La batalla de Chile: La lucha de un pueblo sin armas - Segunda parte: El golpe de estado
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
8.2/10
1.4 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaFilmmaker Patricio Guzmán tracks the deterioration of Salvador Allende's position following the attempted coup d'état of 29 June 1973, and analyzes the 10 weeks before Augusto Pinochet's CIA... Leer todoFilmmaker Patricio Guzmán tracks the deterioration of Salvador Allende's position following the attempted coup d'état of 29 June 1973, and analyzes the 10 weeks before Augusto Pinochet's CIA-backed seizure of power.Filmmaker Patricio Guzmán tracks the deterioration of Salvador Allende's position following the attempted coup d'état of 29 June 1973, and analyzes the 10 weeks before Augusto Pinochet's CIA-backed seizure of power.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Salvador Allende
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Carlos Altamirano
- Self - Secretario General Partido Socialista
- (material de archivo)
Fernando Castillo
- Self - Rector Universidad Católica Demócratacristiano
- (material de archivo)
Luis Corvalán
- Self - Secretario General Partido Comunista
- (material de archivo)
Juan Cáceres
- Self - Jefe del Comando de Abastecimiento Directo
- (material de archivo)
Víctor García Garzena
- Self - Diputado P. Nacional
- (material de archivo)
Jaime Gazmuri
- Self - Secretario General
- (material de archivo)
Oscar Guillermo Garretón
- Self - Secretario General Partido MAPU
- (material de archivo)
Gustavo Leigh
- Self
- (material de archivo)
- (as General Gustavo Leigh)
César Mendoza
- Self
- (material de archivo)
- (as General César Mendoza)
J. Toribio Merino
- Self
- (material de archivo)
- (as Almirante José Toribio Merino)
Augusto Pinochet
- Self
- (material de archivo)
- (as General Augusto Pinochet)
Alejandro Rojas
- Self - Diputado Comunista
- (material de archivo)
Opiniones destacadas
The Battle of Chile surely must be the most interesting from the Chilean troubles from the 70's, handled with style & fervour by the passionate director, who by all accounts is a left-wing sympathiser. The film starts with a roar with the failed coup d'etat, & from there builds up the tragic story of the Allende lead "Marxist" party, telling us who plotted against them & why, all set behind the backdrop of mass public support, eventually quashed by right-wing terror. The film has to be admired also for publicly stating that the CIA helped the bourguoise eventually kill close to 30,000 people, and the fact that this film was a huge risk to the lives of the makers (who had to smuggle it out of Chile and edit it as exiles). Overall it deals with the worker's plight not only in Chile, but as a case study around the world (Brazil & Bolivia for example), and only watching these types of films (this is part 2 of a trilogy) do you sense the realities of this world, and shake off the ideals set by society. Well worth a watch.
The three "Battle of Chile" films are documentaries that were made in a most unusual way. Actual footage (most black & white 8mm) of the overthrow of the Allende government was made and smuggled out of the country. Then, it was pieced together years later and released in three parts. Now they could have probably shoved it all into one film but by stretching it out, you get a very thorough look at the process. However, because the three films were brought out years apart, there is LOTS of overlap--lots. Unfortunately, because the crackdown on the left was so extreme, you also get little footage of the atrocities--but interviews with families whose members simply disappeared.
Part two does NOT pick up immediately after part one--it more runs in parallel at times. It follows the steps leading from government disunity and an initial coup (that failed) to the successful coup only a short time later.
Even if you are more to the right politically, this is an interesting film (as are the other two), as it's rare to see a film document, through live film, the fall of the government. Plus, although I don't think a communist-socialist government is a very good form of government, it WAS legally elected and you can't feel happy about coups and assassinations. It is compelling and makes me, as an American, feel a big sad about our now admitted involvement in toppling the government. And, because it challenges me, I felt it more interesting than a film about something with which I already heartily agree. Well worth seeing as a very interesting history lesson.
Part two does NOT pick up immediately after part one--it more runs in parallel at times. It follows the steps leading from government disunity and an initial coup (that failed) to the successful coup only a short time later.
Even if you are more to the right politically, this is an interesting film (as are the other two), as it's rare to see a film document, through live film, the fall of the government. Plus, although I don't think a communist-socialist government is a very good form of government, it WAS legally elected and you can't feel happy about coups and assassinations. It is compelling and makes me, as an American, feel a big sad about our now admitted involvement in toppling the government. And, because it challenges me, I felt it more interesting than a film about something with which I already heartily agree. Well worth seeing as a very interesting history lesson.
¿Sabías que…?
- Citas
Salvador Allende: History is ours, and the people make it to build a better society.
- ConexionesEdited into Salvador Allende (2004)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- The Battle of Chile: Part II
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 28 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was La batalla de Chile: La lucha de un pueblo sin armas - Segunda parte: El golpe de estado (1976) officially released in India in English?
Responda