L'avare

L'avare is not my all-time favorite play but it is worth seeing, since Harpagon is a truly memorable character. And in this version Harpagon is played by the extremely funny Louis de Funès, which, as usual, shines. The original script has not been touched, so it may be hard for some to get into the movie, and since the sets are minimal, a little imagination is required. But if you get into it, you'll have fun. The cast is good, but the play is centered around Harpagon and Louis de Funès is absolutely perfect for that role. This is a comedy as in comedy at the time of Molière. At this time, a comedy was a play thats IS NOT a tragedy, meaning it does not have a sad ending, so don't expect a laugh-out-loud comedy. One thing that I don't like about this play/movie is the end. But this movie is still worth your time, even if it is just to introduce you to Molière.

75%

That French people call their mother tongue the language of Molière and that the equivalent of a Tony award in France is named Molière say everything about the playwright's national legacy, of Shakespearian magnitude (and on that basis, you can guess how French nicknamed English language, too).

Like Shakespeare indeed, Molière created a gallery of unforgettable characters whose names became regular terms of references. A 'Tartuffe' is a bigot, an Alceste a misanthrope and finally, a 'miser' is called Harpagon, from the name of one of the most defining "Molieran" characters, a sexagenarian who loves his money more than his children, jealously hiding his golden coins in a treasured box buried in his yard. As a kid, I thought he was the live version of Scrooge McDuck, the little box being a miniature of the cubic money bin, English scholars might see Ebenezer Scrooge in the cheap bastard.

Greed and misery are traits many kids can relate to and it's not a hazard that Harpagon is one of the characters they immediately identify. Indeed, there's nothing more ridiculous than a man who, driven by an irrational obsession, acts like a child. The most memorable sequence is when Harpagon discovers it's been stolen and goes into a tirade as famous as Don Diego in "El Cid" or Cyrano's nose monologue: Harpagon even catches his own hand as if it belonged to the thief, his hysteria comes to such a point, he stops to be evil and puts the 'pathetic' in sympathetic.

And this "sympathetic villain" is the persona that defined the most iconic French comedian of all-time: Louis de Funès. 'Fufu', with all his childish tantrums and manic obsessions, was born to play Harpagon. The thing is "being born" doesn't mean "being trained" and French Comedy in terms of 'Comedie Française' is no joking matter, so when De Funès suggested the idea to his long-life companion director Jean Girault, he didn't change one single line to the original play, out of respect to the Master. One of his personal regrets was not to have embraced the noble 'theatrical' career and he was so impressed by the other comedians that at one point, he went through a block.

There's a touching anecdote told by his eternal 'wife' actress Claude Gensac who just passed away a few months ago: while incapable to complete a scene, she consoled him, saying, "it was worth it to do this for your mother and not being able to pull it, what if the old lady saw you from up there?" She hit a sensitive chord because De Funès' mother was his main inspiration, and to have that persona, she was a little Spanish woman of volcanic temper who behaved exactly like Donald Duck when she was angry, jumping and screaming. So when De Funès makes duck sounds in the climactic trial, there was no better way to pay the final tribute to his muse and get rid of a few demons.

And seriously, who could inject Disney in Molière without changing the spirit? That's the power of "The Miser", you never can tell if it's Molière's greatness transcended by De Funès' comical power or the opposite, I guess it's a little bit of both: two kings of comedies finally meeting. When the film opens, you have the traditional romantic set-up and the young comedians are all fairly competent, but somewhat, you understand Girault's reluctance to adapt the play by the book, it feels too talkative, too stagy, but once you see Harpagon, it's the miracle. In his first scene in the church, an old woman comes shaking the little purse to take the collection, he pretends to be in such a deep meditation he can't hear her and like a sleepwalker, sneaks his way out of the church while she keeps on shaking, a minute of silent De Funès immediately sets the tone.

And this is why I had to come up with that lengthy introduction of Molière, as iconic as the playwright was, his plays have seldom inspired movies, let alone box-office successes and "The Miser"' is certainly the most successful of all the movies adapted by Molière, so De Funès had to be the special ingredient, surrounded by his old accomplices: Girault, Michel Galabru, Claude Gensac and a few buddies from the 'Gendarme' series. He gave his touch, he knew how to spice up the original material with slapstick and funny uses of props and drawings, I doubt there was such an endlessly long drawer in the 'thief' scene but I'm sure Molière would have inserted it if he could.

There's a bittersweet aspect in the film, it is one of De Funès' last three movies, at a time where he had to moderate his frenetic style of comedy following his cardiac episode. Each film carried a symbolical resonance, some dramatic monologues and a torch passing moment with Jacques Villeret in "The Cabbage Soup" and a final "Gendarme" film, also Girault's final movie before his death. But "The Miser" is De Funès' last comical exploit, where the time of a film, his frail old age magically vanished and he looked almost exactly like his characters of the late 60's. Believe it or not, I've always thought the film was made before his stroke. It's like a rejuvenation boost, a last hurrah at a time where his form of comedy was deemed as obsolete, replaced by the new generation.

De Funès feels young again, because he fulfilled a youth dream, because for one moment, he became his mother's son, because he had so much respect for Molière this was a role he couldn't miss, or simply because the film had a personal value, which is enough a reason to admire, appreciate and enjoy it.

As a huge fan of Louis de Funès, I had high hopes for The Miser, but unfortunately, this adaptation fails to capture his usual charm. The story, based on Molière's classic play, feels overly theatrical and stagnant, with little to keep the audience engaged.

De Funès, known for his high-energy performances, seems constrained by the material, unable to inject his signature comedic flair into the role. The pacing is slow, and the humor often falls flat, making the film feel more like a dull stage production than a lively cinematic experience. While de Funès shines in many other films, The Miser is a rare miss that's difficult to recommend, even for devoted fans.

This person is a star of comedy, truly showing a prowess in the toughest genre, celebrated in France and the world, and so forth. Just this is a video filmed thing which I thought was a TV movie at first, nothing at all that is ok, just that wondering why it just was not filmed on regular film, some of the "sets" look drab and dingy. Otherwise this shows more histrionics from Funes. Also (I watched a version where Russian is being dubbed over and my mom is translating) I am told this is done with a Shakespearean language, which I am ok with this marmalade jargon. But I also like plain spoken lucid usual.

Adapting a literary source to another medium requires some work, it is not just copying it. Molière's play has a brilliant text, but this attempt to translate it to a film keeping the traits of theater was a serious failure. Both in the kind of set (not only simple but explicitly suggesting it is a stage) and in the way of acting (overacting, often campy), the conception of tgis movie is made clear, but it does not work.