[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Atrás
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
Loco por Jerry (1965)

Opiniones de usuarios

Loco por Jerry

5 opiniones
4/10

Crushingly disappointing...

... even as a small child I knew the difference between these later attempts at the Tom and Jerry format and the peak years of the Quimby productions.

The artwork is scratchier, less fluid, and there's a notable lack of kinetic flow to the violence. The best Tom and Jerry cartoons had them using objects around them to inflict greater and more surreal pain on one another... here the cartoon focuses on the objects themselves, such as a toy train, at the expense of some cat on mouse ultraviolence. Even when we do see the physical assaults the two lay on each other, it's tempered with a more realistic coding... Tom's extended tail lasting for several frames, for example, rather than being immediately shook off.

Most of it is just inexplicably mediocre, a substandard calibre of which you can't quite put your finger on. But a lot of it is to do with charm, and whereas the original series could sometimes get too self-consciously cute, this one tries to be post-modern, with Tom's gazes to the viewer a distraction.

Ultimately, there's no pace, flow or even soul to this one. It's just a series of uninvolving set-pieces, with an inexplicable ending that neither resolves the story adequately or amuses. Stick to stuff like Cue Ball Cat (1950)... you'll be glad you did.
  • The_Movie_Cat
  • 13 abr 2006
  • Enlace permanente
8/10

This is yet another light-h-e-a-r-t-e-d masterpiece . . .

  • pixrox1
  • 5 nov 2022
  • Enlace permanente
4/10

The Roadrunner: Variations on a Theme (Urban)

There are people who consider the Wile E. Coyote/roadrunner shorts that Chuck Jones did for Warner Brothers to be his best series. Certainly, as a demonstration that silent cartoons still had some appeal, they do work.... but their inherent limitation as a variation on a simple theme bores me after a while.

In the middle 1960s, Chuck Jones did several Tom-and-Jerry cartoons and in this one, they play Wile E. Coyote (Tom) and the roadrunner (Jerry). The distinction here is that the setting is urban, rather than the southwestern desert that the roadrunner lives in -- a Krazy Kat sort of environment.

Most of this takes place in a department store, where the usual Acme products are available. The net result is mediocre.
  • boblipton
  • 25 oct 2002
  • Enlace permanente
4/10

One of the weaker Tom and Jerry cartoons

I say this with a heavy heart, but I was very disappointed in this cartoon. I really wanted to like it, but a lot of it was severely lacking. The good things were seeing Tom and Jerry, who are still likable enough, and the soundtrack. Everything else didn't work. The animation lacks fluidity and is very scratchy and lacking in vibrancy. The story is predictable, while the ending is abrupt and doesn't resolve the story very well. The sight gags are not very funny either, not helped by the predictable story, while the cartoon is too short and too fast as well. So overall, a major disappointment, not Tom and Jerry's very worst but sorry I don't recommend it. 4/10 Bethany Cox
  • TheLittleSongbird
  • 8 jul 2010
  • Enlace permanente
4/10

I'm not wild about this T&J caper.

Tom is chasing Jerry, who leads the cat into a toy store where chaos ensues.

A toy shop: in the old days of T&J, this scenario would have offered lots of potential for hilarity, but this being a '60s Chuck Jones effort, the result is disappointing to say the least. Charmless animation, unimaginative gags, and an overall feeling of a wasted opportunity.

The repetitive joke where Tom is run over by a train is a recycled Wile.E.Coyote moment, and what kind of toy shop keeps a mallet display? Jones also seems to have no ability (here at least) to add a feeling of momentum to either his characters or the falling objects that inevitably land on Tom's head.
  • BA_Harrison
  • 28 may 2017
  • Enlace permanente

Más de este título

Más para explorar

Visto recientemente

Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
Para Android e iOS
Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
  • Ayuda
  • Índice del sitio
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licencia de datos de IMDb
  • Sala de prensa
  • Publicidad
  • Trabaja con nosotros
  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.