[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

De ce trag clopotele, Mitica?

  • 1981
  • 1h 59min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.8/10
1 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
De ce trag clopotele, Mitica? (1981)
ComediaDrama

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA small world of bourgeois intrigues and frivolities lived with intensity by its own protagonists: Pampon's lover, Didina is in love with the barber Nae, who is Mitza's lover, while she is C... Leer todoA small world of bourgeois intrigues and frivolities lived with intensity by its own protagonists: Pampon's lover, Didina is in love with the barber Nae, who is Mitza's lover, while she is Cracanel's lover. One letter starts the ball rolling and ugly characters start revealing th... Leer todoA small world of bourgeois intrigues and frivolities lived with intensity by its own protagonists: Pampon's lover, Didina is in love with the barber Nae, who is Mitza's lover, while she is Cracanel's lover. One letter starts the ball rolling and ugly characters start revealing themselves in a burlesque-like fashion.

  • Dirección
    • Lucian Pintilie
  • Guionistas
    • Lucian Pintilie
    • Ion Luca Caragiale
  • Elenco
    • Victor Rebengiuc
    • Mariana Mihut
    • Petrica Gheorghiu
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    7.8/10
    1 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Lucian Pintilie
    • Guionistas
      • Lucian Pintilie
      • Ion Luca Caragiale
    • Elenco
      • Victor Rebengiuc
      • Mariana Mihut
      • Petrica Gheorghiu
    • 10Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 1Opinión de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Fotos

    Elenco principal47

    Editar
    Victor Rebengiuc
    Victor Rebengiuc
    • Pampon
    Mariana Mihut
    • Mita Baston
    Petrica Gheorghiu
      Tora Vasilescu
      • Didina Mazu
      Gheorghe Dinica
      Gheorghe Dinica
      • Nae
      Mircea Diaconu
      Mircea Diaconu
      • Iordache
      Florin Zamfirescu
      Stefan Banica
      Constantin Baltaretu
      Stefan Iordache
      Stefan Iordache
      • Mitica
      Ion Anghel
      Jorj Voicu
      Alexandru Dragan
      Tamara Buciuceanu-Botez
      Aurel Giurumia
      Ioana Craciunescu
      Aurel Cioranu
      Razvan Vasilescu
      Razvan Vasilescu
      • Dirección
        • Lucian Pintilie
      • Guionistas
        • Lucian Pintilie
        • Ion Luca Caragiale
      • Todo el elenco y el equipo
      • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

      Opiniones de usuarios10

      7.81K
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Opiniones destacadas

      8florinc

      This is where Kusturica learned from

      Not the best cinematography (who cares?), not the best acting (who cares?), not the best script (who cares?), but... It has a story, it has wit, it has fire, it has no dead moments, it is true, it has a heart, it has a strong punch at the last scene... It has everything to want to watch it again, and again. You want to be one of them because being one of them makes your blood boils, makes you cry with them because of petty lies, makes you smell the sweat of the wild party... At dawn, when the fumes of the heavy drinking start to dissipate you want to pull yourself together because of the hard-to-digest answer.

      It is where Kusturica was invented. It is where Kusturica learned his metier.

      Isn't this enough for a true experience?
      9unpopicakbill

      Balkanic spirit in a simple movie

      Is quite a simple movie to look at, as it does not contain way to much Romanian traditions that cannot resemble other cultures. The revelations come a long time after you saw it for the first time, when still part of the story is un-ended in your head, when you go through your life and see that mankind goes from absolute stupidity to geniality in a split second.

      It does not matter the dramas, as it does not matter the story more than to give you a good perspective on hard life and easy living.

      After seeing it twice you take this movie from a 7/10 to 9/10, 'cause your life perspective has changed.

      There is more than an eye can meet.

      This is not meant to be useful, don't read more, see the movie.
      8Ana_Banana

      A tour-de-force

      It had all the good premises: a great director, an all-star cast, and it was based on the works of a great author. Still...

      After the first shocks triggered by its naturalism and the real delight of many memorable satirical scenes (the heated political discourse in the public bath, the chase in the barbershop, the 'patriotic' Marseillaise singing, the eulogy for Mitica, and so on), the viewer becomes a bit uncomfortable.

      There is something over the top and inauthentic with all that boorish vulgarity and gratuitous violence, and most of all with the directorial post-modern 'reflections' (though his final verdict 'Let them die stupid' is not that exaggerated, as Caragiale himself has said he hated his characters). It's like seeing the world only through dark lenses.
      9engineer_aakramm

      why is the question "why?" a trivial question?

      Today I finally watched this movie with English subs, This movie looked bigger to me when all its dialogue was just a guess, when I first watched it, it was the Cairo festival the early 80's. I was a teenager, with good knowledge only of English, and the movie had no subtitles, by the middle of the show I said to myself: That is the best movie I ever seen, It was the transitions of the camera between the absolute and gross absurdity of a colorful human play and the gravity and silence of the horizon that made a distinction for this movie, almost all works centers about something, some meaning,

      but this work centers about the idea of nothing?!which is the whole thing... all existence.

      the idea of how trivial and frivolous all human desires and intentions are , a man brawling madly after a man to tell him : "don't slap me"!!!? a patriot shouting about patriotism while naked in a public bath !!? a man crying for the death of his dearest fellow, another man drinking in the honor of the occasion then a cow's mouth is chewing a branch in a lengthy shot, no big difference between most (seemingly) serious human emotions and the stomach emotions of a cow. (no exclamation needed!!) Three strong shots count: the sudden halt of the carnival(human life) and start of a serene but dirty landscape followed by the bells tolling, The dressed dog looking from the window in awe while the cast are singing carelessly out of tune opera, as if the dog was feeling something serious!, the dirty nature again with the shouting of a man's death and then the display of a white dog laying dead, then the zombie walk of the men in a slow rush to express the triviality of their life ending by death, (existence and what does it matter)

      finally the carriage slipping into mist in a sign of drifting into eternity at last, but the director then ruins even that only possible meaning of humanity by entering himself into the camera shot talking in a microphone, by that confirming that even what could be called human destiny or eternity is also mediocre, an existence deprived of all meaning, why are they tolling the bells for? there is no such a thing as why, no reasons exist, why an onion?! an onion is just an onion , it could have been any thing else. The bells are tolling just because they have ropes attached to them, when it is moved the bell moves with it and ring, that is the whole story nothing else, not births not weddings, not funerals, not any human business that is the truth of it they toll because the ropes were pulled, and why? that's it because they are there! The ants living on the elephant's body , they cannot picture the whole elephant, but yet it seems possible occasionally.
      9aakrammus

      the most intelligent movie for the last 130 years

      this piece of art is an internal reflection of a the human being who doesn't know his origin nor his destination, no beginnings or endings symbolized by the vain corrupt actions that he might commit at any time and an open but morbid infinite sky which keeps on appearing above a gypsy land. most movies which had some of that, like Satan's tango, or Underground were not on the level of this movie, until today I haven't found the English translation, but this movie is like a song written by Ache and Jethro Tull and Paganini all together. The philosophical content of this movie is not present in Swedish works by Ingmar nor films like songs from the second floor. As a whole I haven't seen much art in American Cinema, so we may set this movie as the only movie to belong to art as in music and painting, and hence as the best film until today. Congratulations to the director.

      Argumento

      Editar

      ¿Sabías que…?

      Editar
      • Trivia
        Romania's official submission to the 63rd Academy Awards (1991) for Best Foreign Language Film.

      Selecciones populares

      Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
      Iniciar sesión

      Detalles

      Editar
      • Fecha de lanzamiento
        • 1981 (Rumanía)
      • País de origen
        • Rumanía
      • Idioma
        • Rumano
      • También se conoce como
        • Carnival Scenes
      • Locaciones de filmación
        • Bucarest, Rumanía
      • Productoras
        • Casa de Filme Cinci
        • Casa de Filme Unu
      • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

      Especificaciones técnicas

      Editar
      • Tiempo de ejecución
        1 hora 59 minutos
      • Color
        • Color

      Contribuir a esta página

      Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
      • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
      Editar página

      Más para explorar

      Visto recientemente

      Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
      Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
      Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
      Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
      Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
      Para Android e iOS
      Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
      • Ayuda
      • Índice del sitio
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • Licencia de datos de IMDb
      • Sala de prensa
      • Publicidad
      • Trabaja con nosotros
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Política de privacidad
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.