CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.7/10
9.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Giacinto Mazzatella y su familia participan en robos, prostitución y otras actividades. El gobierno le otorga a Giacinto un millón por la pérdida de su ojo. Ahora su familia lo matará por el... Leer todoGiacinto Mazzatella y su familia participan en robos, prostitución y otras actividades. El gobierno le otorga a Giacinto un millón por la pérdida de su ojo. Ahora su familia lo matará por el dinero.Giacinto Mazzatella y su familia participan en robos, prostitución y otras actividades. El gobierno le otorga a Giacinto un millón por la pérdida de su ojo. Ahora su familia lo matará por el dinero.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 2 nominaciones en total
Opiniones destacadas
10hamn
Just a great film! I think that "Ugly, Dirty an Bad" has more quality than many "Hollywood-made-to-win-Oscars" films. Let's forget by now the humor side of the film; the content brought to the viewer shows as those kind of people try to survive day by day in extreme poverty and illness. Much more than a film to make people laugh, it's a documentary and a "finger-in-wound" in nowadays issues. I hope people after see that movie just don't remember the funniest scenes, but also the human side of the whole story pictured in there. Remember, everywhere we go, even if all around seems to be nice and beauty, somewhere, if we look carefully, we can discover "dark spots"... Recently in an opinion article about another film, in the heading section we could read "[...] Mary, satiated of removing thorns from the rose flowers in local factory [...]" That's the point: there's no roses without thorns! And if you see a rose without them, it's because someone had remove it before...
Almost fifty years later, this hyper-realistic and ruthless portrait of the misery of the slums, the outskirts of the big cities, in the case of the Italian capital, remains alive and impressive, in its visceral rawness.
At the time, Scola, like Pasolini before him, sought, above all, to denounce this suburban misery, as a product of capitalist society and the inequalities it generated. But barely twelve years later, and even before the fall of the Soviet Union and the communist regimes dependent on it, Kusturica filmed the miserable flow of gypsies and other underprivileged people, from socialism, in Yugoslavia, Bulgaria or Romania, towards begging, prostitution and crime, in the Italian slums, in Time of the Gypsies.
Today, it seems clear that this wound, which lasted for most of the second half of the 20th century in Europe, was caused by the massive, internal and external, migration phenomena, that followed the Second World War.
At present, the problem mainly involves south/north migration, to Europe and the United States, which is being attenuated through state intervention, in the temporary accommodation and repatriation of many migrants, not avoiding, even so, dramatic situations, which remind us, sometimes, the misery of post-war Europe.
A social classic, always worth revisiting.
At the time, Scola, like Pasolini before him, sought, above all, to denounce this suburban misery, as a product of capitalist society and the inequalities it generated. But barely twelve years later, and even before the fall of the Soviet Union and the communist regimes dependent on it, Kusturica filmed the miserable flow of gypsies and other underprivileged people, from socialism, in Yugoslavia, Bulgaria or Romania, towards begging, prostitution and crime, in the Italian slums, in Time of the Gypsies.
Today, it seems clear that this wound, which lasted for most of the second half of the 20th century in Europe, was caused by the massive, internal and external, migration phenomena, that followed the Second World War.
At present, the problem mainly involves south/north migration, to Europe and the United States, which is being attenuated through state intervention, in the temporary accommodation and repatriation of many migrants, not avoiding, even so, dramatic situations, which remind us, sometimes, the misery of post-war Europe.
A social classic, always worth revisiting.
(1976) Ugly, Dirty and Bad/ Brutti, sporchi e cattivi
(In Italian with English subtitles)
PSYCHOLOGICAL DRAMA
Although, the movie doesn't have a plot, it does however, introduces us to a family living together in a boarded-like shack in one of the most poorest locations in Italy. It's located high on a hill, near a highway which can be labelled as your average dumping ground. The head of the household is Giacinto Mazzatella (Nino Manfredi) who appears to own this little shack along with his wife and older sons and their kids scrunched, sleeping together on whatever small spaces s/he could find. And each one of the members are throwing hissy fits with one another, especially the head of the household, who is the father. He throws the biggest fit of them all who sleeps with a loaded shotgun beside his bed getting all paranoid, about his bundle of money which he hides it on different locations, wherever he could find. His mother whose like the oldest member of this family does nothing but watch TV, whereas each morning everybody else leaves doing what hoodlums do, which is thieving and loitering. Much of the movie showcases the father with his one good eye grumbling about his no good kids, with the neighbors who clash at them. As we the viewers observe the family squabbles with one another, particularly against the father, it is still fascinating to see how each of them cope with another this long, for although their lifestyle is routine, it's still enough to keep our interests from sticking to them until the very end.
Although, the movie doesn't have a plot, it does however, introduces us to a family living together in a boarded-like shack in one of the most poorest locations in Italy. It's located high on a hill, near a highway which can be labelled as your average dumping ground. The head of the household is Giacinto Mazzatella (Nino Manfredi) who appears to own this little shack along with his wife and older sons and their kids scrunched, sleeping together on whatever small spaces s/he could find. And each one of the members are throwing hissy fits with one another, especially the head of the household, who is the father. He throws the biggest fit of them all who sleeps with a loaded shotgun beside his bed getting all paranoid, about his bundle of money which he hides it on different locations, wherever he could find. His mother whose like the oldest member of this family does nothing but watch TV, whereas each morning everybody else leaves doing what hoodlums do, which is thieving and loitering. Much of the movie showcases the father with his one good eye grumbling about his no good kids, with the neighbors who clash at them. As we the viewers observe the family squabbles with one another, particularly against the father, it is still fascinating to see how each of them cope with another this long, for although their lifestyle is routine, it's still enough to keep our interests from sticking to them until the very end.
9MwwM
I saw parts of the movie when i was a child, today i had the pleasure of having a second chance to see it. I grabbed the opportunity... I'm a person o likes cinema in general, maybe more independent, but keeping the attention on the products of the enterprise... The film is a pungent, powerful blow to the modern society... When it premiered it was also in this condition... But nowadays the film balances between the tragic and the comic gender, with a sensitive eye... Very funny... Extremely dramatic... The ironic look, that scola gives to the foundings of European civilization, the ability to survive, how in extreme conditions (poverty, famine, lack of hygienic conditions) the humans have the capability of preserving values has purity, humor, fantasy
And without being afraid in addressing the darkest side of man, the violent being, the amorality, putting aside the fear of shocking th audience
Etore manages a brilliant timing in managing the drama and the comedy
More would take place in this reflection but I don't want to risk sounding (even more
) pretentious
. One of my favorite movies... Até já... ps: I apologize for the quality of my written English...
10erubies
This is an extraordinary film. A pitiless portrait of human race. Scola describes the life of poor and marginal people with no compassion, showing all their miseries and perfidies. In this sense, the film is very close to another masterpiece, Viridiana from Bunuel. Everything in this movie is so disconcerting (beginning with the slum which has a magnificent vista to St. Peter's Cathedral) that it also remembers me of David Lynch's works. Besides all that, the film is absolutely hilarious.
¿Sabías que…?
- ConexionesFeatured in Zomergasten: Episode #4.3 (1991)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Ugly, Dirty and Bad?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 7,144
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 4,898
- 23 oct 2016
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 7,144
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 55 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the German language plot outline for Sucios, feos y malos (1976)?
Responda