Camille Claudel

How the american academy award could have forgotten one of the best performance of an actress ? it's a total mystery! The talent of Isabelle ADJANI is not at all recognized as it deserves. She's absolutely poignant in this part, from the young Camille to the crackin'up mature sculptor falling in despair and madness. The scene where Rodin touch her art in the dark and leads him to a scene where their respective egos fight each other, discovering the deep scars let by their devastating passion is an highlight of acting. At his level, it can be compared to "sunset boulevard" or "a streetcar named Desire".

There's some nice photography in here, which is what helped me get through this long (159 minutes) soap opera-type story about the girlfriend (the title name, played by Isabelle Adjani) of the famous sculptor Rodin (Gerard Depardieu).

There are a lot of closeups of Adjani which was fine with me as I never get tired of seeing her looks. "Camille" also was a sculptor but when the romance with Rodin went sour, she went literally crazy. This movie details that saga.

In addition to the cinematography, you get to see some great sculptures - really good pieces of work. I just wish they had shown how the artists accomplished these pieces. Since they are just actors, all it did was show the two leads chipping away chunks of clay, never showing any detail work.

At least, the film made me appreciate the art form more.

This is an excellent film and I highly recommend it. The imagery and soundtrack is lush, and the story focuses intensely on Camille's perfectionism and fortitude, all the while depicting her descent into madness, although some claim she wasn't mad, merely a woman ahead of her time, and thus ostracized.

From what I have read of various biographies of Camille Claudel, I understand that she was a woman ahead of her time; she scorned the bourgeois, just as many artists, writer, and musicians did -- in the same way that modern artists scorn the common, small-minded, and narrow society (read Hermann Hesse's Steppenwolf for a good understanding of the artist's situation in society).

Following the pattern of Vincent van Gogh and Franz Schubert, Camille Claudel was not a great "promoter" of her works, and, to make things worse, the bourgeois society, just like today, failed to understand her art (again, like the plight of Vincent van Gogh and many others).

At her core, Camille Claudel was a true rebel, not because she wanted to be, but because she had to. Camille Claudel was a true artist, in the very deepest sense.

In the realm of art and cinema, there are tales of triumph, stories of struggle, and then there is the heart-wrenching saga of Camille Claudel, masterfully portrayed in Bruno Nuytten's film. This cinematic masterpiece delves into the life of the 19th-century French sculptor Camille Claudel, bringing her intricate story to life with unparalleled grace and depth. It's a tale of passion, creativity, madness, and societal restraint, told through the lens of Camille's artistry.

Camille Claudel, portrayed by the brilliant Isabelle Adjani, was a remarkable sculptor. The film showcases her life journey, from her upbringing in the small village of Villeneuve-sur-Fère to her artistic blossoming in Paris under the guidance of none other than the renowned Auguste Rodin. Their encounter, a passionate rendezvous between student and master, ignites a profound and turbulent love affair.

The film captures the beauty of Camille's artistry as her hands meticulously shape exquisite works of art. Her sculptures are a testament to her modernity, audacity, and unwavering dedication to the craft. They reflect the struggles, the passions, and the relentless pursuit of her artistry, providing glimpses into her inner world. While Camille's works are captivating, her relationship with Rodin brings both admiration and scorn. Their union is a blend of student-mentor dynamics, artistic collaboration, and intense romantic involvement, leading to unrelenting societal judgment.

Yet, Camille is not solely defined by her artistic genius. Her life is marked by isolation, frustration, and the anguish of an unrequited love, intensified by Rodin's continued relationship with Rose Beuret. She becomes an artist alone, adrift in the sea of her emotions. Her world is a whirlpool of despair, loneliness, and financial struggle, interspersed with visions and obsessions that haunt her.

Camille's family disapproves of her lifestyle and choices, and the art world misunderstands her uniqueness. Her mother despises her perceived recklessness, her brother Paul harbors jealousy for her extraordinary talent, and her sister Louise schemes to claim Camille's inheritance. In the face of relentless adversity, Camille is committed to her artistic expression and personal journey.

Despite her distance from Rodin, he continues to support her with discreet acts of kindness. He writes letters to secure precious materials for her work, and he introduces her to influential art critics. However, these critics view her art as unconventional, mirroring her uniqueness and inner turmoil.

Camille Claudel, the artist par excellence, lived a life of wealth, beauty, determination, and promise in her youth. Still, her brilliance was overshadowed by the tragedy of her later years. She was left unrecognized, locked away in isolation, where her art became both her refuge and her torment. It was here, within the confines of her solitude, that she chose to destroy many of her own creations.

Camille's story is a testament to a life of artistry and heartache, unacknowledged talent, and the agony of unrealized dreams. Her impact on the art world was long overdue for recognition. Almost a century later, in 1988, her life's narrative was finally shared with the world through Bruno Nuytten's film, marking a turning point in the rediscovery of her art and her enduring legacy. The Musée Camille Claudel, opened in 2017 in Nogent-sur-Seine, France, stands as a national museum, dedicated to preserving and celebrating her art, ensuring that Camille Claudel's work rightfully finds its place in the annals of art history.

A *very* powerful film about a woman and her life. Acting and setup is so good that it can leave permanent scars on your psyche. Hitchcock can scare for a few minutes, while this movie can scare you for life. Do not watch while depressed. I give it a minimum of 8 out of 10. Wonderful job.