[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Do You Know the Muffin Man?

  • Película de TV
  • 1989
  • Unrated
  • 1h 30min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.6/10
453
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Do You Know the Muffin Man? (1989)
CrimenDramaMisterio

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA police officer and his wife are shocked to find that molestation has been going on at the neighborhood day care. They're devastated when they find that their own son might be a victim too.... Leer todoA police officer and his wife are shocked to find that molestation has been going on at the neighborhood day care. They're devastated when they find that their own son might be a victim too. Should they have known, should they have seen?A police officer and his wife are shocked to find that molestation has been going on at the neighborhood day care. They're devastated when they find that their own son might be a victim too. Should they have known, should they have seen?

  • Dirección
    • Gilbert Cates
  • Guionista
    • Daniel Freudenberger
  • Elenco
    • Pam Dawber
    • John Shea
    • Stephen Dorff
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    5.6/10
    453
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Gilbert Cates
    • Guionista
      • Daniel Freudenberger
    • Elenco
      • Pam Dawber
      • John Shea
      • Stephen Dorff
    • 11Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 1Opinión de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Nominado a 2 premios Primetime Emmy
      • 4 nominaciones en total

    Fotos7

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal28

    Editar
    Pam Dawber
    Pam Dawber
    • Kendra Dollison
    John Shea
    John Shea
    • Roger Dollison
    Stephen Dorff
    Stephen Dorff
    • Sandy Dollison
    Brian Bonsall
    Brian Bonsall
    • Teddy Dollison
    Matthew Laurance
    Matthew Laurance
    • Marvin Bernstein
    Anthony Geary
    Anthony Geary
    • Stephen Pugliotti
    Georgann Johnson
    Georgann Johnson
    • Mavis Richardson
    Bruce Fairbairn
    Bruce Fairbairn
    • Ellis Stockman
    William Prince
    William Prince
    • Arthur Richardson
    Graham Jarvis
    Graham Jarvis
    • Judge Allen
    Ruth de Sosa
    Ruth de Sosa
    • Susan Larrimer
    Natalie West
    Natalie West
    • Paula Stockman
    John Hammond
    John Hammond
    • George Olin
    D. Franki Horner
    • Miriam Stossburg
    Janet Eilber
    Janet Eilber
    • Dr. Martha Billington
    Cassy Friel
    • Melinda Stockman
    DeeDee Rescher
    DeeDee Rescher
    • Helen Wells
    • (as Dee Dee Rescher)
    Dale Swann
    Dale Swann
    • Lt. Dineen
    • Dirección
      • Gilbert Cates
    • Guionista
      • Daniel Freudenberger
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios11

    5.6453
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    1cjcalv

    Completely irresponsible filmmaking trying to cash in on the mass hysteria of the times.

    Back in the 80's, a wave of fear spread through North America with the belief that underground satanic cults were infiltrating all parts of society, including day-care centers. A rash of charges were brought against day-care workers all over the U. S., as well as Canada and other parts of the world on suspicion of sexually abusing children as part of organized satanic rituals. Despite children reporting fantastical and in some cases physically impossible occurrences, there were trials and many people did go to prison. Those who weren't found guilty, had their lives ruined. The satanic panic was all made possible by overzealous prosecutors, therapists, mental health workers, law enforcement, religious fundamentalists, and fearful parents. The media accepted it without any skepticism. However, there was little or no evidence ever found in any cases. No blood, no dead babies, no nothing. It was all mass hysteria. The idea of satanic ritual abuse was a hoax. Children were asked leading and suggestive questions, and often interviewed dozens of times. Children who said nothing happened, we're not believed. They were only believed after giving investigators the answers they wanted to hear. It was a modern day witch hunt.

    Sadly this film is just one more example of how the media played a role in the satanic panic. When people abandon reason in favor of emotion and superstition, it can have terrible consequences. This movie creates a narrative that plays into the fears of the time and passes the story off as being based on facts. Besides wrongful convictions, one of the biggest tragedies of the satanic ritual abuse panic is that so many children in these cases may now as adults still believe that they were victims of SRA. How traumatic must that be? Finally, while police and prosecutors were chasing and charging people in imaginary satanic cults with horrific crimes, real cases of child abuse, often perpetrated by family members, went unpunished. I guess it's easier for people to accept that bad things happen in the world because of "the Devil", than to have to face and try to solve complex societal problems like poverty, income inequality, social justice, racism, and sexism.
    1Ankhoryt

    I only finished the movie because meanwhile, I was writing this review....

    Ugh. Yes, it's exactly like the McMartin mess, or the horrific arrests in Wenatchee, Washington. In the movie, the mother keeps aggressively questioning her little boy, over and over and over, until he finally tells her what she obviously wants to hear. The court investigators and "therapists" repeat the pattern. The questioning itself is sexually creepy, a relentlessy repeated assault in its own way.

    The moviemakers throw in a doctor talking about physical evidence of abuse, maybe to justify the film's point of view: that two- to four-year-olds never make "things like this" up. Well, they will if every adult they know is asking them to. The way this piece endorses such discredited interrogation techniques makes watching it an exercise in frustration for anyone who knows what it takes to get a successful prosecution in real life.

    (They also add a special arrest incident towards the end to "prove" their case -- no parallel to this fictional incident ever occurred in real life. Can't say more here without turning this into a spoiler, but you'll know it when you see it.)

    Yes, children are abused, sometimes by paid care providers. But to watch a movie which affirms the ludicrous, hysterical accusations against so many totally innocent people, to watch re-creations of the trials that ruined the lives of countless children as well as the lives of the accused -- I didn't think I'd last until the end. It's just too sad, and made more so by the writing team's seeming endorsement of the abusive, paranoid, obsessional questioning techniques that started -- what can we call it? The bonfire of the sanities?

    No one I know has ever been accused of child abuse, thank heaven, but my 12-times-over-great grandmother was accused of witchcraft and killed for it. Mobs filled with what they think is holy anger are just as dangerous now as three hundred years ago. Sensational drivel like this -- "These accusations of Satanic abuse are cropping up all over the country, there must be something there!" "So tell the jury that!" -- just eggs them on.

    And whoever thought it was a good idea to have kids under ten, some of them under five, play these roles? It's traumatic to watch them delivering their lines; how much more traumatic was it to act these parts? The moviemakers' commitment to fight child abuse apparently doesn't apply to themselves. And what were the child-actors' parents THINKING? "Melinda" (uncredited, at least in the version on the A&E Network in 2005, but I think it was Cassy Friel) and "Teddy" (Brian Bonsall) were terrific. Professionals or not, though, they were too young to be exposed to this material, much less to be paid to act it out. Despite ruthlessly exploiting these real-life children, "Do You Know The Muffin Man" got an Emmy nomination for directing -- which just goes to show how crazed things were, back in 1989.
    Buckey-2

    This Is The Worst Film I Have Ever Seen

    This is the worst film I have ever seen. The reason I disapprove of this film is because it automatically assumes that the characters who were accused of ritual abuse, (in that case), were guilty. It is based on the McMartin trial, although the makers of this film (CBS), do want to admit it. The only purpose of making this film was to destroy any chance of fair trial for the McMartin family.
    10toesboytoejam

    something to "watch"

    Being a victim myself, every parent should be aware of the signs. This might be a good example. Maybe watch this one with your child, talk with them about the movie and look for the signs.
    1plaid ideals

    not quality at all.

    This movie was terrible. It was so very terrible.

    Most annoying was the way the trial was conducted. The defense attorney is allowed to ramble on and on when questioning a witness without the prosecution making any objections. He attacks the children brought to give testimony with cruel ferociousness and repeatedly yells at them that they're lying. These just aren't things that they subject children who have been sexually abused to. The trial is silly and it ruins the whole movie...(Law & Order has spoiled me for courtroom accuracy-ness).

    Más como esto

    Our Guys: Outrage at Glen Ridge
    6.3
    Our Guys: Outrage at Glen Ridge
    Too Close to Home
    6.2
    Too Close to Home
    For My Daughter's Honor
    6.0
    For My Daughter's Honor
    Shameful Secrets
    5.7
    Shameful Secrets
    Gone in the Night
    6.6
    Gone in the Night
    A Mother's Revenge
    6.1
    A Mother's Revenge
    When He Didn't Come Home
    6.2
    When He Didn't Come Home
    Terror in the Family
    5.7
    Terror in the Family
    Cries Unheard: The Donna Yaklich Story
    6.1
    Cries Unheard: The Donna Yaklich Story
    Explózia
    7.1
    Explózia
    La jugada
    6.5
    La jugada
    Cries from the Heart
    6.6
    Cries from the Heart

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      A TV movie made for the CBS network.
    • Citas

      Helen Wells: You know who turned me down flat? Miriam Slossburg.

      Kendra Dollison: Josh's mom?

      Helen Wells: Sunday night. She gets Alex up out of bed at 2:00 a.m. He meets them at the E.R. You know what it was?

      Kendra Dollison: What?

      Helen Wells: Gonorrhea. It was Josh.

    • Conexiones
      Featured in The 42nd Annual Primetime Emmy Awards (1990)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 22 de octubre de 1989 (Estados Unidos)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • Wer hat Angst vorm schwarzen Mann?
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Los Ángeles, California, Estados Unidos
    • Productora
      • The Avnet/Kerner Company
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 1h 30min(90 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Stereo
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.