En un futuro distópico en el que los desviados son recluidos en campos de «reeducación», un luchador por la libertad y un prisionero inocente intentan sobrevivir al juego de matar o morir de... Leer todoEn un futuro distópico en el que los desviados son recluidos en campos de «reeducación», un luchador por la libertad y un prisionero inocente intentan sobrevivir al juego de matar o morir de sus decadentes opresores.En un futuro distópico en el que los desviados son recluidos en campos de «reeducación», un luchador por la libertad y un prisionero inocente intentan sobrevivir al juego de matar o morir de sus decadentes opresores.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Prisoner Shot by Mallory
- (sin créditos)
- Officer Arresting Chris
- (sin créditos)
- Guard
- (sin créditos)
- Officer Arresting Paul
- (sin créditos)
Opiniones destacadas
Yet another derivative of THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME, the voyeuristic bad guys like nothing better than a "hunt" of escapees, re-hashed yet again in the 90's with Jean-Claude Van Dumb as HARD TARGET! You might even like to reflect on similarities (in concept ONLY) with THE RUNNING MAN. If then you like grotesque violence, lesbian advances, excessive torture, guys with a hard-on for girl prisoners, yellow jump suits and girls shot through the breast, this is the film for you.
Incredibly, it was an enormous hit JUST in London at the midnight show in a theater in Leicester Square during the summer of 1982. They were queueing round the block for the privilege of watching Lynda Stoner and Olivia Hussey try to make it through the night. Damned if I didn't queue as well!
The main 'heroes' of the piece, are Paul (Steve Railsback), and Chris (Olivia Hussey - also known for such genre films as It, and Black Christmas). These also constitute the ubiquitous love interest within the plot. Whilst the inhabitants of the camp are humiliated and ritually abused in almost gladiatorial fashions, the main plot stems from the concept highlighted by the films title (although this was altered both for the UK video market - Camp Blood Thatcher; and the US market, Escape 2000), where there are five prisoners who are set 'free' from the camp so that seemingly elite persons from society can game hunt them with no consequences. All this leads to utterly predictable outcomes, resulting in an attempted overthrown of the 'authorities'!
The film exploits the concept of game hunting with elements of gore (again ubiquitous of the times of production), but doesn't really explore the societal elements that the protagonists are trying to subvert. We know nothing of the 'societies' structural elements that may instigate any kind of revolution or revolt. What exactly are the protagonists subverting? What are the policies, or dogmas of this 'society'? We only see the camp, and are not given any knowledge of the non-diagetic world beyond this.
The rich hunt the imprisoned. That is about as political as this movie gets. OK, so all movies don't necessarily need to have a message, granted. But if you are going to make a film set in a dystopian future, the world needs to be constructed so that we may understand why this future exists. To add insult to injury - despite the finale having a touch of gore - it almost seems like an episode of The A-Team, only people actually get shot. I almost forgot to say; a certain 'thing' accompanies one of the rich on the game hunt that he "found in a freakshow", which is essentially a badly dressed wolf-man. It's as if someone turned up on set in the wrong costume, and the director thought "well, we'll make it work!"
If you love bad filmmaking, with no social commentary, and no element of surprise or suspense, then you may well love this. But, it is, and will always be a bore!
www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
It twists the original tale by making it about a world where "Deviants" are sent to a glorified penal colony. To entertain the wealthy they are set off into the wilderness with a 3hr head start hunted down and killed.
Personally I liked this angle, not only did it work in theory but it worked in practice as well. Instead of playing the suspense and tension card like the others it becomes a full on action film and surprisingly (Considering I'm not an action guy) it very much works in the movies favor.
Turkey Shoot is a fantastic piece of Australian cinema and had it not been for a couple of unfortunate flaws could have been a true classic.
The Good:
Interesting twist on the classic tale
Very well paced
All round likeable movie
The Bad:
Looks and sounds very dated
Couple of spots fell flat
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe nude extras in the group shower scene were from a local hippie commune.
- ErroresWhen Chris cuts Ritter's hands off, traumatically amputating both of them, even though there are several arteries and veins in the stumps, other than blood on the stumps, there's no blood spurting out them at all. This is an impossibility. As long as Ritter's heart was flowing, blood would have initially shot out of the stumps slowing as his heart stopped.
- Citas
Charles Thatcher: One of you has been foolish enough to try to leave us before his re-education was completed. In my view this is treason, and will be treated as such. You will remember our motto: 'Freedom is obedience, obedience is work, work is life'. Well, now understand once and for all that the reverse is also true, 'Disobedience is treason, treason is a crime, crime will be punished!'
- Versiones alternativasExtreme violence and some nudity cut for US release to avoid an X-rating.
- ConexionesFeatured in Placer sin límites (1986)
Selecciones populares
- How long is Turkey Shoot?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- AUD 2,500,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 1,414,828
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,414,828
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 33 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1