[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

1984

Título original: Nineteen Eighty-Four
  • 1984
  • R
  • 1h 53min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.0/10
85 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
POPULARIDAD
2,631
705
John Hurt, Bob Flag, and Suzanna Hamilton in 1984 (1984)
Trailer
Reproducir trailer3:00
1 video
99+ fotos
Dystopian Sci-FiDramaSci-Fi

En una sociedad de futuro totalitario, un hombre, cuyo trabajo diario es reescribir la historia, trata de sublevarse enamorándose.En una sociedad de futuro totalitario, un hombre, cuyo trabajo diario es reescribir la historia, trata de sublevarse enamorándose.En una sociedad de futuro totalitario, un hombre, cuyo trabajo diario es reescribir la historia, trata de sublevarse enamorándose.

  • Dirección
    • Michael Radford
  • Guionistas
    • Michael Radford
    • George Orwell
  • Elenco
    • John Hurt
    • Richard Burton
    • Suzanna Hamilton
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    7.0/10
    85 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    POPULARIDAD
    2,631
    705
    • Dirección
      • Michael Radford
    • Guionistas
      • Michael Radford
      • George Orwell
    • Elenco
      • John Hurt
      • Richard Burton
      • Suzanna Hamilton
    • 313Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 82Opiniones de los críticos
    • 67Metascore
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Nominada a1 premio BAFTA
      • 6 premios ganados y 3 nominaciones en total

    Videos1

    1984
    Trailer 3:00
    1984

    Fotos151

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 144
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal47

    Editar
    John Hurt
    John Hurt
    • Winston Smith
    Richard Burton
    Richard Burton
    • O'Brien
    Suzanna Hamilton
    Suzanna Hamilton
    • Julia
    Cyril Cusack
    Cyril Cusack
    • Charrington
    Gregor Fisher
    Gregor Fisher
    • Parsons
    James Walker
    • Syme
    Andrew Wilde
    Andrew Wilde
    • Tillotson
    David Trevena
    • Tillotson's Friend
    David Cann
    • Martin
    Anthony Benson
    • Jones
    Peter Frye
    • Rutherford
    Roger Lloyd Pack
    Roger Lloyd Pack
    • Waiter
    Rupert Baderman
    • Winston Smith as a Boy
    Corinna Seddon
    • Winston's Mother
    Martha Parsey
    • Winston's Sister
    Merelina Kendall
    Merelina Kendall
    • Mrs. Parsons
    P.J. Nicholas
    • William Parsons
    Lynne Radford
    • Susan Parsons
    • Dirección
      • Michael Radford
    • Guionistas
      • Michael Radford
      • George Orwell
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios313

    7.084.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    hojoe

    A labor of love

    I am frankly mystified by the comments of those who seem to find this film disappointing or inadequate, and even more by those who claim to prefer the 1956 version, which I consider to be inferior in every respect to the later version, except for some top quality performances by Donald Pleasence and Michael Redgrave in supporting roles. In my opinion, this later version of "Nineteen Eighty Four" is one of the best literary adaptations I've seen.

    The film was obviously a labor of love for director Michael Radford, who also co-wrote the screenplay. As noted in the end credits, the film "was photographed in and around London during the period April-June 1984, the exact time and setting imagined by the author". If this were a big-budget Hollywood bomb, I might consider that a publicity stunt, but in the case of this little-known, little-seen British film, it's fairly obviously a form of homage.

    The look of the film is extraordinary in its evocation of the world Orwell created, down to the tiniest detail. Although that world was obviously very different from the real world of 1984, a deliberate choice was made to stick with the Orwellian vision in every way, anachronistic technology and all, and I firmly believe it was the right choice, as opposed to the "updating" we sometimes see in adaptations of classic "futuristic" stories. Thus, we are treated to the baroque and slightly disorienting sight of black rotary-dial telephones, pneumatic document-delivery systems, old-fashioned "safety razors", tube radios, etc., all of which were already obsolete at the time of filming. And of course, the omnipresent black-and-white "telescreens" with rounded picture tubes.

    As Winston Smith, the story's protagonist, John Hurt is an inspired piece of casting; absolutely the perfect choice. Not only does he fit the author's description of Smith to a "T", but with the haircut he's given, he even bears a striking resemblance to Orwell himself. And there is no actor alive better than Hurt at evoking victimization in all its infinite gradations and variations. Suzanna Hamilton, relatively little-known here in the US, also does a fine job as Julia. The film also contains the final film appearance of Richard Burton, in one of his most fascinating and disturbing performances as O'Brien. And the great Cyril Cusack does a classic turn as Charrington, the pawnshop proprietor.

    Right from the opening scene, in which we look in on a screening of a short propaganda film, brilliantly conceived and executed by Radford, during the daily "two minutes hate", climaxing in Dominic Muldowney's memorable, genuinely stirring national anthem of Oceania played behind the gigantic image of Big Brother, we are catapulted headlong into Orwell's nightmare vision. While not a particularly long novel (my copy is 256 pages), it is nevertheless dense with ideas, and it would be impossible for a standard-length film to include them all, even if the audience could stand all the endless talking heads it would require. Given the inherent limitations, I think the film largely succeeds in preserving a good portion of the ideological "meat" of the novel. It is certainly extremely faithful in the material it does include. Even the incidental music by Eurythmics feels entirely appropriate, and doesn't in any way break the mood. In fact, it even enhances it.

    While I thought the 1956 version did a fairly good job for the time, it had a number of flaws in my estimation that made it far less successful an adaptation. For one thing, although the world it portrays is grim, it's not nearly grim enough. Also, Edmond O'Brien may have done a creditable job as Smith, but physically he's all wrong for the part. The portly, even chubby O'Brien bears little resemblance to the slight, emaciated, chronically exhausted, varicose-ulcerated Smith described in the novel. Neither is the 1956 version as faithful to the book; some of the material is softened, and there are odd, unexplainable alterations: O'Brien becomes O'Connor, and I don't think that Goldstein, the possibly imaginary leader of the possibly fictitious "Resistance", is even mentioned. At 90 minutes, it runs a good 23 minutes shorter than the later version, which necessitates the trimming of even more of the novel, for all you literary purists. In all, for me, the 1984 version of "Nineteen Eighty Four" is the definitive version; a remarkably vivid and memorable film.
    PIST-OFF

    Trust no government.

    So you feel like renting a movie. After a slow drive to the video store in which you try to avoid the police from extorting you, you enter a video store with enough security cameras to see parts of you that you've never seen. You would rent some porno but today you'll be paying in credit card and you sure don't want that census taker knowing you've seen all 50 volumes of clamlappers. So instead you rent 1984. The zit face behind the counter scan your card and instantly your personal information and spending history is all over the internet. When you get back home you pop in the tape, you would have a joint, but the government has decided that pot isn't in your best intrest. Neither is beer, cigarettes, fatty foods, caffine, red meat, abortions, pornography,flag burning, sex in general or any of the other things you use to enjoy. You sit down to watch your movie and relax the rest of the night when storm trooper-like police bust down your door and carry you away. Seems renting 1984 set off an alarm in all local police computers and got you on the thought police's wanted list. You should know better then to oppose your government in any way, shape, or form. You would fight back but all those gun laws eventually equled up to a ban on the second amendment. Sound like an impossible world? Sounds fictional? Watch it then take a look at the world around you. Your half way there. Enjoy what freedoms you have left before they're gone. I'm sure one day this movie will be considered illegal.
    7Xstal

    A Forecast of the Past, Present & Future...

    Winston Smith is bound inside a cage, he's upset all of the folks that pay his wage, by not dancing to the tune, of the Oceania goon, and ignoring all his righteous propaganda. To begin with, he's not thinking as he should, his maths is very poor, and that's not good, plus he's finding lots of time, to commit a sexual crime, by taking his young love into the woods. But Big Brother has a way that he can smother, and O'Brien is a rather vengeful mother, observation sets the trap, then you're caught like a starved rat, and there's nowhere you can run, or look for cover. Just imagine if your world was always seen, there were cameras to report where you had been, a device always recording, what you say, knows what you're hoarding, you spend your time with it just looking at its screen.

    God forbid!
    9eadaoin7

    Comments on Comments

    I really have only one thing to comment on. Most of the other reviewers have stated just about everything about this wonderfully gritty, dark, foreboding movie that still remains an eerie parallel to our lives today, especially in the last 2 years...

    But I'm confused by the number of people who have commented that claim to be put off by "the gratuitous nudity" by the two characters of Winston and Julia. Given the fact that everything in this society--waking up, food, habits, desires, work, workers, even the underwear and overalls--is so uniform, has it occurred to viewers that being nude was the only link to identity that these characters had? Everything in their world depends, thrives on sameness. Without clothes, everyone is unique. The two lovers were already in dire conditions by committing the sin of feeling for another human being, let alone carnally but in the heart. And they had to deceive and pretend and go through the motions of the dutiful cogs in the Big Brother wheel. But their only shared peace and comfort was their sacred time alone, and in love. They had finally found their own identities through loving each other. Their nudity was merely symbolic of that. In that sense, their union and expressions of that union only becomes more fragile, beautiful and honest, in such a heartless, cold, indifferent world.

    May that be truly said of us, and all of us...

    OK, that out of the way...one of the most gritty, realistic, honest translations ever to grace the screen. Wouldn't have changed a thing. Highly, highly recommended, along with the original 1955 version of "Animal Farm". Perfect double-feature for a somber, thoughtful evening's viewing.
    7aggelos-76652

    A well made tip of the hat to those who read the book

    This is a very well made movie the acting and atmosphere especially. This film is also very loyal to the book. The thing is it felt like you have had to read the book in order to get much needed context. The book put much much effort in world building as well as Winston's thoughts. In large both are missing here (partially limited by a movies run time I suppose), so many of the scenes greatly lose impact or straight up leave many questions to the viewer who hasn't read the book.

    Also, to me at least the missing information made the story feel like it is moving in fast forward. So the pacing felt a bit weird to me.

    Personally I enjoyed the film because it put the world and story outside my head. Making me visually look at this twisted world and also experience it from a perspective that's not mine. Which was really interesting.

    For these reasons I would recommend all people who read the book watch this movie but definitely not to people who haven't read the book.

    Más como esto

    1984
    6.9
    1984
    Animal Farm
    7.2
    Animal Farm
    Apartment Troubles
    4.2
    Apartment Troubles
    De hombres y ratoncitos. La fuerza bruta
    7.4
    De hombres y ratoncitos. La fuerza bruta
    Brasil
    7.8
    Brasil
    Fahrenheit 451
    7.2
    Fahrenheit 451
    1984
    4.5
    1984
    THX 1138
    6.6
    THX 1138
    Cuando el destino nos alcance
    7.0
    Cuando el destino nos alcance
    A Woman Possessed
    5.6
    A Woman Possessed
    2 Days in New York
    6.0
    2 Days in New York
    El planeta de los simios
    8.0
    El planeta de los simios

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      In poor health during most of the filming, Richard Burton had great difficulty remembering his lines and sometimes had to film a scene dozens of times before he could get it right. The scene in O'Brien's apartment where he is talking to Winston about Goldstein's book took a record of forty-one takes for Burton to say his speech without fumbling his lines.
    • Errores
      Winston reads a newspaper article titled "INSOC IN RELATION TO CHESS BROTHER WINS." The party name should be spelled "INGSOC."
    • Citas

      Winston Smith: [reads from Goldstein's book] "In accordance to the principles of Doublethink, it does not matter if the war is not real, or when it is, that victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won. It is meant to be continuous. The essential act of modern warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labor. A hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. In principle, the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects. And its object is not victory over Eurasia or Eastasia, but to keep the very structure of society intact." Julia? Are you awake? There is truth, and there is untruth. To be in a minority of one doesn't make you mad.

    • Créditos curiosos
      The movie begins with the title, "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."
    • Versiones alternativas
      From director of photography Roger Deakins: "Be careful which '1984' you watch as some do not have the 'Bleach Bypass' effect built in. As the effect was done on all the prints, the IP and subsequent INs do not reflect the intended look of the film."
    • Conexiones
      Featured in Eurythmics: Sexcrime (Nineteen Eighty-Four) (1984)
    • Bandas sonoras
      Oceania,'Tis For Thee
      Music by Dominic Muldowney

      Lyrics by Jonathan Gems

      Sung by the London Voices, directed by Terry Edwards

      Soprano soloist: Sally Mates

      Contralto soloist: Linda Hirst

      Conducted by Dominic Muldowney

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes24

    • How long is 1984?Con tecnología de Alexa
    • What are the Party members chanting at the end of the Two Minutes Hate? Some sources have subtitles saying "big!".
    • What is a Proletariat?
    • What is the significance of the "Oranges and Lemons" poem?

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 29 de mayo de 1986 (México)
    • Países de origen
      • Reino Unido
      • Alemania Occidental
      • Países Bajos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • Neunzehnhundertvierundachtzig
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Battersea Power Station, 21 Circus Road West, Nine Elms, London, Greater London, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(on location)
    • Productoras
      • Virgin
      • Umbrella-Rosenblum Films Production
      • Virgin Benelux
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • GBP 3,000,000 (estimado)
    • Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 8,430,492
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • USD 29,897
      • 16 dic 1984
    • Total a nivel mundial
      • USD 8,431,544
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 53 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Mono
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    John Hurt, Bob Flag, and Suzanna Hamilton in 1984 (1984)
    Principales brechas de datos
    What was the official certification given to 1984 (1984) in Japan?
    Responda
    • Ver más datos faltantes
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.