Agrega una trama en tu idiomaAttendees at a horror-film convention in San Francisco keep disappearing. It turns out that the guest of honor is a real vampire, and his henchmen are kidnapping the convention guests.Attendees at a horror-film convention in San Francisco keep disappearing. It turns out that the guest of honor is a real vampire, and his henchmen are kidnapping the convention guests.Attendees at a horror-film convention in San Francisco keep disappearing. It turns out that the guest of honor is a real vampire, and his henchmen are kidnapping the convention guests.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
John Cochran
- Scotty
- (as John H. Cochran)
Mark Anger
- The Avenger
- (as Irving Israel)
Michael L. Davis
- Lt. Driscoll
- (as Mike Hitchcock)
Kathleen Quinlan
- Projectionist
- (as Kathy Quinlan)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I figured this was a fairly light-hearted horror/comedy made by and for horror fans, one of which I am.
But about two-thirds of the way through it appeared that somebody thought it would be a good idea to include film -- real film footage -- of one of humanity's greatest real-life horrors, the Holocaust.
I disapprove of that decision because that ghastly footage was being exploited by filmmakers in order to add shock-value to the movie.
After that, there was no way I could take any enjoyment from this film.
Horror movies ought to be escapism and the real horrors of the Holocaust ought not be exploited as they were.
But about two-thirds of the way through it appeared that somebody thought it would be a good idea to include film -- real film footage -- of one of humanity's greatest real-life horrors, the Holocaust.
I disapprove of that decision because that ghastly footage was being exploited by filmmakers in order to add shock-value to the movie.
After that, there was no way I could take any enjoyment from this film.
Horror movies ought to be escapism and the real horrors of the Holocaust ought not be exploited as they were.
This film has a little of everything for fans of horror films, comics, horror conventions,and the like. It has that 70's feel to it and a lot of fun to watch. If your a fan of low budget shockers, it's right up your alley. Just set back on a stormy Saturday night and get ready for a Creature Feature.
I find the above, or below review, depending on where they place this, of not much use. I actually am a horror fan, and I did feel this movie was made for me. This is a bad movie written and directed by horror movie host John Stanley. Of course, probably over 90% of the horror movies I've enjoyed throughout the years are bad movies. If you're not real fan of the genre or just enjoy finding an oddball offbeat piece of crap to watch once in a while, you'll hate this. It's not made for you, anyway. Move on. But pointing out the obvious that this is a bad film seems like standing outside a burning building long after the fire department has arrived and yelling fire. This bad movie is plenty good in my estimation and worth a look from any real horror fan.
This film is hard to find. It was directed by John Stanley who was the horror, science fiction, and fantasy critic for the San Francisco Chronicle for three decades. He also hosted Creature Features TV show in the SF Bay Area. He's the author of THE CREATURE FEATURE MOVIE GUIDE and I WAS A TV HORROR HOST.
The film is tongue-in-cheek horror film about a famous horror actor, noted for playing vampires, coming to a Horror Convention in San Francisco, and turning out to be an actual vampire. There are a lot of in-jokes for horror fans. It's fun. It was an independent film shot on a low budget and it sometime shows. If you a horror fan you will probably get a kick out of it.
The film is tongue-in-cheek horror film about a famous horror actor, noted for playing vampires, coming to a Horror Convention in San Francisco, and turning out to be an actual vampire. There are a lot of in-jokes for horror fans. It's fun. It was an independent film shot on a low budget and it sometime shows. If you a horror fan you will probably get a kick out of it.
Let me start by saying I really love horror movies, and I especially love the old-fashioned vampire type that are supposedly satirized in this film. And I'm not offended by a cherished genre being sent up in good fun. Indeed, I enjoy a good spoof on a genre. But let me tell you, this movie is perfectly awful. The production values rate no better than a D-minus. The sound is so terrible you often cannot understand the dialogue. Unfortunately, when you do hear it, it's usually pretty lame. Following the story is a challenge, too. Entire minutes pass when you are at a loss to know what is happening. I don't know how viewers gave this enough stars to land it over a four-star rating. Take my advice. Hard pass.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaNightmare In Blood was filmed in 1973.
- ConexionesReferences Frankenstein (1931)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Malakay - Incubo di sangue
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 150,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Nightmare in Blood (1977) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda