CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.4/10
991
TU CALIFICACIÓN
En Texas, el ingenuo Travis Rogers renuncia a su trabajo para casarse con su amada Stephanie Lawrence y trabajar con su suegro.En Texas, el ingenuo Travis Rogers renuncia a su trabajo para casarse con su amada Stephanie Lawrence y trabajar con su suegro.En Texas, el ingenuo Travis Rogers renuncia a su trabajo para casarse con su amada Stephanie Lawrence y trabajar con su suegro.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I found this movie from one of those 1980 retrowave channels, playing new synthwave songs over 1980s films (really recommend this style of video on youtube, strong nostalgia vibes).
This film is very 1980s, the style the film has is fantastic, the settings of Dallas and rural Americaare bith stunning in their own way and full of life. I'm extremely grateful for all the reviews here, sad for the ones who got too many downvotes, because this film is immoral which needs to be know(consequences dont exist and ofcourse the only good Father figure turns out to be a sod). There's a lot of attempts at jokes and smart lines but barely any land. It's also more crude than it should or needs to be.
The strangest thing is what was this film made for, who was it made for? It goes in unpredictable directions it doesn't seem to commit, its on the one hand both trying to be sad and funny about the wedding disaster, difficult to balance. A couple of weird dream sequences.
Travis is a fool, but as a character you understand and sympathise how he gets in the predicaments throughout the film. But he gets the chance to marry a beautiful woman who at least is committed to him, a father in law who wants to bring him in as a partner into his business (insane, nowadays you think) - Travis had it all laid out for him, but hes 20 so ofcourse he finds it scary. But they do capture the love of a new beast car for a man and how that and a beautiful woman can be Escapism Kryptonite. The Jonni character is sultry but thankfully given some depth at the end, but for both women in the story, the connection with them and Travis doesnt feel there.
Ive now finished this film, its after 1am and my ears are still ringing from the rock gig I was at, and Im not sure what to take from this film - probably worth watching just for that confused feeling I'll sleep on.
This film is very 1980s, the style the film has is fantastic, the settings of Dallas and rural Americaare bith stunning in their own way and full of life. I'm extremely grateful for all the reviews here, sad for the ones who got too many downvotes, because this film is immoral which needs to be know(consequences dont exist and ofcourse the only good Father figure turns out to be a sod). There's a lot of attempts at jokes and smart lines but barely any land. It's also more crude than it should or needs to be.
The strangest thing is what was this film made for, who was it made for? It goes in unpredictable directions it doesn't seem to commit, its on the one hand both trying to be sad and funny about the wedding disaster, difficult to balance. A couple of weird dream sequences.
Travis is a fool, but as a character you understand and sympathise how he gets in the predicaments throughout the film. But he gets the chance to marry a beautiful woman who at least is committed to him, a father in law who wants to bring him in as a partner into his business (insane, nowadays you think) - Travis had it all laid out for him, but hes 20 so ofcourse he finds it scary. But they do capture the love of a new beast car for a man and how that and a beautiful woman can be Escapism Kryptonite. The Jonni character is sultry but thankfully given some depth at the end, but for both women in the story, the connection with them and Travis doesnt feel there.
Ive now finished this film, its after 1am and my ears are still ringing from the rock gig I was at, and Im not sure what to take from this film - probably worth watching just for that confused feeling I'll sleep on.
Well upon the premise above some moronic guys will choice the first one, it what's happen with younger teenager George Newbern when he is about to marry with a beauty Leslie Hope, however lingers to buy an expensive fancy imported Italian car from whom he can't afford likewise a Lamborghini from Emerald Motors, making a parody with the famous G. M. worst the eye-candy seller Kimberley Foster also pushes all kind of overpriced accessories that increases an stratospheric price, even George got just 5.000 dollars in advance only.
Thus the crook Boss's dealer Mark Perella delivers to silly boy a tempered car composed by used parts, instead which he did make the text drive with the sexy Kimberley, he did not ask an extended warranty, then after got the outwardly perfect car and takes a ride back home the red brighter Lambo breaks in the middle of night, meanwhile at your city his fiancée waiting for the wedding.
It was not a total disaster as the car, however too much pointless and flimsy, it's crucial to emphasize the Texan's character portraits by Barry Corbin whereby he really was, the remains is just palatable with several gorgeous kittens around.
Thanks for reading.
Resume:
First watch: 2024 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6.25.
Thus the crook Boss's dealer Mark Perella delivers to silly boy a tempered car composed by used parts, instead which he did make the text drive with the sexy Kimberley, he did not ask an extended warranty, then after got the outwardly perfect car and takes a ride back home the red brighter Lambo breaks in the middle of night, meanwhile at your city his fiancée waiting for the wedding.
It was not a total disaster as the car, however too much pointless and flimsy, it's crucial to emphasize the Texan's character portraits by Barry Corbin whereby he really was, the remains is just palatable with several gorgeous kittens around.
Thanks for reading.
Resume:
First watch: 2024 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6.25.
I saw this about 10 years ago ... but really like it. Here's what I remember of the movie:
A young man travels a long distance to buy an expensive sports car a few days before his wedding. His new car has problems and he is stranded. He trys to get the car fixed but finds out because he didn't buy an "extended warranty" there is no warranty on the car and he has bought a worthless lemon.
He sets out to get even with the dealership. Along the way he meets a beautiful woman. He tries to buy a bottle of Dom Perignon Champagne because she tells him it makes her wild. He gets robbed at the liquor store when trying to buy the champagne. The crooks also steal his champagne. Movie is very funny, strange, and entertaining.
A young man travels a long distance to buy an expensive sports car a few days before his wedding. His new car has problems and he is stranded. He trys to get the car fixed but finds out because he didn't buy an "extended warranty" there is no warranty on the car and he has bought a worthless lemon.
He sets out to get even with the dealership. Along the way he meets a beautiful woman. He tries to buy a bottle of Dom Perignon Champagne because she tells him it makes her wild. He gets robbed at the liquor store when trying to buy the champagne. The crooks also steal his champagne. Movie is very funny, strange, and entertaining.
From what the IMDb reveals, "It Takes Two" was pretty much thrown away during its scant theatrical release despite being a major studio production. If you ask me, it shouldn't have been released at all. Actually, it shouldn't even have been made. I've tried to think of at least one point of merit to be found, but I can't think of anything nice to say about the movie at all. It goes wrong in every way you can think of. None of the characters in the movie is the least bit sympathetic, and with that in mind you can probably understand why there isn't the least bit of chemistry between the two leads. The script is a real mess - although the movie only runs 79 minutes long, there is a ridiculous amount of padding. Maybe if the movie had been funny such problems could have been overlooked, but there's not one laugh to be found. It'll take two minutes watching the movie to realize you're watching a stinker.
Absolutely moronic user-rating for such a pleasant and well made little film which being in Australia, I have only ever known as MY USED CAR. It would lead one to believe that decency, LACK of vitriol, language and violence just doesn't sit well with today's viewing audience. I agree with whoever likened this to THE WEDDING SINGER. Both films promote a feel-good yet family-orientated slant on youthful zest and maybe even excess.
Just days before his wedding to Stephanie (and has ANYONE ever seen a prettier girl, let alone a BRIDE than exquisite cutie - Leslie Hope?) young Travis just HAS to have himself a new supercar...some kinda tricked-up Lambo look-alike the majority of which was "made in Taiwan!" His dreams turns to an outright horror-show when the car falls apart like a cheap suit. Time, he thinks to take it up to the shonky car dealership and its rat-bag owner!
While Stephanie and her long suffering dad, together with wall to wall guests line the church waiting with little expectation of ever seeing Travis again ("Never did trust that boy" intones her dad at regular intervals) our hero is living his revenge, with the help of the beautiful sales girl who persuaded him to buy the wreck in the first place. Will Stephanie have to take a back-seat to the new Jill-come- lately? Is someone else going to get heartbroken here? Will he make the wedding? Well, whaddya think?
I loved this film - any romantic would! if you don't like it - don't watch it! Realistically a 6.5! It doesn't AIM any higher!
Just days before his wedding to Stephanie (and has ANYONE ever seen a prettier girl, let alone a BRIDE than exquisite cutie - Leslie Hope?) young Travis just HAS to have himself a new supercar...some kinda tricked-up Lambo look-alike the majority of which was "made in Taiwan!" His dreams turns to an outright horror-show when the car falls apart like a cheap suit. Time, he thinks to take it up to the shonky car dealership and its rat-bag owner!
While Stephanie and her long suffering dad, together with wall to wall guests line the church waiting with little expectation of ever seeing Travis again ("Never did trust that boy" intones her dad at regular intervals) our hero is living his revenge, with the help of the beautiful sales girl who persuaded him to buy the wreck in the first place. Will Stephanie have to take a back-seat to the new Jill-come- lately? Is someone else going to get heartbroken here? Will he make the wedding? Well, whaddya think?
I loved this film - any romantic would! if you don't like it - don't watch it! Realistically a 6.5! It doesn't AIM any higher!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaKate Rodger's debut.
- ErroresWhen in his stomach he paddles the wrong direction, they way he paddles he would go away from his fiancée not towards her.
- Bandas sonorasDown Dallas Alley
Performed by Buckwheat Zydeco
Produced by Ted Fox
Written by Stanley Dural Jr. and Ted Fox
From the 1988 album, "Taking It Home"
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is It Takes Two?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 344,375
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 344,375
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Sexo sobre ruedas (1988) officially released in India in English?
Responda