Misión Marte

Greetings And Salutations, and welcome to my review of Mission Mars; here's the breakdown of my ratings:

Story: 1.25 Direction: 1.00 Pace: 0.75 Acting: 1.25 Enjoyment: 1.25

TOTAL: 5.50 out of 10.00

Mission Mars is your atypical B-Movie on a budget: And a severe one at that. There is much to dislike, especially if you're looking for flawlessness. But should you be like me and a tad more forgiving and understanding, then some of the film's downfalls may find a warm place in your heart and memory. For me, it was the rocket ships. I'll get into that in more detail later.

The plot is your basic race-to-the-stars storyline. Man still had yet to land on the moon when this picture came out. But here, we find the race between the Russian Cosmonauts and the American Astronauts is to get from the Earth and to Mars first. What usually drives a story such as this is characterisation. Since we are to spend a lot of time with these space explorers, it's the ideal way to get to know them. And once we relate to them and their situations, when the action and mysterious events begin, we find ourselves in their corner and cheering them on. And the screenwriter Michael St Clair does an admirable job of this. We get to know the crew, Col. Blaiswick - an easy leader of men - a thoughtful problem solver, Nick Grant - a geologist who is unafraid to put himself above the mission and his colleagues, and Doug Duncan - Second in command and as logical and practical as his commander. Luckily, these three have a good relationship, which makes the long journey to the red planet an easy star trek. Their conversations are credible and believable. Most hold a hint of humour and warmheartedness, which propels a positive feeling toward the audience. In this day and age of bleakness, it was nice to feel upbeat watching a movie, and it's the main reason I'm reviewing older films - they're not as dire as today's box office. Sadly, due to the low budget and monetary hindrances in filmmaking, it would have been advisable to make the story as strong as possible. Had St. Clair carried his individual characteristics into the unknown and possibly deadly alien orb, it would have added more power to the Sci-Fi tale. Sadly he doesn't, and the story begins to falter when it should become intriguing.

It doesn't help that the special effects are shoddy due to the lack of budget. As I said above, the spaceships are fantastic, but for the wrong reasons. As a kid, I watched Blue Peter, and I remember a section where they put together a couple of Space Rockets. These were cobbled together from washing-up bottles and the ubiquitous sticky-backed plastic. And the ships in Mission Mars look precisely like Blue Peter's creations. So I had a tinge of nostalgia every time I saw them. But better yet, was the Mars landing vehicle, which appeared to be a Campbell's soup can - enter remembrances of Andy Warhol. However, I cannot reminisce about the alien orb. The first time I saw it, it didn't look too awful. I even liked the abstract shape of the orb's security monitor - at least the special effects team was getting inventive. However, later in the movie, when we watch Grant walk into the sphere, it's less impressive - The special effects crew swapped the crystalline orb for a fluffy white ball with a painted black oval, representing an open doorway. And worse comes when Grant reaches the alien object, for we realise the sphere isn't as large and ominous as previously thought. No! It's not much taller than Grant as he needs to duck down to enter. And let's not get started on our astronaut's spaceship's controls or fittings. Nevertheless, even with the poor special effects, the director, Nicholas Webster, does the best with what he's given. His strongest scenes are the ones containing the performers. He knows how to frame them for the best results and appears to know how to get the most from them.

The cast is the best thing about this movie. Darren McGavin, who went on to portray Kolchak, gives a strong performance as Col. Blaiswick. He adds power, drive, and conviction to the role. And the rest of the cast is just as believable and credible in their performances.

I wouldn't highly recommend Mission Mars to anyone. At best, it's a Lazy Sunday Afternoon flick - a movie you can doze off while watching and not regret missing anything. And if you stay awake, you should enjoy it enough to realise it was worth your while. But it is only for the Sci-Fi fans that like and prefer Ye Olde Space Travel Movies. And should anyone out there remember the Blue Peter washing up bottle spaceships, give Mission Mars a look-see and let the nostalgia wash over you.

Now, fire up those boosters, and let's get off this damned red planet because you have to check out my The Final Frontier list to see where I ranked Mission Mars.

Take Care & Stay Well.

I came across this film after watching a TV episode of Hondo that featured Nick Adams as the Apache Kid, a Native American killer on the run, killing anyone that crosses his path regardless of skin color. This sparked my interest in seeing more of his final roles. I liked watching Nick as a kid doing Japanese monster movie flicks 1965's "Godzilla vs. Monster Zero" and "Frankenstein Conquers the World," but my favorite role of his that I've seen was as Homer, the Polish displaced person in the Steve McQueen WWII 1962 action film "Hell is for Heroes." The fact that he died in 1968, in his mid-30s of an prescription overdose (with disputed motives, the death certificate lists "accident; suicide; undetermined") and was friends with people like Elvis, James Dean and Robert Conrad, give anything he is in much more interest to me than if he had lived and done a ton of low budget films and TV over a long life. As it is, Nick who died in Feb. 1968, is listed in 3 films and a TV show for 1968, so he was a pretty busy actor. This is about the last thing Nick was in and its on Youtube so I wanted to check it out after watching him in Hondo (his 5th to last credit) wearing a ridiculous amount of dark make up (and a long black wig). I have to say that I have watched many dozens of old sci-fi films, some being unwatchable by today's standards but I usually enjoy them for their low budget and bad acting and scripts, so I will say that Mission Mars was fun for me to watch all the way through. My wife also watched it with me, so she was entertained and she is not a low budget film fan like me. The film, to me, is not to be taken too literally, one needs a dose of suspension of belief with any space film. The same year Mission to Mars was released, 2001: A Space Odyssey was released (two months apart), and as great as that film is, one needs a suspension of belief because that's not real either! I watched Mission Mars as more a fantasy sci-fi film than as a true depiction of space travel. I also think that this film is different than other low budget sci-fi films of the same time like The Doomsday Machine in that it has art film elements in it with quick edit sequences using hip music, so the film is really trying to be different than the standard 1960s Sunday matinee film for 10 year olds. Take for instance the opening titles with a smooth rock song playing transitioning to a cool intro sequence, very different than the standard sci-fi film which is usually some synth "space" tones playing with a star backdrop. I enjoyed the catchy tune so much I looked it up on Youtube alone and someone posted it for me to enjoy again later! Further research says that Motown producer Hal Davis (The Jackson Five) formed the musical group The Forum Quorum (a soul sounding rock group with white teens) and that they released a full album (info available if you search for it)! Other music used included jazz beats like bongos, so they were trying to separate this film from just another low budget action film. A lot seems to be written about the use of motorcycle helmets being used as space helmets (thanks for the personal review with details into why that happened!), I say that if you are watching this kind of film you are missing out on a lot more realism than that and again (the stock footage of different rockets launching should clue one in), the suspension of belief factor needs to be high to really enjoy this film. The aliens are done artistically as well as opposed to a Roger Corman film, this American film has many elements of style that one would see in a 1960s Japanese, Italian, or Eastern European space film, I was enjoying it. Remember what Kubrick used for alien life in 2001:ASO? A still monolith with deep vocal tones playing? You see what happened there, suspension of belief? Going back to Nick Adams, he looks like he's going bald here, he clearly looks like he's starting to age rapidly on screen, sad. I did enjoy his performance though in that it was about his last and this was all I would ever get. Besides my interest in Nick Adams, Darren McGavin of The Night Stalker fame also stars in this film. So, you have two very famous cult actors together in a cheap sci-fi film, this is nerd heaven. Other cast tie in's are that this is the same director that did Santa Claus Conquers the Martians and the same producer that did The Fat Spy, two other cult films. Despite its low budget, Mission Mars sets itself apart in its execution and is highly recommended for fans of McGavin and Adams. 7 of 10. RIP Nick.

Don't let poor reviews scare you off any movie. All movies have some value to someone. For example, this was one of my childhood memories. I'm 46 now and have waited almost 40 years to find this and finally I have it. I am thrilled. Any poor effects or dated look or whatever are inconsequential to me. I was really excited to see it again. And I feel the same way about several other movies, and I'm sure everyone has movies they feel that way about. Don't take it all these movies so seriously! Some are just plain fun, and certainly a reminder of more innocent times. So enjoy, no matter how silly it may seem by today's standards.

The year: 1968. The movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" sets new technological and intellectual standards in the SF genre. Likewise 1968: The movie "Mission Mars" sets new standards of daftness and technological incompetence in the SF genre. The unsuitable, excruciating title song "No More Tears", sung by Sturg Pardalis (sic!) and played by "The Forum Quorum", already makes you fear the worst. The film introduces us then to the personal and family problems of three astronauts who are chosen to fly to Mars. After this long (very long) intro and lots of Nasa stock footage the movie really gets nonsensical. The "spaceship" is nothing more than a slightly altered tin-can, the helmets of the space suits are open beneath the chin, and the scenes on "Mars" were shot on a very small sound stage without the illusion of a horizon. While Darren McGavin carries this whole nonsense with remarkable seriousness, Nick Adams seems not to be very happy with his part in this trash. "Mission Mars" is a low budget movie better suited for the 50s, but without the charm of most of the SF movies of this period. It's theatrical, third-rate and was already very dated when it was produced.

Like other reviewers on this page, I have a special place in my heart for this cheesy movie. I just re-watched the DVD, and I have to agree that it's best to just skip forward to the post-launch space adventures, and get on with it.

What I like best is the weird design of the Polarite. Yes, the effect itself is low-tech, but the basic design is really cool... it's like a Wally Wood creation right off the pages of a 1950's EC comic such as Weird Science.

The most frustrating element for me was the constant distraction of the hokey, form-fitting "long john" space suits worn by the astronauts, when they are out and about on the Martian surface. Do we really need to see the bulge of their private parts, along with the tell-tale outlines of their jockey underwear? Good grief...