom Hanks, and Eva Marie Saint but also Hector Elizondo and, in a tiny role, Dan Castellaneta. Nobody does anything here that he hasn't done better elsewhere, but still it's good to see them all.
Over the years since it was released I have watched this dozen's of times. I never get tired of it. I am moved as David Basner is forced to face the reality of his parents divorce and tries to build an individual relationship with each of his parents.
I think this is much better than Splash, probably on par with BIG. Of course, just about anything with Tom Hanks is great simply because he is able to carry the load.
This movie tries too hard to be jokey. Director Garry Marshall is allowing Hanks to clown around a little too much. The broad comedy doesn't quite fit seeing how he's suppose to be a professional sweet talking the client. He is playing strictly as a wild creative ad exec who jokes around. The broad jokes don't fit either when the movie tries to move into more serious territories. The serious stuff has a bit more heft and that's due to genius of Jackie Gleason. He and Hanks have pretty good chemistry. I also have a minor problem with the over-use of montages to drive the story forward. It's lazy writing.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaRumor has it that director Garry Marshall would not go ahead with the making of this film without the inclusion of Jackie Gleason. In poor health, Gleason had grown tired of filmmaking, and wished to retire from the business. After several attempts to get him on board, Marshall finally called Gleason on the phone and insisted that if he didn't do this film, that the last film he would be remembered for was the box-office bomb Smokey and the Bandit Part 3 (1983). Gleason immediately accepted the offer on the condition that this would be his last acting role. In Marshall's 2012 memoir, "My Happy Days in Hollywood," he credits Ray Stark with asking Gleason the question about if he wanted "Smokey and the Bandit 3" being how he would be remembered.
- Citas
[last lines]
Max Basner: [to David] You're the last person I ever thought would come through for me.
- Versiones alternativasOne "unedited" print, formerly in HBO's library, removes the exchange between Max and David about their "best friends."
Selecciones populares
- How long is Nothing in Common?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Nothing in Common
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 32,324,557
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 3,279,650
- 3 ago 1986
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 32,324,557
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 58 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1