CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.7/10
1.4 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaAn epic story of shattered lives of the Don Cossacks through chaos of World War I, the Russian Revolution, and the following Civil War.An epic story of shattered lives of the Don Cossacks through chaos of World War I, the Russian Revolution, and the following Civil War.An epic story of shattered lives of the Don Cossacks through chaos of World War I, the Russian Revolution, and the following Civil War.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Daniil Ilchenko
- Panteleimon Prokofyevich Melekhov
- (as D. Ilchenko)
Anastasia Filippova
- Ilyinichna - maty
- (as A. Filippova)
Pyotr Glebov
- Grigoriy Melekhov
- (as P. Glebov)
Nikolai Smirnov
- Pyotr Melekhov
- (as N. Smirnov)
Lyudmila Khityaeva
- Dariya - zhena Melekhova
- (as L. Khityayeva)
Natalya Arkhangelskaya
- Dunyashka Melekhova
- (as N. Arkhangelskaya)
Aleksandr Blagovestov
- Stepan Lekatov
- (as A. Blagovestov)
Elina Bystritskaya
- Aksiniya
- (as E. Bystritskaya)
Aleksandr Zhukov
- Miron Koshevoy
- (as A. Zhukov)
Aleksandra Denisova
- Lukinichna
- (as A. Denisova)
Zinaida Kirienko
- Natalya Melekhova
- (as Z. Kiriyenko)
Boris Novikov
- Mitka Korshunov
- (as B. Novikov)
Aleksandr Karpov
- ded Grishaka
- (as A. Karpov)
Yelena Maksimova
- maty Koshevogo
- (as Ye. Maksimova)
Gennadi Karyakin
- Mikhail Koshevoy
- (as G. Karyakin)
Valentina Khmara
- Mashutka Koshevaya
- (as V. Khmara)
Pyotr Chernov
- Ilya Bunchuk
- (as P. Chernov)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I would highly recommend this film to anyone that is interested in Cossack history and culture and/or early Soviet history. However, if you don't already have an interest in these areas, you will likely find the films very slow and boring. All three parts take some patience to watch due to their length and pacing, especially the first part which really isn't all that exciting and is more of a soap opera as others have mentioned.
A couple bits of advice for the foreign/western viewer:
1. The first part may not be as exciting as the last two, but it introduces you to all the characters in the film and fleshes out their relations to each other. To get the most out of the parts 2 and 3, it is important to make an effort to put names to faces and note how each character is related to each other.
2. The films were made for audiences that already had some knowledge of Cossacks and this period in history (WWI, Russian revolution, and the civil war). There are scenes that take place in parts 2 and 3 that no background information is given on, and if you are not familiar with the history will be somewhat confusing. It is highly recommended that one do a little reading online on Cossack history during this period before viewing this miniseries. It would also help to have a basic understanding of Russian revolution and subsequent civil war.
A couple bits of advice for the foreign/western viewer:
1. The first part may not be as exciting as the last two, but it introduces you to all the characters in the film and fleshes out their relations to each other. To get the most out of the parts 2 and 3, it is important to make an effort to put names to faces and note how each character is related to each other.
2. The films were made for audiences that already had some knowledge of Cossacks and this period in history (WWI, Russian revolution, and the civil war). There are scenes that take place in parts 2 and 3 that no background information is given on, and if you are not familiar with the history will be somewhat confusing. It is highly recommended that one do a little reading online on Cossack history during this period before viewing this miniseries. It would also help to have a basic understanding of Russian revolution and subsequent civil war.
The film contains 3 parts, each of which is close to 2 hours.
Here are what I like: 1. This film accurately depicted an agricultural society before the industrial revolution. People used oil lamps. Most people were not well educated. There was no sliced bread. You need to slice bread when you eat. People ate potato, bread, drank milk and soup. There were no in-door plumbing.
2. People's psyches were also very typical of a pre-industrial society. Everyone in the Cossack community were Orthodox Christian. The basic moral fiber was well and strong. Multi-generations lived in a large household. Young people were hooked up by marriage brokers. Young people needed family patriarch's blessing before they could marry.
In other words, you would feel people's psyches and the society at large were very much like the Chinese society before China felt the impact of industrial revolution.
I felt very familiar with the characters and their surroundings. In fact, I felt the men and women were so intimate to me, that I felt really strongly about their joy, anxiety, and anguish.
3. Politics was a central theme in this movie. The novel and the film did a great job in depicting the reality of Russia during the tumultuous years of War World I and the Civil War following the Boshevik revolution.
4. Watching the film, I hated the communists who pretended to be pacifists during War World I, and then showed their ugly face by pushing the country into a 3-year long extremely bloody civil war after War World I ended.
5. Overall, the protagonist, Grigory Melekhov, is a freedom loving, traditionalist with a humanist world view. The communists had the inhumane view of class warfare, and were power mongers.
6. It is amazing that the movie makers were able to make the movie without a single brush of communist propaganda. The movie didn't villanize either side. Nor did it promote, or aggrandize either side.
7. I didn't read the novel. It was said that the adaptation to film lost the richness of the novel. On the basis of the film, I'd say the story structure is a very good epic structure.
8. It is a very dramatic and moving story. With a lot of colorful characters, with rich and interesting characterizations.
9. The 4th DVD contains special features. There were an interview with Ellina Bystritskaya who played Aksinya and an interview with Zinaida Kirienko who played Natalya. Both interviews were done in 2002, I believe. They are quite interesting.
Here are what I felt could be better: 10. There is a soap opera feeling to the film. The characters are not very deep.
11. There were many drinking and eating scenes, which became repetitive.
12. The ending is not satisfactory. The novel was originally circulated in 1928, under Stalin's regime. It would have been banned in Soviet Union if it had a satisfactory ending to my taste. So, I really don't expect more.
13. All characters were quick at saying negative things, and none were good at saying positive things.
Here are what I like: 1. This film accurately depicted an agricultural society before the industrial revolution. People used oil lamps. Most people were not well educated. There was no sliced bread. You need to slice bread when you eat. People ate potato, bread, drank milk and soup. There were no in-door plumbing.
2. People's psyches were also very typical of a pre-industrial society. Everyone in the Cossack community were Orthodox Christian. The basic moral fiber was well and strong. Multi-generations lived in a large household. Young people were hooked up by marriage brokers. Young people needed family patriarch's blessing before they could marry.
In other words, you would feel people's psyches and the society at large were very much like the Chinese society before China felt the impact of industrial revolution.
I felt very familiar with the characters and their surroundings. In fact, I felt the men and women were so intimate to me, that I felt really strongly about their joy, anxiety, and anguish.
3. Politics was a central theme in this movie. The novel and the film did a great job in depicting the reality of Russia during the tumultuous years of War World I and the Civil War following the Boshevik revolution.
4. Watching the film, I hated the communists who pretended to be pacifists during War World I, and then showed their ugly face by pushing the country into a 3-year long extremely bloody civil war after War World I ended.
5. Overall, the protagonist, Grigory Melekhov, is a freedom loving, traditionalist with a humanist world view. The communists had the inhumane view of class warfare, and were power mongers.
6. It is amazing that the movie makers were able to make the movie without a single brush of communist propaganda. The movie didn't villanize either side. Nor did it promote, or aggrandize either side.
7. I didn't read the novel. It was said that the adaptation to film lost the richness of the novel. On the basis of the film, I'd say the story structure is a very good epic structure.
8. It is a very dramatic and moving story. With a lot of colorful characters, with rich and interesting characterizations.
9. The 4th DVD contains special features. There were an interview with Ellina Bystritskaya who played Aksinya and an interview with Zinaida Kirienko who played Natalya. Both interviews were done in 2002, I believe. They are quite interesting.
Here are what I felt could be better: 10. There is a soap opera feeling to the film. The characters are not very deep.
11. There were many drinking and eating scenes, which became repetitive.
12. The ending is not satisfactory. The novel was originally circulated in 1928, under Stalin's regime. It would have been banned in Soviet Union if it had a satisfactory ending to my taste. So, I really don't expect more.
13. All characters were quick at saying negative things, and none were good at saying positive things.
There's something about Russian films made around this time which are simply brilliant. 6 hours pass very quickly. Pure Genius
This is how old time well done propaganda was made, with emotion, with history, with characters wearing their hearts on the outside, with a story that binds the good and the bad in myriad ways, taking the viewer through all the mistakes one could think of doing in relationship with challenging the totalitarian party, and then learning how the "right ways".
The story feels real, even though, for myself, coming from a communist country, it is clearly plastic fantastic, but it represents the idealistic expectations of how to have the community behave in relationship to the party ideals.
All in all, one should watch it, immerse in it, but not lose the sight of a propaganda product. But very well done.
The story feels real, even though, for myself, coming from a communist country, it is clearly plastic fantastic, but it represents the idealistic expectations of how to have the community behave in relationship to the party ideals.
All in all, one should watch it, immerse in it, but not lose the sight of a propaganda product. But very well done.
This is a 6 hour flick of three episodes.
1 Pre WW1, the way of life,the lives and loves
of the rural Cossack village.
2 Mobilization, WW1, defeat
3 The end of WW1, revolution,chaos, civil war, changing fortunes, Bolshevik Victory. The turbulence of Cossack life during this time.A bit of propaganda,but who cares?
This is the Russian Gone With the Wind.As good and maybe better. A vanished world. I had
seen it before,but this adaptation was better.Maybe the other was edited different or the subtitles are better? The flow of the story was better.Several characters from the home village appear again and again during the film. The main character is Grigory, a young rather wild Cossack, his next door married lover, his family selected wife.His large family gets a lot of time in this.A rather boring life is soon interrupted by war,revolution,counter revolution , Bolsheviks, white Russians,bandits and Communists. As things change, Grigory switches sides, his family and the Cossacks way of life is ruined. He loses everything. Well filmed,well acted,excellently scored, a cast of thousands.A classic Russian epic. Well worth watching. Epic War, history and love.You can't beat the combination.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaOriginal Russian film is 340 minutes long (film length 9,582 m). It was reduced to 107 minutes for international distribution.
- ConexionesFeatured in Zhizn odna... (1987)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Quiet Flows the Don?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 5h 30min(330 min)
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta