Las ratas asesinas

This movie was pretty good to watch. It wasn't boring at all. The rats were very interesting. This is what really bought the movie out. I also thought the movie was comical. I searched hard for this movie until I only found it for rental at blockbuster video. I was hoping to own this movie also (it was good enough to be a part of my horror collection). My rating of this movie would be 7 out of 10 stars.

I had wanted to see this movie for a long time, but none of the video stores in the various cities I lived in stocked it. Finally, I had to purchase the Blu-ray. Was it worth the wait? For the most part, no. Now, the big feature about the movie that made me want to see it - giant rats played by dachshunds - does provide a little amusement, as well as the equally not convincing puppetry work when we see close-ups of the giant rats' faces. However, the bulk of the movie surrounding the rat stuff is extremely tedious to sit through. There simply isn't a lot of story here, and the characters are written in a way to be extremely uninteresting. The script is bad enough, but under the direction of Robert Clouse, the movie moves at a glacial pace and without any real tension. Clouse also makes some very big continuity goofs, like how the weather changes from shot to shot in some scenes, and how the movie seems to be taking place in Canada in some scenes but in other scenes in the United States. If you must see this, wait until it comes on cable and record it, then watch it with your finger hovered over the fast-forward button on your remote. Make sure your remote has fresh batteries, because this movie will give your remote a workout.

'Deadly Eyes' received negative reviews from critics and apparently even writer James Herbert - on whose novel the film is based - didn't like it. As for me, I actually really enjoyed this, and I'll tell you why.

While the rats are not the most realistic looking rodents, they are ugly looking things. The film doesn't waste time before the rats start killing, but the film is not only about the rats. There's romance and drama here as well. And I enjoyed this. These events nicely fleshed out the characters, and the characters were very likable.

Sam Groom stars as the film's main protagonist, Paul Harris (portrayed by hunky Sam Groom, with the most beautiful voice!). He is a divorced man living with his young son, Tim. One of his students, Trudy (Lisa Langlois) has a crush on him, and tells one of her girlfriends she will have sex with Paul within a month.

But Paul is not interested in Trudy. He meets and falls in love with Kelly (Sara Botsford), who works for the Department of Health. I found their relationship very natural, and thought Sara Botsford did a great job as Kelly.

Back to the rats; the film shows no mercy as the rats even kill (and eat) toddlers and the elderly. Clever photography makes the events all the more realistic, and the suspense is well crafted. The total mayhem during the climax is reminiscent of 50s and 60s horror movies. Personally, I found 'Deadly Eyes' an above average horror thriller with substance, and a great addition to the 80s horror portfolio. I know it's hardly an original premise, as we've seen this sort of thing a hundred times before. I guess I was hooked on the characters.

Judging by critics, I'm in the minority here, but I loved the movie.

A pack of rats get very large, super-vicious and smart(er?) after eating a load of corn ready for shipment but somehow laced with steroids. Teacher, single father and lady magnet Paul Harris (Sam Groom) pairs up in all sense of the term with health official, independent woman and man eater entrepreneur Kelly Leonard (Sara Botsford) to save the city.

Very loosely based on James Herbert's first novel, "The Rats" also known under the daft moniker "Deadly Eyes" is a simple yet adroitly crafted horror b movie. There are very little surprises here: the black token character (Scatman Crothers in an all too brief appearance sadly), the stupid canon-fodder teenagers, the old guy who knows about the threat in question are all present in the mix.

But that doesn't mean it's all bad, mind you. In fact, there's plenty to keep an 80's horror fan entertained. First and foremost the acting is actually pretty decent although the characters are under developed. The gore ratio is adequate; the attack of the cinema set piece (replacing the novel's horrific attack of the train) throwing some serious punches in that regard. The rats themselves (dogs in rat suits as you probably already know) are a bit of a mixed bag, being equally odd, creepy and grotesque.

It is fair to assume that the film got better with time, its 80's origins giving it THAT particular lustre which current horror films often try to replicate (or so they claim) but hardly ever achieve. It certainly isn't earth shattering work and should be avoided by James Herbert's hard core fans at all cost. But if, like my little self, you're an 80's horror film buff then this could be a worthy addition to your collection (if you manage to get your hand on it, that is).

"Deadly Eyes" is a total cheesefest!Based on James Herbert's very good novel "Rats" it features dogs in rat suits terrorizing the city.My favourite scene is when "rats" are killing this little kid!The acting is pretty awful,the gore is almost non-existent and the direction is bad.However if you love really bad horror movies give this one a look-it is certainly enjoyable!