Agrega una trama en tu idiomaSharon Newton (Cassie Stuart) leads the uncooperative James Richards (Charles Dance) into a world of misplaced government secrets, capitalistic artists and bungling secret agents.Sharon Newton (Cassie Stuart) leads the uncooperative James Richards (Charles Dance) into a world of misplaced government secrets, capitalistic artists and bungling secret agents.Sharon Newton (Cassie Stuart) leads the uncooperative James Richards (Charles Dance) into a world of misplaced government secrets, capitalistic artists and bungling secret agents.
Michael Müller
- Boyce
- (as Michael Mueller)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
What a strange movie. The story is amazingly thought-provoking and intriguing. Think of all the hidden secrets a city like London hides beneath it's surface? All the archives of wartime experiments, government mysteries, documents and information never meant for public eye.
You have a young woman trying to convince a statistician (?) played by Charles Dance that there are hidden messages or clues of a bigger picture in some wartime archive films.
The story sadly never quite uses all of it's potential. It's interesting all the way, but you're never really sure what is going on until the very end and the motivations of the characters are left a bit unknown. They're basically just intrigued and driven by pure interest rather than a real cause.
What makes the movie a bit messy and difficult to follow, is the fact that there are a few separate leads they're following, the archived films and a few documents they find at a waste dump. You also have people trying to catch them, but you're not really sure why. At least I was left a bit puzzled of what's going on at times, but maybe that was the point. You never know what you find, if you just look carefully.
Definitely an interesting story, but the execution is a bit flawed and dated. It's got a very strong late 80s vibe to it and it's a bit of an artsy one. Someone might call this a "strange one", but definitely worthwhile if you catch it somewhere.
You have a young woman trying to convince a statistician (?) played by Charles Dance that there are hidden messages or clues of a bigger picture in some wartime archive films.
The story sadly never quite uses all of it's potential. It's interesting all the way, but you're never really sure what is going on until the very end and the motivations of the characters are left a bit unknown. They're basically just intrigued and driven by pure interest rather than a real cause.
What makes the movie a bit messy and difficult to follow, is the fact that there are a few separate leads they're following, the archived films and a few documents they find at a waste dump. You also have people trying to catch them, but you're not really sure why. At least I was left a bit puzzled of what's going on at times, but maybe that was the point. You never know what you find, if you just look carefully.
Definitely an interesting story, but the execution is a bit flawed and dated. It's got a very strong late 80s vibe to it and it's a bit of an artsy one. Someone might call this a "strange one", but definitely worthwhile if you catch it somewhere.
One of the better British films of the last 20 years and criminally neglected - it doesn't appear to be currently available on video let alone DVD.
Intriguing (and somewhat unsettling) plot. Sensible portrayals - no overacting, Unusual settings - a London rarely seen either in life or on screen. Well constructed - the atmosphere builds beautifully.
All in all, it puts so much of recent British cinema to shame.
And we go and bury it.
Intriguing (and somewhat unsettling) plot. Sensible portrayals - no overacting, Unusual settings - a London rarely seen either in life or on screen. Well constructed - the atmosphere builds beautifully.
All in all, it puts so much of recent British cinema to shame.
And we go and bury it.
10samwise2
I loved this film for two reasons.
Firstly, it was well written and the direction was strong which is something often lacking in a British film.
Secondly, the scenes of London were fantastic; especially those parts of the city not always open to the public eye.
Firstly, it was well written and the direction was strong which is something often lacking in a British film.
Secondly, the scenes of London were fantastic; especially those parts of the city not always open to the public eye.
I am another one who can't understand the good reviews. Maybe you have to be British to like it. I'm not so, I don't. Why did Charles Dance's character keep following the girl around? Tell her to give you the money she promised for ripping your jacket then tell her to go away. Movie over.
Instead we get, I'll take you here but I'm not going in. Next scene, he's in. Okay I'll take you there but I'm not going in. Next scene, he's in. He shows no interest in what she's looking for. Why keep following her? Does he really need the money to fix his jacket? She did steal his book too. Call the cops, have her arrested, end of bad movie.
Instead we get, I'll take you here but I'm not going in. Next scene, he's in. Okay I'll take you there but I'm not going in. Next scene, he's in. He shows no interest in what she's looking for. Why keep following her? Does he really need the money to fix his jacket? She did steal his book too. Call the cops, have her arrested, end of bad movie.
Hidden city is a film that I really wanted to like after reading the plot synopsis on the back of the Blu-ray cover. In many ways, I did like it; the plot was somewhat unique and interesting; the hidden locations in London really did spark a sense of wonder and imagination; and the main character is a reasonable educated individual which keeps the movie grounded. Some of the scenes were a little eerie in fact. I found the journey itself to be quaint, but a tad unrealistic in terms of character interactions. These quirks can be be more appreciated in older films like this one.
Sadly, the lead actress struggles to deliver her lines organically, it feels as though she's reading a script at times- memorised lines. That pulls the viewer out of the story. There is some general overacting with some of the side characters as well, but given the right atmosphere, this can be forgiven and I feel that Hidden City certainly has that atmosphere.
However, as is typical of an edgy 80s movie, there are unnecessary scenes and elements added which only take away from the storyline. Prolonged snogging scenes up close, lengthy moaning in the background of an office, some brief rear nudity on the TV screens in a party, and frontal nudity in one scene - all took this from a family appropriate mind-opening movie inspiring curiosity, to an awkward watch meant for a specific type of audience that I certainly am not. Were not for these moments, the film actually would have been one of my favourite films, despite all its other flaws.
The BFI Blu-ray looked good, albeit quite grainy, but as usual that only adds to the experience of this 80s film. BFI made the brilliant decision of adding old archive footage of London as special features to this disc, which I found thoroughly fascinating. It was as if I were experiencing a time capsule and it really matched the essence of the film. I can't think of other types of films that would be as appropriate to include the special content on than this one - which is all about exploration of undiscovered secret archives of London. Having these extras makes you feel like you are part of the preservation of London's history.
Sadly, the lead actress struggles to deliver her lines organically, it feels as though she's reading a script at times- memorised lines. That pulls the viewer out of the story. There is some general overacting with some of the side characters as well, but given the right atmosphere, this can be forgiven and I feel that Hidden City certainly has that atmosphere.
However, as is typical of an edgy 80s movie, there are unnecessary scenes and elements added which only take away from the storyline. Prolonged snogging scenes up close, lengthy moaning in the background of an office, some brief rear nudity on the TV screens in a party, and frontal nudity in one scene - all took this from a family appropriate mind-opening movie inspiring curiosity, to an awkward watch meant for a specific type of audience that I certainly am not. Were not for these moments, the film actually would have been one of my favourite films, despite all its other flaws.
The BFI Blu-ray looked good, albeit quite grainy, but as usual that only adds to the experience of this 80s film. BFI made the brilliant decision of adding old archive footage of London as special features to this disc, which I found thoroughly fascinating. It was as if I were experiencing a time capsule and it really matched the essence of the film. I can't think of other types of films that would be as appropriate to include the special content on than this one - which is all about exploration of undiscovered secret archives of London. Having these extras makes you feel like you are part of the preservation of London's history.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMichelle Fairley is of Scottish ancestry.
- Citas
Sharon Newton: [holds up her bag] It's in here what I've got to show you.
James Richards: Oh you have it with you, how convenient.
- ConexionesFeatures Aullido II (1985)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Die geheime Seite der Stadt
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 48 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Hidden City (1987) officially released in India in English?
Responda