Fanny Hill

1964
GP
1h 44min

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaYoung, pretty and innocent Fanny Hill has lost her parents and must find her way in life amidst the perils of turbulent 18th century London. She is fortunate enough to find rapidly a place a... Leer todoYoung, pretty and innocent Fanny Hill has lost her parents and must find her way in life amidst the perils of turbulent 18th century London. She is fortunate enough to find rapidly a place as chambermaid of the effusive Mrs. Brown. Mrs. Brown lives in a large house teeming with f... Leer todoYoung, pretty and innocent Fanny Hill has lost her parents and must find her way in life amidst the perils of turbulent 18th century London. She is fortunate enough to find rapidly a place as chambermaid of the effusive Mrs. Brown. Mrs. Brown lives in a large house teeming with female "relatives" in négligée and with very relaxed manners. She also insists that Fanny m... Leer todo

Dirección
- Russ Meyer
- Albert Zugsmith
Guionistas
- Robert Hill
- John Cleland
Elenco

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

4.5/10

414

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Dirección
- Russ Meyer
- Albert Zugsmith
Guionistas
- Robert Hill
- John Cleland
Elenco

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

Fotos25

+ 21

Opiniones de usuarios7

4.5414

Opiniones destacadas

2Red-Barracuda

Very weak, atypical film from Russ Meyer

Fanny Hill proved to be something of a one-off for famed sexploitation director Russ Meyer. For one thing, it was a film he made in West Germany and it was also a period film based on a literary source. It was hardly, therefore, the kind of material that Meyer was used to tackling. As such, it is definitely one of the less personal films he ever made, where he truly seemed like no more than a director-for-hire. The story follows a young woman who falls on hard times but is welcomed in a house populated by women; which the wide eyed innocent doesn't recognise as a brothel.

Whenever Meyer veers too far out of his comfort zone it often ends in trouble and Fanny Hill is unfortunately no exception. It is a film which will be unlikely to satisfy many Meyer fans nor those who liked the novel I should imagine. It's neither erotic nor funny and also commits one of the worse cinematic sins in being over-long too. Definitely a film which Meyer completists should at least see but it is something of a slog to get through though, so be warned. The most interesting aspect of it for me was the appearance of Laetitia Roman in the lead role. I had hitherto only known her from her starring performance in Mario Bava's highly influential year-zero giallo The Girl Who Knew Too Much (1963), which needless to say was a considerably better film than this one. But it was nice to see her in something else at the very least.

6ksf-2

the 1964 version of the Fanny Hill story

Inane dialogue in this Russ Meyer burlesque farce/love story....but the naughty subject matter and low cut dresses were probably enough to keep the viewing public interested. Our innocent little Italian-born star, Leticia Roman plays Fanny Hill, who is looking for work, and ends up boarding in a house full of "female cousins". Roman had made GI Blues, along with 8 other films prior to this one. The fast carnival-type music, the hair-dos, and the costumes tip us off that this will be an odd period piece. Mrs. Brown (Miriam Hopkins) takes Fanny in, and claims that the residents and the visitors are all related, which adds another weird dimension to the plot. Try to catch the new lyrics to "London Bridge is Falling Down" as they frolic at the king's palace....Later, Fanny meets the dashing sailor "Charles", and when separated, Fanny is devastated. This 1964 version is one hour 45 minutes, and goes on way too long. The 1968 subtitled Swedish version remake is actually easier to watch, since it's in color, only 91 minutes, and has a more cohesive script.

2elt

Turn an erotic novel into a cheap farce and the result's not pretty

This is probably the most expurgated version of Fanny Hill you'll ever see. The only way to get an R rating in 1964 for a movie with a sexual subject seems to be to turn it into a leering, puerile comedy. The problem is that it doesn't work as a comedy, or as erotica, or even as historic fiction.

The plot revolves around Fanny's belief that she has been taken in by a kind lady to work in a hat shop, instead of in an expensive brothel. Fanny manages to avoid the clients she's been set up with for the entire movie without ever finding out the truth. The plot never evolves beyond this obvious story. There's also no attention paid to accuracy: the setting for the movie lurches around between 1750 and 1890, and the dialogue ranges even further.

Of all the actors in the movie, only Leticia Roman and Miriam Hopkins show any life. The others are stick figures, feigning animation with affected voices and arched eyebrows. Not that Roman and Hopkins aren't guilty of overacting: they just occasionally show there might be more there.

This movie may be worth preserving along with "Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice" for anthropological studies on 1960's Hollywood attitudes towards sex, but it's not worth watching for entertainment. Read the book.

Más como esto

5.5

5.9

6.3

5.7

5.7

4.5

5.5

Good Morning... and Goodbye!

4.7

Cabaña conyugal

5.1

Heavenly Bodies

5.3

Finders Keepers, Lovers Weepers!

5.9

Supervixens

4.0

Eve and the Handyman

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que…?

Editar

Trivia
Russ Meyer and Albert Zugsmith didn't get along during the shooting of this film because Meyer wanted to make a serious movie while Zugsmith was more interested in making a slapstick comedy.

Citas
Mrs. Maude Brown: She's fresh as a young heifer still romping among the daisies in her innocence, almost mooing for her mama.
Mr. Dinklespieler: So you say, my Dear, so you say. But I have noted in the past a slight tendency on your part to exaggeration. Some of your heifers have turned out to be overblown milk cows.
Mrs. Maude Brown: Dear Dinklespieler, I am not asking you to purchase sight unseen. You may investigate fully.
Mr. Dinklespieler: Fully? How fully?
Mr. Dinklespieler: Fifty guineas worth.
Mr. Dinklespieler: 'od's blood, you ask more for an untried maiden than the government asks of me in taxes.
Mrs. Maude Brown: A lass like Fanny could never be taxing to a man of your prowess, dear cousin.
Mr. Dinklespieler: I have held my years well, I dare say, eh?
Mrs. Maude Brown: You have not aged one whit since you bounced me on your knee years ago.
Mr. Dinklespieler: I bounced you Madam, but not on my knee!
[they laugh salaciously]
Mr. Dinklespieler: Alright, alright. Bring the lass here.
Mrs. Maude Brown: Pray, remember, Dear Mr Dinklespieler, that the girl thinks we are cousins. Consanguinity is so reassuring in moments like this.
Mr. Dinklespieler: I have not dared tried that in years. You need equipment do you not? A rolling chair with castors, hot then cold running water, and trapeze attachment, huh?
Mrs. Maude Brown: No, no you misunderstand me. I mean the girl will be reassured if she thinks we are cousins.
Mr. Dinklespieler: Incest?
Mrs. Maude Brown: Pray, cousin, before I bring the lass in, the palpable evidence of your good faith...?
Mr. Dinklespieler: Madam, I am a busy man. My very being here is evidence of good faith. Put it on my account.
Mrs. Maude Brown: Backed up by fifty guineas in coin of the realm, I'd feel not a moment's hesitation leaving you alone with the girl. But without the coins themselves in my hand, my conscience would scarcely permit me to.
Mr. Dinklespieler: The devil with your conscience, bring me the maid.