CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.3/10
3.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaMan tries to recover a horse stolen from him by a Mexican bandit.Man tries to recover a horse stolen from him by a Mexican bandit.Man tries to recover a horse stolen from him by a Mexican bandit.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 1 nominación en total
Emilio Fernández
- Lazaro
- (as Emilio Fernandez)
Argentina Brunetti
- Yaqui Woman
- (sin créditos)
Debra Domasin
- Paquita
- (sin créditos)
Abel Fernandez
- Mexican Farmer
- (sin créditos)
Raven Grey Eagle
- Minor Role
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I caught this on television and loved it. It's Brando's spaghetti western. Lots of fantastic landscapes. close-ups and acting. Not very violent, but extremely effective. Great soundtrack, would be awesome in surround, but mono track was terrific. John Saxon was a great bad guy ( a Mexican, no less) and character actors are authentic. Well worth seeing. Sidney J. Furie shows real skill as a director even though he was only thirty three at the time. There's elements of John Ford, Howard Hawkes and Sergio Leone. Sometimes it was hard to buy Brando in this role, it's more an Eastwood type of role, but he's such a great actor that he becomes convincing. John Saxon playing a Mexican bandit is a terrific performance, even though it's a white guy playing a Mexican. Hollywood at it's best.
E.Forster Toronto, Canada
E.Forster Toronto, Canada
This film seems to be caught between the 1950s western movies and the Spaghetti Westerns later in the 60s. While the 1950s hero drawn into conflict was 'minding his own business and wanted to be left alone', once crossed the bad guy found he woke a sleeping giant. Perhaps this style was how America saw itself after Pearl Harbor.
"The Appaloosa", on the other hand, has a different style. While Brando was minding his business before being drawn into conflict, the theft of his horse occurs while he is drunk and unable handle the situation, and he seems to be inept. It is a long scene and one that ends in humiliation for Brando's character. Even if a 1950s hero was caught off guard while being drunk, he wasn't humiliated. A 1950s hero would not appear inept, just that he had made a mistake that allowed the bad guy to get the upper hand.
There are other instances in the film where Brando's character doesn't act as a 1950s hero: his ridiculous Mexican accent, his initial plan at the gang's hideout to leave with his horse, his arm-wrestling scene, his reluctance to take revenge. Brando's character was more in style of the 60s make-the-hero-more-realistic and less larger-than-life. He doesn't win all the battles. There is nothing wrong with this, as long as you interested in watching this.
I was fine with it. I did like the final gun battle as it was different from the usual face-to-face shootout.
I had problems with Brando's mumbling. His character didn't seem laconic, but someone who couldn't express himself. While he did have some good lines, other times he seemed to ramble.
The "in disguise at the bar" scene should have been cut. The conversation left me confused and the fake Mexican accent was irritating. This scene only served to introduce one of the outlaw gang members and could have been done another way.
I enjoyed the scenery, that Brando's character was a religious man without it being central to the movie, his intelligence in the final gun battle, and the motivations being believable for the conflict: the bad guy's pride and standing before his gang, and Brando's need for this horse in his future plans.
"The Appaloosa", on the other hand, has a different style. While Brando was minding his business before being drawn into conflict, the theft of his horse occurs while he is drunk and unable handle the situation, and he seems to be inept. It is a long scene and one that ends in humiliation for Brando's character. Even if a 1950s hero was caught off guard while being drunk, he wasn't humiliated. A 1950s hero would not appear inept, just that he had made a mistake that allowed the bad guy to get the upper hand.
There are other instances in the film where Brando's character doesn't act as a 1950s hero: his ridiculous Mexican accent, his initial plan at the gang's hideout to leave with his horse, his arm-wrestling scene, his reluctance to take revenge. Brando's character was more in style of the 60s make-the-hero-more-realistic and less larger-than-life. He doesn't win all the battles. There is nothing wrong with this, as long as you interested in watching this.
I was fine with it. I did like the final gun battle as it was different from the usual face-to-face shootout.
I had problems with Brando's mumbling. His character didn't seem laconic, but someone who couldn't express himself. While he did have some good lines, other times he seemed to ramble.
The "in disguise at the bar" scene should have been cut. The conversation left me confused and the fake Mexican accent was irritating. This scene only served to introduce one of the outlaw gang members and could have been done another way.
I enjoyed the scenery, that Brando's character was a religious man without it being central to the movie, his intelligence in the final gun battle, and the motivations being believable for the conflict: the bad guy's pride and standing before his gang, and Brando's need for this horse in his future plans.
"The Appaloosa" is a superior low-key western with a great performance by Marlon Brando and very good ones by John Saxon and Anjanette Comer. Brando plays a white man raised by Mexicans who returns from the Civil War tired of killing and ready to build a ranch around one Appaloosa stallion. Brando has the misfortune of becoming a tool for Comer to escape the clutches of Saxon. Saxon retaliates by stealing Brando's stallion, and Brando follows Saxon into Mexico to reclaim it. Director Sidney J. Furie ("The Ipcress File," "Iron Eagle") extensively uses extreme close-ups of faces, in the same manner as Sergio Leone, but not for the same purpose. Furie uses these close-ups to establish intimacy between the characters and the audience. This works beautifully in "The Appaloosa," particularly so since the story is so unremarkable and low-key and Brando's character is by no means a superman. Most of the violence is of the "G" rated variety, with the notable exception of a hand-wrestling contest played with the addition of scorpions.
While the ending of "The Appaloosa" is as abrupt and unremarkable as everything that precedes, intimate moments in the movie linger long after. As examples:
o Brando's confessional o The little girl telling Brando he smells like a goat o The goat herder telling Brando about Saxon's gunmen killing his pet goat o Comer telling Brando her fate if he doesn't help her escape Saxon o The hand-wrestling contest
There are many more unremarkable but somehow memorable moments in the sublime "Appaloosa." It is too insignificant to be great, but it most certainly very good. I give "The Appaloosa" an "8".
While the ending of "The Appaloosa" is as abrupt and unremarkable as everything that precedes, intimate moments in the movie linger long after. As examples:
o Brando's confessional o The little girl telling Brando he smells like a goat o The goat herder telling Brando about Saxon's gunmen killing his pet goat o Comer telling Brando her fate if he doesn't help her escape Saxon o The hand-wrestling contest
There are many more unremarkable but somehow memorable moments in the sublime "Appaloosa." It is too insignificant to be great, but it most certainly very good. I give "The Appaloosa" an "8".
I rate this mid-60's Brando Western a 6, but it really wasn't accepted at the time. Marlon is incredible as always, Anjanette Comer is a stone fox, great supporting cast, and John Saxon as Chuy Medina is a worthy adversary to taunt Brando. Beautiful Southwest and Mexican terrain in this Sidney J. Furie flick that is well worth the trip. Similar to Joe Kidd (also with Saxon).
Best performance = Marlon Brando. Westerns of this type were on their way out by 1966, but with Brando it still makes the grade. Rafael Campos is believable as always in the most authentic way. This one is easy to find so give it a shot!
Best performance = Marlon Brando. Westerns of this type were on their way out by 1966, but with Brando it still makes the grade. Rafael Campos is believable as always in the most authentic way. This one is easy to find so give it a shot!
The Appaloosa (1966)
** (out of 4)
Rather bizarre Western has Matt (Marlon Brando) having his horse stolen by Chuy (John Saxon) so he sets out to get him back. The two men had previous run-ins over a woman (Anjanette Comer) who will come into play as the story plays out.
THE APPALOOSA is a film that Marlon Brando didn't really want to make but the paycheck was good so he took the role. When production started he realized that he really didn't want to do the film so the shooting was somewhat of a disaster with the legend battling director Sidney J. Furie. The end result is a fairly forgettable film that tries to be something different than your typical Western.
The biggest problem with this movie is the story. In all honesty even by Western standards the story here is quite weak and would barely fill up one of those 50 minute "B" films from the 30s. We basically have the two men running into each other a couple time and the film tries to be psychological and it fails pretty bad. There are really bizarre and weird camera set-ups that are meant to be deep or to bring you into the mental state of the characters but it just doesn't work. Whatever vision director Furie was trying to bring just doesn't come across and we're left with a pretty boring movie.
The always entertaining Saxon manages to be the best thing here. With his thick Mexican accent and the paint on his face, Saxon manages to make for a fun villain but it's too bad more wasn't done with the character. I thought Corner was also good in her wasted role and especially early on when she fears for her safety after trying to break free from Chuy. As for Brando, I don't think he's bad here but it's certainly not into what he's doing. He ends up mumbling more than anything else and just doesn't bring any energy or passion to the part.
** (out of 4)
Rather bizarre Western has Matt (Marlon Brando) having his horse stolen by Chuy (John Saxon) so he sets out to get him back. The two men had previous run-ins over a woman (Anjanette Comer) who will come into play as the story plays out.
THE APPALOOSA is a film that Marlon Brando didn't really want to make but the paycheck was good so he took the role. When production started he realized that he really didn't want to do the film so the shooting was somewhat of a disaster with the legend battling director Sidney J. Furie. The end result is a fairly forgettable film that tries to be something different than your typical Western.
The biggest problem with this movie is the story. In all honesty even by Western standards the story here is quite weak and would barely fill up one of those 50 minute "B" films from the 30s. We basically have the two men running into each other a couple time and the film tries to be psychological and it fails pretty bad. There are really bizarre and weird camera set-ups that are meant to be deep or to bring you into the mental state of the characters but it just doesn't work. Whatever vision director Furie was trying to bring just doesn't come across and we're left with a pretty boring movie.
The always entertaining Saxon manages to be the best thing here. With his thick Mexican accent and the paint on his face, Saxon manages to make for a fun villain but it's too bad more wasn't done with the character. I thought Corner was also good in her wasted role and especially early on when she fears for her safety after trying to break free from Chuy. As for Brando, I don't think he's bad here but it's certainly not into what he's doing. He ends up mumbling more than anything else and just doesn't bring any energy or passion to the part.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAccording to co-star John Saxon, Marlon Brando's relationship with director Sidney J. Furie got to the point where Brando, when getting ready to do a close-up, would be reading a book. He would only lower the book when Furie yelled "Action." When he yelled "Cut," Brando would raise the book again. According to Peter Manso's book on Brando, however, Brando and Furie met years later. Brando was quoted to have said, "I thought you were a no-good double-crosser, and I didn't know if I could trust you, but I saw the film and you have the great sense of the best visual directors. Let's do another movie together." Furie, according to the book, replied, "Never!" Furie, for his part, claims that they only came to blows once on the entire shoot of The Appaloosa (1966).
- ErroresThe Appaloosa which portrays the title character was actually a registered Appaloosa stallion named Cojo Rojo. He was born in 1960 and just prior to being used for the film he was racing on the California tracks. He sired several foals, including several race champions. During filming a few other similarly marked horses were used as stunt horses, but the majority of work was done by Cojo Rojo.
- Citas
[first lines]
Priest: Madam.
[enters confessional booth]
Matt Fletcher: I'm having a little trouble getting started, Father.
Priest: You are in the House of God now, my son. Speak from your heart.
Matt Fletcher: Well, I've done a lot of killin'. I've killed a lot of men and sinned a lot of women. But the men I killed needed killin' and the women wanted sinnin', and well, I never was one much to argue.
- ConexionesReferenced in Enemigo al acecho (2001)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Appaloosa?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 38 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was The Appaloosa (1966) officially released in India in English?
Responda