CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.9/10
1.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Caroline va a casarse con Sir Ralph e invita a su hermana Barbara a ser su dama de honor. Sin embargo, Barbara seduce a Ralph y se convierte en la nueva Lady.Caroline va a casarse con Sir Ralph e invita a su hermana Barbara a ser su dama de honor. Sin embargo, Barbara seduce a Ralph y se convierte en la nueva Lady.Caroline va a casarse con Sir Ralph e invita a su hermana Barbara a ser su dama de honor. Sin embargo, Barbara seduce a Ralph y se convierte en la nueva Lady.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Opiniones destacadas
Micheal Winner and the illustrious cast take the money and phone in the performances of this classic.
The direction is basic. The acting is 'scenery chewing in extremis', every single one bar Glynis Barber is terrible. Gielgud is clearly trading on his name at this point. Dunaway is Crawfordtastic.
The costumes and sets might be acceptable, but the editing, cinematography and direction are at times laughable.
We should expect this to be the subject of the, 'How Did This Get Made' podcast in the near future.
The spontaneous and gratuitous nudity is surely there just to keep some members of the audience awake.
The direction is basic. The acting is 'scenery chewing in extremis', every single one bar Glynis Barber is terrible. Gielgud is clearly trading on his name at this point. Dunaway is Crawfordtastic.
The costumes and sets might be acceptable, but the editing, cinematography and direction are at times laughable.
We should expect this to be the subject of the, 'How Did This Get Made' podcast in the near future.
The spontaneous and gratuitous nudity is surely there just to keep some members of the audience awake.
This film is another example of why perspicacious cinema-goers have always needed to be very wary when major studios decide to remake a well known classic. Perhaps IMDb should create a list of such remakes and give viewers the chance to vote on them as better or worse than the original, possibly adding comments when appropriate. Hopefully these comments might make the studios concerned much more wary about following this rather dubious practice. This 1983 film is a remake in colour of the classic black and white film of the same name starring Margaret Lockwood, which was released in 1945, and it can still be readily found on videotape. Unfortunately the original 1945 film is not and is becoming very hard to find outside the U.K. where Margaret Lockwood's name still commands enormous respect in the entertainment world.
Although this remake was able to obtain an R rating in the U.S.A. (by report only with considerable difficulty) it is in my opinion straight pornography- not because it realistically portrays the cruelty and violence of an eighteenth century execution at Tyburn, shows two women fighting with horsewhips, and includes a little more nudity than was generally regarded as acceptable at the time of its release, but because all these scenes were only peripherally necessary to the story line and were clearly only featured and prolonged in the way that they were for the purpose of audience titillation. If you want to be titillated in this way then by all means watch this remake which will probably provide exactly what you expect; but if you want to view a work of art which is in fact infinitely more sexy than this remake, join the demand for a DVD of the 1945 film (which is already available in PAL format for the European market) to be released for the North American market as well. This 1945 film has never been released in its original form in the U.S.A. because the meticulously recreated seventeenth century costumes were too low cut to be acceptable to the American censors of the period, so the original version had to be re-filmed before it could find its way into North American cinemas. A North American DVD of this original release would therefore be a fitting tribute to a great work in this its diamond anniversary year.
Although this remake was able to obtain an R rating in the U.S.A. (by report only with considerable difficulty) it is in my opinion straight pornography- not because it realistically portrays the cruelty and violence of an eighteenth century execution at Tyburn, shows two women fighting with horsewhips, and includes a little more nudity than was generally regarded as acceptable at the time of its release, but because all these scenes were only peripherally necessary to the story line and were clearly only featured and prolonged in the way that they were for the purpose of audience titillation. If you want to be titillated in this way then by all means watch this remake which will probably provide exactly what you expect; but if you want to view a work of art which is in fact infinitely more sexy than this remake, join the demand for a DVD of the 1945 film (which is already available in PAL format for the European market) to be released for the North American market as well. This 1945 film has never been released in its original form in the U.S.A. because the meticulously recreated seventeenth century costumes were too low cut to be acceptable to the American censors of the period, so the original version had to be re-filmed before it could find its way into North American cinemas. A North American DVD of this original release would therefore be a fitting tribute to a great work in this its diamond anniversary year.
Heavy handed adventure with Faye (who followed up Mommie Dearest with this) robbing stage coaches in full period costume. The production is pretty decent, as is the cast, but the film is so woefully over-the-top that you just want to slap director Michael Winner sometimes. What could have been. And that nudity thrown in for no apparent reason is absurd. The scene where Faye whips the clothes off the wife of her lover at his funeral is classic camp, however. Best performance is given by Denholm Elliott, who plays Faye's put-upon husband. This is in the same league as the even more preposterous Mata-Hari...which even shares co-star Oliver Tobias! This one is good for a few laughs.
Another film I had the misfortune to pay money to see. Major over acting on the part of Alan Bates, Faye Dunaway, and Faye Dunaway's eyebrows. You also get to see two women, naked from the waste up, whipping each other.
Mrs. Dunaway, you should have known better.
Mrs. Dunaway, you should have known better.
This movie is listed as an action/comedy, but the only thing remotely amusing is in Marina Sirtis's nude scene. While running away, it is quite evident that she has a tan line that indicates a French cut bikini bottom, something I would think was quite rare in the 17th century.
I highly recommend that instead of this video, one either rents the original or a copy of Finney's excellent "Tom Jones".
I highly recommend that instead of this video, one either rents the original or a copy of Finney's excellent "Tom Jones".
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFaye Dunaway turned down a role of Regan in a British television production of King Lear (1983) starring Sir Laurence Olivier to be in this movie.
- ErroresDuring the seduction scene with Kit and Caroline, some of the portraits on the walls are obviously 18th century.
- Créditos curiososMichael Winner's editing credit appears under the name "Arnold Crust."
- Versiones alternativasUK censor James Ferman requested cuts for the UK cinema version to the infamous horse-whip fight between Faye Dunaway and Marina Sirtis claiming that shots of whipped breasts should not be passed by the BBFC. However he was overruled following protests by Michael Winner, who was supported by Kingsley Amis and Karel Reisz (among others) after they viewed a private showing of the film. Following the introduction of the 1984 Video Recordings Act Ferman got his wish and the scene was edited by 13 secs for the 1987 VCI video release. Those cuts were waived for the 2016 video release.
- ConexionesFeatured in X-Rated (2004)
- Bandas sonorasCuckolds All A Row
(uncredited)
Traditional: Playford's Dancing master, 1651
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Wicked Lady?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 8,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 724,912
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 724,912
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the French language plot outline for The Wicked Lady (1983)?
Responda