O-bi, o-ba. Koniec cywilizacji

In the aftermath of a nuclear war, the last survivors are jammed together under one giant concrete dome, which is protecting the remnants of human civilization from the deadly atomic winter. As resources grow scarce people become more and more rampant, eagerly awaiting the arrival of a fabled Ark which is supposed to save them all. Amidst this mess we find Soft, whose job is to check the structural stability of their shelter. When he discovers that the dome is close to collapsing, he plunges himself into the pandemonium of the last human civilization in order to find out more about this mythical Ark.

I was able to watch a subtitled version of 'O-Bi O-Ba - The End of Civilization' at a festival, which had a segment dedicated to Eastern European sci-fi flicks. I didn't know what to expect - none of the actors rang any bells, neither did the director. Boy, was I in for a surprise! The acting is very solid throughout the movie, I especially liked the laconic fatalism of Soft's boss (Marek Walczewski) and the performances of Jan Nowicki as the Engineer, and of Soft himself (Jerzy Stuhr) who acts as our guide into the depth of the dome, and does a wonderful job of trying to keep calm and rationalize his way out of certain doom.

What struck me most, though, is that this movie works perfectly as an post-apocalyptic dystopia. It displays the (at times pointless) struggle of Soft against his and the others' fate, while at the same time painting a very dark and cynical portrait of human society living on borrowed time on the brink of certain oblivion. As we follow Soft into the underbelly of the dome's society, we discover its secrets layer by layer and realize how paper-thin the wall between madness and reason really is. I am not overly familiar with the circumstances in which the movie was made (it was shot when Poland was still a Socialist Republic), but the social commentary is quite clear. The movie lends itself to be read as criticism of a capitalist society, basically (and at times quite literally) devouring itself. My guess is that it works both ways and can also be applied as an attack on Socialist societal mechanisms (as the movie was shot during the last years of collapsing Polish Socialsm), but I'd venture on very thin ice if I were to substantialize this claim.

At the very least, this film revolves around the human condition and contests if the human race has grown in any way over the last centuries and millenia. Great stuff, go see it if you have the chance - especially if you're a fan of dystopian fiction!

Nothing for the post-apocalyptic action junkie but for those who like a story with some depth. Sadly, I had to watch a bad quality copy on YouTube, luckily that one got subtitles. Good if you are on the look out for something that provides a dystopian story that does not follow the path of Mad Max and its countless clones, but tries to give us a more realistic impression on a world after total mayhem. Recommended if you like movies a la The Day After, Thread etc.

A Comprehensive Analysis of *O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization* (1985)

Introduction *O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization* is one of the cornerstones of European dystopian cinema from the 1980s. Directed by *Piotr Szulkin* in 1985, the film is part of his series of thought-provoking science fiction works, which explore deep philosophical and social themes. It reflects the oppressive and bleak atmosphere of communist-era Poland, where censorship and control dominate, and people cling to hope-even if it is an illusion.

The film addresses key themes such as the manipulation of hope, the inefficiency of bureaucracy, and the collapse of human values in times of crisis. Through a grim visual environment and a narrative that blends absurdity with philosophical reflection, the film paints a terrifying picture of a post-apocalyptic world where survival is the only goal.

---

Plot Summary

The story takes place in an underground shelter where a group of survivors live after an unspecified nuclear catastrophe. The destruction on the surface has forced them into total isolation. The shelter consists of narrow corridors and decaying walls, creating a sense of suffocation and psychological distress.

The protagonist, *Soft*, is a government official working for the ruling authority of the shelter. His primary task is to maintain order among the survivors, but he finds himself surrounded by lies and deception. Everyone speaks of "The Ark," a mythical vessel that is supposedly coming soon to rescue the survivors and transport them to a better place, where life is less harsh and more hopeful.

As time passes, *Soft* discovers that *The Ark* is nothing more than a fabricated myth created by the authorities to maintain stability and prevent the population from succumbing to despair or rebellion. This illusion gives them something to live for, even though it is not real. As conditions in the shelter worsen, *Soft* begins to question whether exposing the truth is better than letting people live in blissful ignorance.

As tensions rise, society within the shelter begins to collapse. Rebel groups emerge, hysteria spreads, and the government loses control. In the end, it becomes evident that hope for salvation may be nothing more than an unattainable illusion, leaving the fate of the characters ambiguous.

---

Symbolism and Philosophical Themes

1. Hope as a Tool for Control One of the most significant themes explored in the film is how hope can be used to keep people obedient and submissive. *The Ark* is nothing more than a legend, yet it provides the survivors with a sense of purpose.

This concept parallels how political and religious ideologies are often used by oppressive regimes to manipulate people, offering false promises of salvation-whether through a "better future," a "utopia," or even "heaven"-to keep the masses under control.

2. The Absurdity of Bureaucracy and Corrupt Authority *Soft* is not an evil character, but rather a trapped bureaucrat. He is stuck between following orders and dealing with the grim reality of the shelter. He knows *The Ark* is a lie, yet he cannot openly acknowledge it.

This reflects the bureaucratic system that prevailed in communist regimes, where officials were merely cogs in a massive machine that cared little for human lives. Even when the truth is evident, bureaucracy remains paralyzed, fearing the loss of its power.

3. Social Collapse After Catastrophe The film serves as a psychological study of human behavior in times of crisis. In the absence of resources and security, people abandon morality and turn into desperate beings solely focused on survival.

The situation in the shelter deteriorates gradually, with rising anger, fear, and selfishness. Some characters become more brutal, while others descend into madness or complete isolation. The film illustrates how civilization is merely a fragile construct that can crumble easily when faced with a major catastrophe.

4. The Relationship Between Truth and Illusion The film forces the viewer to ask: is it better to live in a comforting illusion or to face a harsh reality? Most of the shelter's inhabitants prefer to believe in *The Ark*, even though there is no evidence of its existence.

On the other hand, when *Soft* discovers the truth, he finds no further meaning in life. The film suggests that some lies may be necessary to preserve human willpower because the truth, when inescapable, can be utterly devastating.

---

Visual and Musical Style

1. Cinematography The film employs a dark and bleak visual style, relying on dim lighting and desaturated colors to evoke feelings of isolation and despair. Most scenes within the shelter are filmed from tight, claustrophobic angles, reinforcing a sense of suffocation and entrapment.

The production design features decaying structures, rusted doors, and crumbling corridors, making the world feel like it is disintegrating, mirroring the psychological state of its inhabitants.

2. Soundtrack The soundtrack further enhances the film's tension and unease. Using distorted electronic tones and industrial noise, the music creates an atmosphere of paranoia and instability. The sounds are not merely background elements but integral to the film's unsettling ambiance.

---

Conclusion and Impact

*O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization* stands as one of the boldest European science fiction films of the 1980s, offering a terrifying yet intelligent examination of humanity's fate in the wake of catastrophe. Although classified as a sci-fi film, its messages extend to political and social realities, making it a critical analysis of societies that survive on deception and false promises.

The film leaves viewers with profound questions about the nature of hope, the role of authority in shaping perceived reality, and whether humanity can survive without illusions that provide meaning. More than three decades after its release, the film remains highly relevant, especially in a world where utopian promises often lead to dystopian nightmares.

I saw this movie in Hungary a long time ago, and it immediately became one of my all-time favorites, sharing this distinguished title with Tarantino's & Spielberg's films. (I haven't been successful in locating a dubbed or captioned English version so far. English language support would greatly increase the chances of this masterpiece for being recognized across the world.)

The movie is totally grotesque, and often shocking, spiced up with the perfect amount of cynicism & delicate humor. It is the ultimate depressing negative utopia; much superior in every sense to most flicks spewed up by Hollywood in the same genre.

Stellar cinematography gives way to average narrative devoid of the visual "shock" similar films like Threads & The Day After possess. But because it lacks shock, it is a thoroughly more enjoyable experience.

Moreover, it differentiates itself by providing insight into a less discussed aspect of the post-nuclear world:

the obnoxious nature of the human condition.